McDaniel v. Ezell , 177 So. 3d 454 ( 2015 )

MOORE, Chief Justice

(concurring in the result).

I concur in the result because I believe the defect in William T. Ezell’s appeal to the circuit court was not that the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to entertain Ezell’s appeal on the basis that he did not have a right to appeal but that Ezell failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.