Oliver v. State ( 2016 )

Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 81
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION IV
No. CR-15-539
TRENCIE OLIVER Opinion Delivered February 10, 2016
APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,
V. FOURTH DIVISION
[NO. 60CR-14-1889]
HONORABLE HERBERT WRIGHT,
JUDGE
STATE OF ARKANSAS
APPELLEE REMANDED FOR CLARIFICATION
AND CORRECTION OF
SENTENCING ORDER;
SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD AND
ADDENDUM ORDERED
BART F. VIRDEN, Judge
The Pulaski County Circuit Court convicted appellant Trencie Oliver of second-
degree unlawful discharge of a firearm from a vehicle and possession of firearms by certain
persons, and he was sentenced as a habitual offender to an aggregate term of thirty years’
imprisonment. On appeal, Oliver raises several arguments; however, we cannot address the
merits at this time. Instead, we remand for clarification and correction of the sentencing
order, after which, Oliver may file a new notice of appeal and supplement the record and his
addendum with the order and notice.
Although this was a bench trial, the sentencing order entered April 20, 2015, reflects
that Oliver entered a negotiated guilty plea. The general rule is that there is no right to
Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 81
appeal from a guilty plea. Seibs v. State, 357 Ark. 331, 166 S.W.3d 16 (2004). As the
sentencing order now stands, this court does not have jurisdiction to hear the appeal;
therefore, we remand with instructions for the trial court to clarify and correct the sentencing
order. See, e.g., DeShazier v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 471. “[T]he trial court is without
jurisdiction to modify its judgment except to correct its judgment to make it speak the truth in aid
of the jurisdiction of the appellate court.” Williams v. State, 229 Ark. 42, 45, 313 S.W.2d 242, 244
(1958) (emphasis added). Oliver may then amend his notice of appeal to specify the order
from which an appeal is being taken. See, e.g., Todd v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 356, 465
S.W.3d 435.
We remand for the trial court to clarify and correct its sentencing order within seven
days, after which, should he choose to continue to pursue an appeal, Oliver will have thirty
days from entry of the order to supplement the record and his addendum with a new notice
of appeal and the corrected order.
Remanded for clarification and correction of sentencing order; supplemental record
and addendum ordered.
KINARD and GLOVER , JJ., agree.
Mullenix & Reardon, P.A., by: D. Ryan Mullenix and The Baxter Law Firm, by: Ray
Baxter, for appellant.
Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Evelyn D. Gomez, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
2