BAE Systems Tactical Vehicle Systems LP ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                 ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
    Appeals of --                                )
    )
    BAE Systems Tactical Vehicle Systems LP )           ASBCA Nos. 59491, 60433
    )
    Under Contract No. W56HZV-08-C-0460          )
    APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:                       David Z. Bodenheimer, Esq.
    Brian Tully McLaughlin, Esq.
    Skye Mathieson, Esq.
    Crowell & Moring LLP
    Washington, DC
    APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT:                      Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.
    Army Chief Trial Attorney
    CPT Harry M. Parent III, JA
    Robert B. Neill, Esq.
    Trial Attorneys
    OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE O'SULLIVAN ON THE
    GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEALS AS MOOT
    Appellant, BAE Systems Tactical Vehicle Systems LP (BAE TVS) appealed
    from a contracting officer's final decision claiming that BAE TVS provided defective
    cost or pricing data in 2008 negotiations to definitize a contract award for tactical
    vehicles and seeking the amount of$56,386,953, net of accepted offsets (ASBCA
    No. 59491). BAE TVS also appealed from the contracting officer's deemed denial of
    its revised offset proposal (ASBCA No. 60433). On 25 July 2016, the Board denied the
    government's motion for an indefinite stay of proceedings pending resolution of a related
    False Claims Act case filed in federal district court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
    BAE Systems Tactical Vehicle Systems LP, ASBCA Nos. 59491, 60433, 16-1 BCA
    ii 36,450. Familiarity with that decision is presumed.
    On 17 November 2016 the contracting officer unequivocally rescinded her final
    decision finding defective pricing, in its entirety, and disclaimed any intention on the part
    of the government to issue a new final decision. Thereafter, the government filed the
    pending motion seeking to have both appeals dismissed as moot. Appellant does not
    oppose the government's motion.
    DECISION
    Where a contracting officer unequivocally rescinds a government claim and the
    final decision asserting that claim, with no evidence that the action was taken in bad faith,
    there is no longer any claim before the Board to adjudicate. The government's voluntary
    action moots the appeal, leaving the Board without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal
    further. Combat Support Associates, ASBCA Nos. 58945, 58946, 16-1BCA,-i36,288 at
    176,973, and cases cited therein.
    Here, the contracting officer unequivocally rescinded the final decision asserting
    the government claim that is the subject of these appeals, stating expressly:
    The government claim asserted in references (a) and
    (b) [PCO 11 June 2014 Demand letter, Final Decision, and
    DCAA Audit Report dated 15 July 2014] and the Final
    Decision in reference (b) are hereby unequivocally and
    entirely rescinded. The Government has no intention of
    issuing a new Final Decision from those references.
    (Gov't mot. to dismiss, ex. 1) Thus, the government has voluntarily provided the
    relief sought in these appeals and there is no suggestion that the rescission is in bad faith.
    Additionally, offsets are allowed to the extent of overstatements only, Cutler-Hammer,
    Inc. v. United States, 
    416 F.2d 1306
    , 1312 (Ct. Cl. 1969), thus the offsets raised in
    ASBCA No. 60433 are mooted as well by the rescission of the final decision.
    For the reasons above, the appeals are dismissed as moot. Dismissal of an appeal
    as moot after rescission of a government claim is not a determination on the merits.
    Combat Support Associates, 16-1BCA,-i36,288 at 176,973; Lasmer Industries, Inc.,
    ASBCA No. 56411, 10-2 BCA ,-i 34,491 at 170, 123.
    Dated: 5 December 2016
    . / ;":!~
    LYN~LLJVAN
    Administrative Judge
    Armed Services Board
    of Contract Appeals
    (Signatures continued)
    2
    I concur                                      I concur
    ``./¢-~ RJC~EFORD
    Administrative Judge                           Administrative Judge
    Acting Chairman                                Vice Chairman
    Armed Services Board                           Armed Services Board
    of Contract Appeals                            of Contract Appeals
    I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the
    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 59491, 60433, Appeals of
    BAE Systems Tactical Vehicle Systems LP, rendered in conformance with the Board's
    Charter.
    Dated:
    JEFFREY D. GARDIN
    Recorder, Armed Services
    Board of Contract Appeals
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: ASBCA No. 59491, 60433

Judges: O'Sullivan

Filed Date: 12/5/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/27/2016