Etheridge v. State ( 1925 )

The evidence fails to connect defendants, or either of them, with possession of the stills found. The affirmative charge should have been given for defendants. Hobdy v. State (Ala.App.) 100 So. 571;¹ Biddle v. State, 19 Ala. App. 563,99 So. 59; Moon v. State, 19 Ala. App. 176, 95 So. 830; Farmer v. State, 19 Ala. App. 560, 99 So. 59; Medders v. State, 19 Ala. App. 628,99 So. 776; Watts v. State, 19 Ala. App. 549,98 So. 914.

Reversed and remanded.

¹ 20 Ala. App. 44