Snoyman v. Snoyman , 2012 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 271 ( 2012 )

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge,

dissenting.

Appellate review of a judgment modifying custody when the evidence was presented ore tenus is limited to determining whether there was sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s judgment. Cheek v. Dyess, 1 So.3d 1025, 1029 (Ala.Civ.App.2007). After reviewing the record in this case, I believe that there is sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s judgment and that the judgment is not plainly and palpably wrong. Therefore, I would affirm the judgment of the trial court.

PITTMAN, J., concurs.