Oliver v. Hobbs ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                       Cite as 
    2014 Ark. 339
    SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
    No. CV-14-485
    Opinion Delivered July 31, 2014
    PRO SE MOTION FOR BELATED
    BENJAMIN OLIVER                                     APPEAL OF ORDER
    PETITIONER          [LEE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO.
    39CV-13-4]
    V.
    HONORABLE L.T. SIMES, JUDGE
    RAY HOBBS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS
    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
    RESPONDENT                       MOTION DENIED.
    PER CURIAM
    In 2013, petitioner Benjamin Oliver filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus in
    the circuit court in Lee County where he is incarcerated.1 The circuit court denied the petition.
    No appeal was taken, and petitioner now seeks leave to proceed with a belated appeal.
    Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Civil 4(a) (2013) requires that a notice of appeal
    be filed within thirty days of the date an order is entered. Petitioner contends that he did not
    file a timely notice of appeal because he was not promptly notified by the circuit clerk that the
    order had been entered.
    A petitioner has the right to appeal a ruling on a petition for postconviction relief, which
    includes the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Sillivan v. Hobbs, 
    2014 Ark. 88
    (per
    curiam); McDaniel v. Hobbs, 
    2013 Ark. 107
    (per curiam); Wesley v. Harmon, 
    2010 Ark. 21
    (per
    1
    As of the date of this opinion, petitioner remains incarcerated at the prison facility in Lee
    County.
    Cite as 
    2014 Ark. 339
    curiam); McClain v. Norris, 
    2009 Ark. 428
    (per curiam). If the petitioner fails to file a timely
    notice of appeal, a belated appeal will not be allowed absent a showing by the petitioner of good
    cause for the failure to comply with proper procedure. McDaniel, 
    2013 Ark. 107
    ; Wesley, 
    2010 Ark. 21
    ; Garner v. State, 
    293 Ark. 309
    , 
    737 S.W.2d 637
    (1987) (per curiam).
    Even if the order was not promptly forwarded to petitioner, that fact in itself does not
    constitute good cause for petitioner’s failure to follow procedure. In contrast to the denial of
    a petition for postconviction relief under Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 (2013),2
    there is no absolute duty imposed in the statute on a judge or clerk to notify a petitioner that a
    petition for writ of habeas corpus has been denied. Wesley, 
    2010 Ark. 21
    ; McClain, 
    2009 Ark. 428
    ; Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-112-101 to -123 (Repl. 2006).
    Our law imposes a duty on lawyers and litigants to exercise reasonable diligence to keep
    up with the status of cases. Wesley, 
    2010 Ark. 21
    ; McClain, 
    2009 Ark. 428
    . The pro se litigant
    receives no special consideration in this regard. Wesley, 
    2010 Ark. 21
    ; see also Tarry v. State, 
    346 Ark. 267
    , 
    57 S.W.3d 163
    (2001) (per curiam). It is not the responsibility of the circuit clerk, or
    anyone other than the party desiring to appeal, to perfect the appeal. Day v. Hobbs, 
    2014 Ark. 189
    (per curiam). It was the duty of petitioner to file a timely notice of appeal, and he has not
    established good cause for his failure to do so.
    Motion denied.
    Benjamin Oliver, pro se petitioner.
    No response.
    2
    Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.3(d) places an obligation upon the circuit court
    to promptly mail a copy of the order to the petitioner.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CV-14-485

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 7/31/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024