Martin v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                                   Cite as 
    2013 Ark. App. 644
    ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
    DIVISION I
    No.CV-13-54
    KENNETH BRIAN MARTIN                              Opinion Delivered   November 6, 2013
    APPELLANT          APPEAL FROM THE BOONE
    COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
    V.                                                [NO. JV-10-100]
    HONORABLE GARY ISBELL, JUDGE
    ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF
    HUMAN SERVICES AND MINOR
    CHILD
    APPELLEES         AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED
    PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge
    Kenneth Brian Martin appeals from an October 17, 2012 Boone County Circuit
    Court order terminating his parental rights to his daughter, N.M, born November 24, 2008.1
    His attorney has filed a no-merit brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel, contending that
    there are no meritorious issues that could arguably support an appeal. We agree.
    In compliance with Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 
    359 Ark. 131
    , 
    194 S.W.3d 739
    (2004), and Rule 6-9(i) (2012) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme
    Court and Court of Appeals, Martin’s counsel ordered the entire record and examined it for
    adverse rulings. Counsel listed the only adverse ruling in this case—the trial court’s decision
    1
    The trial court also terminated the parental rights of N.M.’s mother, Leah Dossey
    Martin. She did not appear at the termination hearing and has not appealed the termination
    of her parental rights.
    Cite as 
    2013 Ark. App. 644
    to terminate Martin’s parental rights—and has adequately discussed why there is no arguable
    merit to an appeal. Martin was provided a copy of his counsel’s brief and motion, and he
    was informed of his right to file pro se points. He did not do so. Neither the Arkansas
    Department of Human Services nor the attorney ad litem filed a responsive brief.
    After carefully examining the record and the no-merit brief, we hold that Martin’s
    counsel has complied with the requirements for no-merit parental-termination appeals and
    that the appeal is wholly without merit. Accordingly, by memorandum opinion we affirm
    the termination of Martin’s parental rights to N.M. In re Memorandum Opinions, 
    16 Ark. App. 301
    , 
    700 S.W.2d 63
    (1985); Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 5-2(e) (2012). We also grant counsel’s motion
    to withdraw from representation of Martin.
    Affirmed; motion granted.
    HARRISON and GRUBER , JJ., agree.
    Leah Lanford, Arkansas Public Defender Commission, for appellant.
    No response.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CV-13-54

Judges: Phillip T. Whiteaker

Filed Date: 11/6/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021