QAF Technologies, Inc. ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
    Appeal of --                                 )
    )
    QAF Technologies, Inc.                       )       
    ASBCA No. 61875
    )
    Under Contract No. M67004-l 7-P-l 071        )
    APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:                       Theodore P. Watson, Esq.
    Cheryl Emerson Adams, Esq.
    Watson & Associates. LLC
    Aurora, CO
    APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT:                     Craig D. Jensen, Esq.
    Navy Chief Trial Attorney
    Nicole R. Best, Esq.
    Trial Attorney
    OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE SHACKLEFORD
    On September 30. 2017. the Department of the Navy. United States Marine
    Corps. Blount Island Command (USMC or government) awarded Contract
    No. M67004-l 7-P-l 071 (the contract) to QAF Technologies, Inc. (QAF or appellant).
    The contract was for delivery of dry freight and refrigerated cargo containers.
    The contract incorporated by full text Federal Acquisition Regulation
    (FAR) 52.212-4, CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS-COMMERCIAL ITEMS
    (JAN 2017).
    By letter dated September 21, 2018, the contracting officer terminated the
    contract for cause for QAF's failure to deliver the containers by the delivery date
    required by the contract. QAF timely appealed the decision by notice dated
    November 12, 2018, to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA or
    Board). The appeal was docketed as 
    ASBCA No. 61875
    .
    The parties have settled their dispute and have jointly requested that the Board
    issue a decision incorporating the terms of their agreement as set forth in their
    March 25, 2019 "RULE 19(d) STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY
    OF CONSENT JUDGMENT."
    In accordance with Board Rule l 9(d) of the ASBCA and the stipulation of the
    parties. it is the Board's decision. in the nature of a consent judgment, that:
    I
    I
    I
    I) The termination for cause is converted to a no-cost termination for
    convenience of the government;
    2) The Board makes no (zero) monetary award to appellant;
    3) Any claim for termination costs or other costs associated with or arising out
    of the contract by appellant is waived.
    Dated: April 10, 2019                       +/J-~-------
    ~i/ _:_Wl
    RICHARD SHACKLEFORD
    Administrative Judge
    Acting Chairman
    Armed Services Board
    of Contract Appeals
    I concur                                         I concur
    OWEN C. WILSON                                   ALEXANDER YO
    Administrative Judge                             Administrative Judge
    Vice Chairman                                    Armed Services Board
    Armed Services Board                             of Contract Appeals
    of Contract Appeals
    I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the
    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in 
    ASBCA No. 61875
    , Appeal of QAF
    Technologies, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
    Dated:
    JEFFREY D. GARDIN
    Recorder, Armed Services
    Board of Contract Appeals
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: ASBCA No. 61875

Judges: Shackleford

Filed Date: 4/10/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/23/2019