LNS Enterprises LLC v. Continental Motors Incorporated ( 2021 )

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 LNS Enterprises LLC, et al., No. CV-19-05221-PHX-SMB 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Continental Motors Incorporated, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Retain Supplemental Jurisdiction. 16 (Doc. 98.) The remaining Defendants, Falcon Executive Aviation, Inc., Chandler Aviation 17 Services, Inc., and Lone Mountain Aviation, Inc., filed a Joint Response and Notice of 18 Non-Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Retain Supplemental Jurisdiction. (Doc. 99.) After 19 the Plaintiffs and Defendants filed these respective pleadings, the Court issued its order 20 granting final judgement under rule 54(b) to several other defendants in the case. (Doc. 21 100.) It appears that after this order was issued resolving the case against some parties, the 22 case was erroneously terminated as to all remaining parties on September 1, 2020. (Id.) As 23 such the parties never received a ruling on the remand or retention of their remaining 24 claims. 25 Having considered the Plaintiff’s motion and noted the acquiescence of all parties 26 the Court agrees that the “the values of judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and 27 comity” warrant exercising its discretion to retain the case. See City of Chicago v. Int’l 28 Coll. of Surgeons, 552 U.S. 156, 173 (1997). As such, Plaintiff’s remaining claims against 1|| Defendants Falcon Executive Aviation, Inc., Chandler Aviation Services, Inc., and Lone Mountain Aviation, Inc. will be retained. 3 Accordingly, 4 IT IS ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to vacate the previous termination of this case. 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Retain Supplemental Jurisdiction (Doc. 98) is granted. 8 Dated this 19th day of April, 2021. 9 10 Le = « > oO fonorable Susan M. Brnovich = 12 United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _2-