Austin v. State , 309 Ark. 145 ( 1992 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    Appellant, Curtis Nathaniel Austin, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

    His attorney, Bill E. Ross, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

    We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to.the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Document Info

Docket Number: CR 92-349

Citation Numbers: 309 Ark. 145, 825 S.W.2d 608, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 243, 1992 WL 71157

Filed Date: 4/6/1992

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/2/2024