Davis v. State , 2016 Ark. 366 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                     Cite as 
    2016 Ark. 366
    SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
    No.   CR-16-857
    Opinion Delivered: October   27, 2016
    BILLY DAVIS JR.
    APPELLANT
    V.                                                MOTION FOR BELATED APPEAL
    AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF
    STATE OF ARKANSAS                                 CERTIORARI
    APPELLEE
    MOTION FOR BELATED APPEAL
    GRANTED; PETITION FOR WRIT
    OF CERTIORARI TO COMPLETE
    AND LODGE THE RECORD
    WITHIN NINETY DAYS GRANTED
    PER CURIAM
    On March 1, 2016, a jury found Billy Davis Jr. guilty of aggravated robbery, first-
    degree battery, and theft of property. A sentencing order was entered on March 2, 2016.
    There is nothing in the record to reflect that trial counsel was relieved. Counsel denies that
    appellant timely informed him that he desired to appeal; instead, Davis belatedly filed a pro
    se notice of appeal and affidavit of indigency on May 2, 2016. Now before us is counsel’s
    motion for belated appeal in which he also seeks a writ of certiorari to bring up the record
    and proceed with the appeal.
    Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Criminal 16 (2015) provides in pertinent part
    that trial counsel, whether retained or court appointed, shall continue to represent a
    convicted defendant throughout any appeal, unless permitted by the trial court or the
    Cite as 
    2016 Ark. 366
    appellate court to withdraw in the interest of justice or for other sufficient cause. We have
    held, however, that a defendant may waive his right to appeal by his failure to inform counsel
    of his desire to appeal within the thirty-day period allowed for filing a notice of appeal under
    Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Criminal 2(a)(4). Sanders v. State, 
    330 Ark. 851
    , 
    956 S.W.2d 868
    (1997) (per curiam); Jones v. State, 
    294 Ark. 659
    , 
    748 S.W.2d 117
    (1988) (per
    curiam). It is clear that, regardless of whether Davis timely informed his counsel, he does,
    in fact, desire to appeal. He is entitled to a direct appeal of his conviction as a matter of
    right. Evans v. State, 
    356 Ark. 366
    , 
    151 S.W.3d 314
    (2004) (per curiam) (citing Douglas v.
    California, 
    372 U.S. 353
    (1963)).
    We grant the motion for belated appeal. Although Davis’s notice of appeal indicates
    that the complete transcript of the proceedings was ordered, only the partial record has been
    tendered to this court. Our clerk is directed to lodge the partial record. We issue the writ
    of certiorari to complete the record and have the entire record lodged within ninety days of
    this order. When the supplemental record is received, we direct the clerk to set an
    appropriate briefing schedule for the matter.
    Motion for belated appeal granted; writ of certiorari to complete and lodge the record
    within ninety days granted.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CR-16-857

Citation Numbers: 2016 Ark. 366

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 10/27/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/1/2017