Hall v. State , 2016 Ark. 6 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                        Cite as 
    2016 Ark. 6
    SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS.
    No.   CR-15-875
    ANDROUS HALL                                       Opinion Delivered January   7, 2016
    PETITIONER
    PRO SE MOTION FOR BELATED APPEAL
    V.                                                 OF DEEMED-DENIED ORDER
    [PHILLIPS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,
    STATE OF ARKANSAS                                  NO. 54CR-96-271]
    RESPONDENT
    HONORABLE L.T. SIMES II, JUDGE
    MOTION DISMISSED.
    PER CURIAM
    In 1997, a Phillips County jury found petitioner Androus Hall guilty of aggravated
    robbery, first-degree battery, and attempted rape. The judgment reflects that an aggregate
    sentence of 576 months’ imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction was
    imposed. On November 10, 2014, Hall filed in the trial court a petition for writ of habeas
    corpus under Act 1780 of 2001 Acts of Arkansas, as amended by Act 2250 of 2005 and
    codified at Arkansas Code Annotated sections 16-112-201 to -208 (Repl. 2006). On October
    27, 2015, Hall filed a pro se motion in this court in which he asserts that the Act 1780 petition
    was deemed denied and seeks to proceed with a belated appeal of the order denying the
    petition.
    This court has held that the deemed-denied provision of our appellate rules does not
    apply in habeas proceedings. Hooper v. Hobbs, 
    2013 Ark. 31
    (per curiam). Although Act 1780
    sets a number of other deadlines, there is nothing in the Act concerning a required time in
    which the court must provide its order on a petition.
    Cite as 
    2016 Ark. 6
    Hall’s argument appears to be based on an allegation that he tendered a timely notice
    of appeal that was not accepted for filing. He seems to contend that, because he tendered the
    notice of appeal within the required time frame for a deemed-denied order, the order should
    therefore be construed to have been deemed denied.
    The same considerations that apply to other postconviction proceedings, as were noted
    in this court’s opinion in Hooper, apply to the present case. Hall’s Act 1780 petition was not
    deemed denied, and the matter remains one for resolution in the circuit court. The motion to
    proceed with a belated appeal is therefore dismissed.
    Motion dismissed.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CR-15-875

Citation Numbers: 2016 Ark. 6

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 1/7/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/2/2017