eLaws | Code of Federal Regulations | United States Code |
 All Courts
 State Courts
 Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
 2003-04

Boykins v. State ( 2003 )


Menu:
  • 862 So.2d 594 (2003)

    Gregory BOYKINS
    v.
    STATE of Alabama.

    CR-01-0659.

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

    April 25, 2003.

    Gregory Boykins, pro se.

    Andrew W. Redd, gen. counsel, Department of Corrections, for appellee.

    On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

    WISE, Judge.

    In accordance with the holding in Ex parte Boykins, 862 So.2d 587 (Ala.2002), the judgment of the circuit court is reversed and this cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of Bullock County.

    *595 We note, however, that because the Supreme Court determined that Boykins's petition challenging the denial by the Department of Corrections ("DOC") of his request to earn incentive good time was improperly treated as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, rather than as a petition for a writ of certiorari, the Bullock Circuit Court no longer has jurisdiction to determine the merits of Boykins's petition. A petition for writ of habeas corpus is properly filed in the circuit court nearest to where the petitioner is incarcerated. See § 15-21-7, Ala.Code 1975. However, a petition for writ of certiorari against an administrative agency, in this instance, DOC, should be filed in "the Circuit Court of Montgomery County or in the circuit court of the county in which the agency maintains its headquarters." § 41-22-20(b), Ala.Code 1975. See also § 6-3-9, Ala. Code 1975. Because DOC maintains its headquarters in Montgomery County, Boykins's petition should have been filed in Montgomery County. See Pinkard v. State, 859 So.2d 449 (Ala.Crim.App.2003); Cox v. State, 628 So.2d 1075 (Ala.Crim. App.1993). Accordingly, on remand the Bullock Circuit Court should transfer Boykins's petition to Montgomery Circuit Court so that that court may properly determine the merits of Boykins's certiorari petition. Finally, we note that should an appeal be taken from the Montgomery Circuit Court's judgment, the appeal should be filed with the Court of Civil Appeals, because Boykins's case would be an appeal from an administrative agency, see § 12-3-10, Ala.Code 1975, rather than an appeal from a postconviction writ in a criminal case.

    REVERSED AND REMANDED.

    McMILLAN, P.J., and BASCHAB, J., concur. SHAW, J., concurs in the result, with opinion, which COBB, J., joins.

    SHAW, Judge, concurring in the result.

    I concur in reversing the judgment of the circuit court and remanding this case with instructions that it be transferred to Montgomery County. However, I express no opinion with respect to the following dicta in the majority opinion:

    "Finally, we note that should an appeal be taken from the Montgomery Circuit Court's judgment, the appeal should be filed with the Court of Civil Appeals, because Boykins's case would be an appeal from an administrative agency, see § 12-3-10, Ala.Code 1975, rather than an appeal from a postconviction writ in a criminal case."

    862 So.2d at 595.