Perez v. Ryan ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Eric Perez, No. CV-19-05602-PHX-MTL (JFM) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Charles L Ryan, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 16 (R & R) (Doc. 136) recommending that Defendants Denault, Palomino, Wickware, and 17 Reyes be dismissed without prejudice. Neither party has filed objections to the R & R.* 18 Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts the R & R. The Court “may accept, reject, or 19 modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate 20 judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). “[T]he district judge must review the magistrate judge’s 21 findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise.” United 22 States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (emphasis in 23 original); see Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts need 24 not conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection”). 25 Based on the foregoing, 26 IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 136) is accepted. 27 /// 28 * Defendants Denault, Palomino, Wickware, and Reyes have not been served and have not appeared. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Denault, Palomino, Wickware, and 2|| Reyes are dismissed without prejudice. 3 Dated this 18th day of March, 2021. 4 Wicheal T. Fburde Michael T. Liburdi 7 United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-