Peebles v. State , 23 Ala. App. 568 ( 1930 )

SAMFORD, J.

The positive undisputed evidence is to the effect that this defendant did not transport any whisky. A suspicion that he may have had something to do with the transportation is not sufficient to sustain a conviction. The defendant was entitled to the general charge, and in refusing this the court committed reversible error.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.