Goss v. Shepherd ( 2021 )

1 WO JL 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Brett William Goss, No. CV 21-00234-PHX-MTL (JFM) 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 J. Adam Shepherd, et al., 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 On February 8, 2021, Kenneth James Myers and 40 others, who are all or were 17 confined in the Gila County Jail in Globe, Arizona, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In a February 16, 2021 Order, the Court dismissed the action 19 and directed the Clerk of Court to open a new separate action on behalf of each Plaintiff. 20 The Court gave each Plaintiff 30 days to (1) pay the filing and administrative fees for his 21 individual case or file an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six- 22 month trust account statement and (2) file an amended complaint in his individual case. 23 This case was opened for Plaintiff Brett William Goss (hereinafter, “Plaintiff”). On 24 March 11, 2021, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint and an Application to Proceed 25 In Forma Pauperis. In a March 18, 2021 Order, the Court granted the Application to 26 Proceed and dismissed the First Amended Complaint with leave to amend because Plaintiff 27 had failed to state a claim. The Court gave Plaintiff 30 days to file a second amended 28 complaint that cured the deficiencies identified in the Order. 1 On April 1, 2021, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 9). The Court 2 will dismiss the Second Amended Complaint with leave to amend. 3 I. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints 4 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief 5 against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 6 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff 7 has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which 8 relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from 9 such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)–(2). 10 A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the 11 pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8 does 12 not demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the- 13 defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 14 (2009). “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere 15 conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Id. 16 “[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a 17 claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 18 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual content 19 that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the 20 misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for 21 relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial 22 experience and common sense.” Id. at 679. Thus, although a plaintiff’s specific factual 23 allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must assess whether there 24 are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id. at 681. 25 But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed, courts 26 must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 27 (9th Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less stringent 28 1 standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 2 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam)). 3 If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other 4 facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal 5 of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). 6 Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim, but 7 because it may possibly be amended to state a claim, the Court will dismiss it with leave 8 to amend. 9 II. Second Amended Complaint 10 In his three-count Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiff sues Gila County Sheriff 11 J. Adam Shepherd, Commander Justin Solberg, and Head Health Care Coordinator Penni 12 Padgett. Plaintiff asserts claims related to his conditions of confinement. He seeks 13 monetary relief in the amount of $50,000,000. 14 In Count One, Plaintiff alleges that from May 19, 2020 to the present, Defendant 15 Shepherd has been “faced with” preventing the spread of COVID-19 in Plaintiff’s housing 16 unit at the Gila County Jail. Plaintiff asserts that because “[t]he general procedure and 17 precautions were all over the news,” Defendant Shepherd was thereby “informed of the 18 minimum requirements for the prevention.” Plaintiff claims Defendant Shepherd did not 19 institute mandates for staff or detainees to wear masks or other personal protective 20 equipment (PPE), “as was the global requirement.” Plaintiff alleges Defendant Shepherd 21 also did not mandate testing for detainees or the “standard” 14-day quarantine. Plaintiff 22 contends that although these protocols were “known to” Defendant Shepherd, the protocols 23 were “ignored.” Plaintiff asserts that no mandates were “passed down from” Defendant 24 Shepherd to use any sanitizing products when cleaning the housing units. Plaintiff claims 25 that because of Defendant Shepherd’s inaction, he contracted COVID-19, lost his sense of 26 taste and smell, and has difficulty breathing. 27 In Count Two, Plaintiff alleges that from May 19, 2020 to the present, Defendant 28 Solberg was the Gila County Jail Commander and was “in control[] of decisions” made 1 regarding the day-to-day operations of the Jail. Plaintiff asserts that although “mandates 2 were bro[a]dcast on national news,” Defendant Solberg did not quarantine detainees upon 3 entry into the Jail. Between August 2020 and January 2021, Plaintiff requested PPE, but 4 Defendant Solberg denied his requests. During that time, there was no mandate for masks. 5 In January 2021, Plaintiff became very ill, and he asked Defendant Solberg to be tested for 6 COVID-19, quarantined, and given PPE. Plaintiff’s requests were denied until January 24, 7 2021, when Plaintiff tested positive for COVID-19. Despite this, Defendant Solberg 8 “decided that moving [Plaintiff] away from non-positive” detainees was not warranted. 9 Defendant Solberg also allowed Plaintiff’s food trays to travel through “infected areas” 10 and then to Plaintiff. 11 In Count Three, Plaintiff alleges that from May 19, 2020 through the present, 12 Defendant Padgett, as the Head Nurse and Health Care Director, was responsible for 13 decisions concerning detainees’ health and safety. Plaintiff asserts Defendant Padgett 14 ignored the nationwide mandate to practice social distancing, wear masks, and quarantine 15 to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Defendant Padgett also ignored “those needs” when 16 she refused to provide Plaintiff a mask, test him for COVID-19, or vaccinate him, despite 17 his “many requests.” 18 III. Failure to State a Claim 19 To state a valid claim under § 1983, plaintiffs must allege that they suffered a 20 specific injury as a result of specific conduct of a defendant and show an affirmative link 21 between the injury and the conduct of that defendant. See Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 22 371-72, 377 (1976). There is no respondeat superior liability under § 1983, and therefore, 23 a defendant’s position as the supervisor of persons who allegedly violated Plaintiff’s 24 constitutional rights does not impose liability. Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658 25 (1978); Hamilton v. Endell, 981 F.2d 1062, 1067 (9th Cir. 1992); Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 26 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989). “Because vicarious liability is inapplicable to Bivens and 27 § 1983 suits, a plaintiff must plead that each Government-official defendant, through the 28 official’s own individual actions, has violated the Constitution.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 676. 1 A pretrial detainee has a right under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth 2 Amendment to be free from punishment prior to an adjudication of guilt. Bell v. Wolfish, 3 441 U.S. 520, 535 (1979). “Pretrial detainees are entitled to ‘adequate food, clothing, 4 shelter, sanitation, medical care, and personal safety.’” Alvarez-Machain v. United States, 5 107 F.3d 696, 701 (9th Cir. 1996) (quoting Hoptowit v. Ray, 682 F.2d 1237, 1246 (9th Cir. 6 1982)). To state a claim of unconstitutional conditions of confinement against an 7 individual defendant, a pretrial detainee must allege facts that show: 8 (i) the defendant made an intentional decision with respect to the conditions under which the plaintiff was confined; 9 (ii) those conditions put the plaintiff at substantial risk of 10 suffering serious harm; (iii) the defendant did not take reasonable available measures to abate that risk, even though a 11 reasonable official in the circumstances would have 12 appreciated the high degree of risk involved—making the consequences of the defendant’s conduct obvious; and (iv) by 13 not taking such measures, the defendant caused the plaintiff’s 14 injuries. 15 Gordon v. County of Orange, 888 F.3d 1118, 1125 (9th Cir. 2018). 16 Whether the conditions and conduct rise to the level of a constitutional violation is 17 an objective assessment that turns on the facts and circumstances of each particular case. 18 Id.; Hearns v. Terhune, 413 F.3d 1036, 1042 (9th Cir. 2005). However, “a de minimis 19 level of imposition” is insufficient. Bell, 441 U.S. at 539 n.21. In addition, the “‘mere lack 20 of due care by a state official’ does not deprive an individual of life, liberty, or property 21 under the Fourteenth Amendment.” Castro v. County of Los Angeles, 833 F.3d 1060, 1071 22 (9th Cir. 2016) (quoting Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327, 330-31 (1986)). Thus, a 23 plaintiff must “prove more than negligence but less than subjective intent—something akin 24 to reckless disregard.” Id. 25 Although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 26 520-21 (1972), conclusory and vague allegations will not support a cause of action. Ivey 27 v. Bd. of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). Further, a liberal interpretation of a 28 1 civil rights complaint may not supply essential elements of the claim that were not initially 2 pled. Id. 3 Plaintiff’s allegations are too vague and conclusory to state a claim. Plaintiff alleges 4 that Defendants were aware of nationwide mandates, procedures, and protocols regarding 5 COVID-19 because they were broadcast on the national news, and nevertheless ignored 6 those mandates, but that does not support a conclusion that Defendants were aware of and 7 disregarded a substantial risk of serious harm to Plaintiff. Plaintiff also does not identify a 8 specific instance in which he asked Defendant Solberg or Defendant Padgett to be tested 9 for COVID-19, quarantined, and given PPE and the reason Solberg and Padgett gave, if 10 any, for denying Plaintiff’s requests. Absent additional information, Plaintiff fails to state 11 a claim in the Second Amended Complaint, and it will therefore be dismissed. 12 IV. Leave to Amend 13 Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a third amended complaint to cure the 14 deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will mail Plaintiff a court-approved form 15 to use for filing a third amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved 16 form, the Court may strike the third amended complaint and dismiss this action without 17 further notice to Plaintiff. 18 Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “Third 19 Amended Complaint.” The third amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its 20 entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original 21 Complaint or prior Amended Complaints by reference. Plaintiff may include only one 22 claim per count. 23 A third amended complaint supersedes the original Complaint and prior Amended 24 Complaints. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios 25 v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court 26 will treat the original Complaint and prior Amended Complaints as nonexistent. Ferdik, 27 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the original Complaint or a prior 28 Amended Complaint and that was voluntarily dismissed or was dismissed without 1 prejudice is waived if it is not alleged in a third amended complaint. Lacey v. Maricopa 2 County, 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). 3 V. Warnings 4 A. Release 5 If Plaintiff is released while this case remains pending, and the filing fee has not 6 been paid in full, Plaintiff must, within 30 days of his release, either (1) notify the Court 7 that he intends to pay the unpaid balance of his filing fee within 120 days of his release or 8 (2) file a non-prisoner application to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply may 9 result in dismissal of this action. 10 B. Address Changes 11 Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 12 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other 13 relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this 14 action. 15 C. Possible “Strike” 16 Because the Second Amended Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a 17 claim, if Plaintiff fails to file a third amended complaint correcting the deficiencies 18 identified in this Order, the dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” 19 provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring 20 a civil action or appeal a civil judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the 21 prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, 22 brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the 23 grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be 24 granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 25 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 26 D. Possible Dismissal 27 If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these 28 warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d 1| at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the Court). 3| ITIS ORDERED: 4 (1) The Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 9) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a third amended 6 | complaint in compliance with this Order. 7 (2) — If Plaintiff fails to file a third amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk 8 | of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) 10 | and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. 11 (3) The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a 12 | civil rights complaint by a prisoner. 13 Dated this 20th day of April, 2021. 14 Wicked T. diburde Michael T. Liburdi 17 United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 tc Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona 1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. ' 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment. 2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4 provides that complaints by incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law. 3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury. 4. The Filing and Administrative Fees. The total fees for this action are $402.00 ($350.00 filing fee plus $52.00 administrative fee). If you are unable to immediately pay the fees, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the “Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915” for additional instructions. 5. Original and Judge=s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten. This section does not apply to inmates housed at an Arizona Department of Corrections facility that participates in electronic filing. 6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file in the Tucson Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $402 filing and administrative fees or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to: 1 Revised 12/1/20 Phoenix & Prescott Divisions: OR Tucson Division: U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130 U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500 401 West Washington Street, SPC 10 405 West Congress Street Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119 Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010 7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case. 8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you submit to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis). Each original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date a copy of the document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a certificate of service may be stricken. This section does not apply to inmates housed at an Arizona Department of Corrections facility that participates in electronic filing. A certificate of service should be in the following form: I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed this (month, day, year) to: Name: Address: Attorney for Defendant(s) (Signature) 9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint, you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the court- approved civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave (permission) of Court within 21 days after serving it or within 21 days after any defendant has filed an answer, whichever is earlier. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). Thereafter, you must file a motion for leave to amend and lodge (submit) a proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an amended complaint may not incorporate by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv 15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are considered dismissed. All amended complaints are subject to screening under the Prison Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take additional processing time. 10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint. Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use to support or oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial. 11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff of any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written pleading or motion. 2 12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form. HEADING: 1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing address on the lines provided. 2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you name more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line, write the words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the names of all of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1- A” at the bottom. 3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED” in the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do so may result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are seeking only injunctive relief. Part A. JURISDICTION: 1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents” for federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of that authority. 2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights occurred. 3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,” “2-B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2. Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS: You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2-B,” etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2. Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION: You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate page. Number the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page 5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages. 3 1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the violation of only one civil right per count. 2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,” you must identify the specific issue involved. 3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which the act(s) occurred, if possible. 4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights. 5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you should disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures were not available for any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided. Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF: Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided. SIGNATURE: You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign the complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not bring an action on behalf of anyone but yourself. FINAL NOTE You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your complaint being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number the pages. 4 ___________________________________________ Name and Prisoner/Booking Number ___________________________________________ Place of Confinement ___________________________________________ Mailing Address ___________________________________________ City, State, Zip Code (Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA _________________________________________ , (Full Name of Plaintiff) ) Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. __________________________________ (To be supplied by the Clerk) (1) _______________________________________ , (Full Name of Defendant) CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT (2) _______________________________________ , BY A PRISONER (3) _______________________________________ , G Original Complaint (4) _______________________________________ , G First Amended Complaint G Second Amended Complaint Defendant(s). G Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them. A. JURISDICTION 1. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to: G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983 G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). G Other: . 2. Institution/city where violation occurred: . 550/555 B. DEFENDANTS 1. Name of first Defendant: . The first Defendant is employed as: ______________________________________________ at_______________________________________. (Position and Title) (Institution) 2. Name of second Defendant: . The second Defendant is employed as: as: ______________________________________________ at_______________________________________. (Position and Title) (Institution) 3. Name of third Defendant: . The third Defendant is employed as: ______________________________________________ at_______________________________________. (Position and Title) (Institution) 4. Name of fourth Defendant: . The fourth Defendant is employed as: ______________________________________________ at_______________________________________. (Position and Title) (Institution) If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page. C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS 1. Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner? G Yes G No 2. If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed? . Describe the previous lawsuits: a. First prior lawsuit: 1. Parties: v. 2. Court and case number: . 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . b. Second prior lawsuit: 1. Parties: v. 2. Court and case number: . 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . c. Third prior lawsuit: 1. Parties: v. 2. Court and case number: . 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page. 2 D. CAUSE OF ACTION COUNT I 1. State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies: a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your institution? G Yes G No b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . 3 COUNT II 1. State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies. a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your institution? G Yes G No b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . 4 COUNT III 1. State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies. a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your institution? G Yes G No b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page. 5 E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF State the relief you are seeking: . I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on DATE SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF ___________________________________________ (Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or other person who helped prepare this complaint) ___________________________________________ (Signature of attorney, if any) ___________________________________________ (Attorney=s address & telephone number) ADDITIONAL PAGES All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. 6