Mitchell v. State ( 1926 )

SAMFORD, J.

Appellant’s counsel argues very ably and convincingly in brief that the evidence is not sufficient to justify a conviction under the indictment, but nowhere in the record is the question raised in 'such manner as calls fer a review of the court’s action in the matter.

The affirmative charge is not requested, nor is there an application for a new trial. The rulings of the court, as they appear in the record, are free from error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.