Pounder v. State , 2015 Ark. 138 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                      Cite as 
    2015 Ark. 138
    SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
    No.   CR-14-1057
    TERRY JOE POUNDER                                  Opinion Delivered April   2, 2015
    APPELLANT
    PRO SE MOTION FOR COPY OF
    V.                                                 APPEAL RECORD
    [SEBASTIAN COUNTY CIRCUIT
    COURT, FORT SMITH DISTRICT,
    STATE OF ARKANSAS                                  NOS. 66CR-04-997, 66CR-04-998, 66CR-
    APPELLEE         04-999, 66CR-04-1000, 66CR-04-1160]
    HONORABLE STEPHEN TABOR,
    JUDGE
    APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION
    MOOT.
    PER CURIAM
    In 2005, appellant Terry Joe Pounder entered a plea of guilty in the Sebastian County
    Circuit Court, Fort Smith District, to four counts of aggravated robbery, first-degree criminal
    mischief, theft by receiving, and robbery. An aggregate sentence of 396 months’ imprisonment
    was imposed. On October 9, 2014, appellant filed a petition in the trial court seeking to proceed
    in forma pauperis with a “motion for belated appeal, habeas corpus.” The trial court denied the
    petition, and appellant timely lodged an appeal from that order. Now before us is appellant’s
    pro se motion for copy of appeal record.
    We dismiss the appeal, and the motion is moot inasmuch as it is clear from the record
    that appellant could not prevail on appeal. An appeal of the denial of postconviction relief will
    not be permitted to go forward when it is clear from the record that the appeal is without merit.
    Hinkston v. State, 
    2014 Ark. 504
    (per curiam); Chambliss v. State, 
    2014 Ark. 188
    (per curiam).
    Cite as 
    2015 Ark. 138
    The petition to proceed in forma pauperis provides no articulated basis for proceeding
    with a motion for belated appeal of the denial of habeas relief. The petition includes only the
    statement that appellant desires to file a “motion for belated appeal, habeas corpus.” Even
    though the petition to proceed in forma pauperis refers to “habeas,” there is nothing in the
    petition to indicate the nature of a habeas petition or the grounds on which petitioner intends
    to rely to support his petition to proceed as an indigent. Under such circumstances, we cannot
    find any ground to reverse the trial court’s order.
    Appeal dismissed; motion moot.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CR-14-1057

Citation Numbers: 2015 Ark. 138

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 4/2/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/2/2015