Standridge v. State , 2014 Ark. App. 230 ( 2014 )

Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 230ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
EN BANC
No. CR-13-15
Opinion Delivered April 9, 2014
TRACY M. STANDRIDGE APPEAL FROM THE BAXTER
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
APPELLANT [NO. CR-2010-218]
V. HONORABLE ROBERT M.
McCORKINDALE, JR., JUDGE
STATE OF ARKANSAS PRO SE MOTIONS AND MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOOT;
APPELLEE CURRENT COUNSEL RELIEVED;
NEW COUNSEL APPOINTED;
BRIEFING SCHEDULE ORDERED
PER CURIAM
In 2011, a Baxter County jury convicted Tracy Standridge of violating an order of
protection, a Class D felony, in Baxter County Circuit Court case number CR 10-218. He
timely filed a notice of appeal from this conviction, and the appeal was lodged with this court
in CACR 12-23. However, due to misprision, the notice of appeal was inexplicably absent
from the record filed with the appellate court. This court dismissed the appeal in CACR
12-23 without prejudice to allow Standridge to petition this court for permission to file a
belated appeal. Standridge v. State, 2012 Ark. App. 585. Standridge subsequently filed a pro
se motion to file belated appeal and produced a record demonstrating that a timely notice of
appeal had, in fact, been filed. The Supreme Court treated the motion as a motion for rule
Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 230on the clerk to lodge the record and granted him relief. The record has now been lodged
with this court and has been assigned case number CR-13-15.
Standridge has filed several pro se motions, including a motion to order rebriefing, to
relieve David Bowden as counsel, and to allow a handwritten brief or for appointment of an
attorney to file a brief. In our review of this matter, we note that counsel for Standridge has
suffered from significant health problems that have required him to request multiple
extensions of time to file a compliant brief—the last falling after the final filing extension
granted on March 5, 2014. For these reasons, and to expedite resolution of this matter, we
hereby remove David O. Bowden as attorney of record and appoint Paul J. Teufel, attorney
at law, to represent appellant in this appeal. Because we do this, Standridge’s pro se motions
are moot.
We direct our clerk to set a new briefing schedule for the appeal. The record in this
case, CR-13-15, and the record in CACR 12-23, the initially dismissed appeal, will be made
available for his review in the clerk’s office.
We note that, in filing his substituted brief, newly appointed counsel is not limited to
the arguments contained in former appellate counsel’s tendered briefs, but he should conduct
an independent review of the record and prepare a brief accordingly. In making this
statement, we express no opinion as to whether the new appeal should be on the merits or
should be made pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Rule 4-3(k) of the
Arkansas Rules of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals.
2
Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 230Pro se motions and motion for extension of time moot; current counsel relieved; new
counsel appointed; briefing schedule ordered.
Tracy M. Standridge, pro se appellant.
Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Valerie Glover Fortner, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
3