Whitson v. State , 2013 Ark. App. 730 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                                  Cite as 
    2013 Ark. App. 730
    ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
    DIVISION III
    No. CR-13-326
    Opinion Delivered   December 11, 2013
    PENNY J. WHITSON                                  APPEAL FROM THE BAXTER
    APPELLANT          COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
    [NO. CR-2009-130]
    V.
    HONORABLE GORDON WEBB,
    JUDGE
    STATE OF ARKANSAS
    APPELLEE         REMANDED TO SETTLE AND
    SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD;
    REBRIEFING ORDERED
    ROBIN F. WYNNE, Judge
    Penny Whitson appeals from the revocation of her probation. After a hearing on
    November 16, 2012, the circuit court revoked Whitson’s probation and sentenced her to a
    total of 122 months’ imprisonment. She argues on appeal that (1) the trial court erred by
    sentencing her to probation and drug court in November 2009 because she was ineligible for
    both; (2) because the November 2009 sentence was illegal, the sentence imposed upon
    revocation was also illegal; and (3) the trial court erred by “sentencing her to more time than
    her original sentence.” We cannot reach the merits at this time because we must remand for
    the circuit court to settle and supplement the record; rebriefing is then necessary.
    Apparently, on November 13, 2009, Whitson pled guilty to possession of a controlled
    substance and possession of drug paraphernalia and was sentenced to 144 months’ supervised
    Cite as 
    2013 Ark. App. 730
    probation. The order sentencing her to probation, however, is not included in the
    addendum or in record, nor is the charging instrument or the terms and conditions of
    Whitson’s probation. Without this original order and the relevant pleadings, we cannot
    consider the legality of the sentence imposed upon revocation. In addition, there is some
    indication that a sentencing order may have been entered before the order revoking
    appellant’s probation was filed on January 3, 2013, with the handwritten notation “amended
    revocation.” That order, if it exists, as well as any other relevant pleadings, orders, or other
    documents, should also be included in the supplemental record and addendum.
    This court has stated that if anything material to either party is omitted from the
    record by error or accident, we may direct that the omission be corrected and that a
    supplemental record be certified and transmitted. Miller v. State, 
    2011 Ark. App. 95
    , at 3;
    Ark. R. App. P.–Civ. 6(e) (as made applicable to criminal cases by Ark. R. App. P.–Crim.
    4(a)). Accordingly, we remand this case to the circuit court to settle and supplement the
    record. Appellant has thirty days from the date of this opinion to file a supplemental record
    with this court. Appellant’s substituted brief is due fifteen days after the supplemental record
    is filed. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3) (2012). The examples we have noted are not to be taken
    as an exhaustive list of deficiencies; counsel should carefully review the rules and ensure that
    no other deficiencies exist.
    Remanded to settle and supplement the record; rebriefing ordered.
    PITTMAN and HARRISON, JJ., agree.
    Law Office of Chris Lacy, by: Chris Lacy, for appellant.
    Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Eileen W. Harrison, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CR-13-326

Citation Numbers: 2013 Ark. App. 730

Judges: Robin F. Wynne

Filed Date: 12/11/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/11/2017