Chavel Jemison v. State of Arkansas , 2022 Ark. App. 525 ( 2022 )

Cite as 2022 Ark. App. 525ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
No. CR-22-582
Opinion Delivered December 14, 2022
CHAVEL JEMISON
APPELLANT
APPELLEE’S MOTION TO REMAND
V. OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE,
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
STATE OF ARKANSAS TIME
APPELLEE
MOTION GRANTED; REVERSED
AND REMANDED
PER CURIAM
Chavel Jemison was convicted by a jury of commercial burglary and aggravated
robbery and was sentenced to 660 months in prison. We affirmed his convictions on direct
appeal in Jemison v. State, 2019 Ark. App. 475, 588 S.W.3d 359. Thereafter, Jemison filed a
Rule 37 petition as well as amended petitions. The circuit court denied his request for relief
following an evidentiary hearing. This appeal followed. The State has filed a motion asking
us to reverse and remand to the circuit court for findings mandated by Rule 37 of the
Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure.
When a hearing is granted on a petition for postconviction relief, the supreme court
has held that Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.3(c) is mandatory and requires the
trial court to provide written findings of fact and conclusions of law on every point upon
which the hearing is held. See Scott v. State, 351 Ark. 619, 96 S.W.3d 732 (2003) (per curiam).
When the circuit court fails to enter any written findings following a hearing, the supreme
court has consistently remanded the case to the circuit court for fact-finding on all the issues
raised in the petition. Campbell v. State, 2019 Ark. App. 409, at 2.
Due to the circuit court’s failure to make sufficient written findings, we cannot
effectively review the evidence and the court’s reasoning to determine whether the court’s
conclusions were clearly against the preponderance of the evidence. See Scott, supra. We
therefore grant the State’s motion to reverse and remand the case to the circuit court for
written findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Rule 37.3(c). See Campbell,
supra.
Motion granted; reversed and remanded.
2