U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE
C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS
UNITED STATES ) No. ACM 40024
Appellee )
)
v. )
) ORDER
Roderick X. STEWART )
Airman First Class (E-3) )
U.S. Air Force )
Appellant ) Special Panel
On 20 January 2022, Appellant submitted a Motion to Withdraw from Ap-
pellate Review and a Motion to Attach two documents. First, Appellant moved
to attach a DD Form 2330, Waiver/Withdrawal of Appellate Rights in General
and Special Courts-Martial Subject to Review by a Court of Criminal Appeals,
signed by Appellant and Appellant’s counsel on 10 January 2022. Second, Ap-
pellant moved to attach a declaration dated 20 January 2022 with written mat-
ters he requests the judge advocate consider during the subsequent review of
the case. See Article 65(d)(3), Uniform Code of Military Justice,
10 U.S.C.
§ 865(d)(3); Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 1115(f)(3); R.C.M. 1201(e). 1,2
On 24 January 2022, the Government responded and requested we grant
Appellant’s motions.
Accordingly, it is by the court on this 25th day of January, 2022,
ORDERED:
Appellant’s Motion to Withdraw from Appellate Review and Motion to At-
tach are GRANTED.
Appellant’s case is forwarded to the Appellate Records Branch, JAJM, for
1 References in this order are to the Uniform Code of Military Justice and Rules for
Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) are from the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2019
ed.).
2 This court denied Appellant’s first motion to withdraw from appellate review on 20
January 2022. That order incorrectly indicated that R.C.M. 1201(d) would apply to
Appellant’s case after withdrawal from direct appellate review. Instead, the proce-
dures in R.C.M. 1201(e) apply when a case is withdrawn from appellate review. We
note the remedies in R.C.M. 1201(f) are the same under either review.
United States v. Stewart, No. ACM 40024
further processing in accordance with R.C.M. 1115(f)(3) and 1201.
FOR THE COURT
FLEMING E. KEEFE, Capt, USAF
Acting Deputy Clerk of Court
2
