McCarty v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                   Cite as 
    2014 Ark. App. 404
    ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
    DIVISION II
    No. CR-13-901
    SHAWN PATRICK McCARTY                              Opinion Delivered   June 18, 2014
    APPELLANT
    APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN
    COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,
    GREENWOOD DISTRICT
    V.                                                 [NO. CR-04-152]
    HONORABLE JAMES O. COX,
    JUDGE
    STATE OF ARKANSAS
    APPELLEE        APPEAL DISMISSED
    PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge
    Shawn McCarty appeals from his sentencing following the revocation of his suspended
    imposition of sentence (SIS). Because McCarty pled no contest to the petition to revoke his
    SIS, we must dismiss his appeal.
    McCarty pled guilty to three counts of second-degree forgery in December 2004 in
    cases No. CR-2004-665, CR-2004-1299, and G-CR-2004-152; he was sentenced to ten
    years’ SIS. In addition, he was ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $3,294.60, as well
    as a fine, fees, and costs. The State filed a petition to revoke McCarty’s SIS in June 2010,
    alleging that he had failed to pay the restitution, fine, fees, and costs.
    McCarty pled no contest to the petition in December 2012, and the circuit court took
    the matter under advisement for six months in order to give McCarty a chance to make some
    Cite as 
    2014 Ark. App. 404
    payments toward the amounts he owed. At the sentencing hearing in September 2013, the
    State introduced, without objection, the restitution profile in the case, which showed that
    McCarty had only made one payment since his no-contest plea. McCarty testified on his
    own behalf, stating that he recalled the court ordering him to pay $50 per month when he
    entered his plea the previous December. McCarty admitted that, while he had made one
    payment toward the restitution he owed and had money to make more payments, he spent
    the money on drugs instead. The circuit court revoked McCarty’s SIS in case No. G-CR-
    2004-152 and sentenced him to four years, to be served at a regional correctional facility,
    with an additional six years’ SIS.
    Pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), and Rule 4-3(k) of the Rules
    of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, McCarty’s counsel has filed a motion
    to withdraw on the grounds that the appeal is wholly without merit. Counsel’s motion is
    accompanied by a brief referring to everything in the record that might arguably support an
    appeal; there were no objections raised during the hearing, and the only adverse ruling was
    the sentencing upon revocation of McCarty’s SIS. The clerk of our court furnished McCarty
    with a copy of his counsel’s brief and notified him of his right to file pro se points, but he has
    not done so.
    We must dismiss the appeal because McCarty is not permitted to bring an appeal in
    these circumstances. Except as provided by Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 24.3(b)
    (2013), there shall be no appeal from a plea of guilty or nolo contendere. Ark. R. App.
    P.–Crim. 1(a) (2013). Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 24.3(b) allows a defendant to
    2
    Cite as 
    2014 Ark. App. 404
    enter a conditional guilty plea under certain specified circumstances, but McCarty did not
    enter a conditional plea under Rule 24.3(b).
    Our supreme court has recognized two other exceptions to Rule 1(a). An appeal may
    be taken after a guilty plea when the issue on appeal is one of evidentiary errors that arose
    after the plea but during the sentencing phase of the trial, regardless of whether a jury was
    impaneled or the trial judge sat as the trier of fact during that phase. Johnson v. State, 
    2010 Ark. 63
    . An appeal may also be taken from the denial of a postjudgment motion to amend
    an incorrect or illegal sentence following a guilty plea. Reeves v. State, 
    339 Ark. 304
    , 
    5 S.W.3d 41
     (1999). Neither of those exceptions applies here—our review of the entire record
    indicates that there is no challenge to the evidence presented during McCarty’s sentencing
    hearing, and there is no challenge to the validity of the sentence itself. McCarty’s appeal is
    therefore dismissed, and the motion to withdraw is granted. See Houston v. State, 
    2014 Ark. App. 344
    .
    Appeal dismissed.
    GLADWIN , C.J., and PITTMAN , J., agree.
    David L. Dunagin, for appellant.
    No response.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CR-13-901

Judges: Phillip T. Whiteaker

Filed Date: 6/18/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014