Lopez v. Shinn ( 2021 )

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Hipolito Lopez, No. CV-20-02153-PHX-JAT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Centurian Managed Care, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (R&R), issued by the 16 Magistrate Judge to whom this case was referred, recommending that this case be 17 dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to comply with 18 court orders and failure to prosecute. (Doc. 16). The time to file objections to the R&R 19 has run and neither party has filed objections. 1 20 The Court hereby accepts the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) 21 (finding that district courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue 22 that is not the subject of an objection”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 23 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the 24 magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not 25 otherwise” (emphasis in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 26 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003). 27 1 Defendants have not been served and have not appeared. Plaintiff has been mailed copies of all Court orders, but these mailings have been returned as undeliverable because 28 Plaintiff’s address is not up to date. 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) is accepted; 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is dismissed, without prejudice, for 4|| failure to comply with Court orders and failure to prosecute; and the Clerk of the Court || shall enter judgment accordingly. 6 Dated this 8th day of April, 2021. 7 8 ' James A. Teilborg 10 Senior United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 -2- 28