U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE
C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS
________________________
No. ACM S32692
________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Charles R. WILLIAMS
Staff Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Air Force, Appellant
________________________
Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary
Decided 10 January 2022
________________________
Military Judge: Mark W. Milam.
Sentence: Sentence adjudged on 28 January 2021 by SpCM convened at
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. Sentence entered by military
judge on 17 February 2021: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 10
months, reduction to E-1, and a reprimand.
For Appellant: None. *
Before JOHNSON, KEY, and MEGINLEY, Appellate Military Judges.
________________________
This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as
precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 30.4.
________________________
PER CURIAM:
The findings and sentence as entered are correct in law and fact, and no
error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles
* On 28 January 2021 and again on 22 March 2021, Appellant declined, in writing,
appellate defense counsel representation. See United States v. Xu,
70 M.J. 140
(C.A.A.F. 2011) (mem.); see also Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Jus-
tice, ¶ 14.5.2 (18 Jan. 2019).
United States v. Williams, No. ACM S32692
59(a) and 66(d), Uniform Code of Military Justice,
10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(d)
(Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2019 ed.)). Accordingly, the ap-
proved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT
CAROL K. JOYCE
Clerk of the Court
2
