Snowden v. State ( 2013 )

Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 634ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION III
No. CR-13-235
Opinion Delivered November 6, 2013
SAMUEL D. SNOWDEN
APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PIKE COUNTY
CIRCUIT COURT
[NO. CR-12-36-2]
V.
HONORABLE CHARLES A.
YEARGAN, JUDGE
STATE OF ARKANSAS
APPELLEE AFFIRMED
JOHN MAUZY PITTMAN, Judge
This is an appeal from a conviction for failure to meet sex-offender-reporting
requirements. After a bench trial, appellant was found guilty of failure to timely register as
required by Ark. Code Ann. § 12-12-904 (Repl. 2009) and was sentenced to one year in
prison, with any additional sentence suspended for a period of two years.
The sole argument on appeal is that the evidence is insufficient to support appellant’s
conviction because the State failed to prove that the Texas statute under which appellant was
previously convicted is sufficiently similar to Arkansas statutes to require appellant to register.
See Ark. Code Ann. § 12-12-903 (Repl. 2009). We cannot address this argument because
it is not preserved for appellate review. In order to preserve a challenge to the sufficiency
of the evidence for appeal, a defendant must move for a directed verdict or dismissal, and the
failure to make such a motion in the proper time and manner constitutes a waiver of any
question pertaining to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment. Ark. R.
Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 634Crim. P. 33.1(c). Here, appellant made no such motion at trial, and the issue of evidentiary
sufficiency is not preserved for appeal.
Affirmed.
GLADWIN, C.J., and WOOD, J., agree.
James Law Firm, by: William O. “Bill” James, Jr., for appellant.
Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Kathryn Henry, Ass’t Att’y Gen., and Jennifer Byrne,
Law Student Admitted to Practice Pursuant to Rule XV of the Rules Governing Admission
to the Bar of the Supreme Court under the supervision of Darnisa Evans Johnson, Deputy Att’y
Gen., for appellee.
2