- 1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Richard Rynn, No. CV-18-00414-PHX-JJT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Gregory A. McKay, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 At issue are pro se Plaintiff Richard Rynn’s Motion to Set Aside Judgment (Doc. 82, 16 Mot.), to which Defendants filed a Response (Doc. 86, Resp.); Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave 17 to File Another Copy of Motion to Set Aside Judgment (Doc. 84); and Plaintiff’s Motion 18 to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney (Doc. 95). 19 Over two years ago, on November 6, 2018, the Court entered judgment dismissing 20 Plaintiff’s claims in this lawsuit with prejudice. (Docs. 71, 72.) Plaintiff now moves the 21 Court to set aside its judgment for “fraud on the court” under Federal Rule of Civil 22 Procedure 60(d)(3), arguing that Defendants acted improperly in a subsequent lawsuit in 23 state court leading to that court’s dismissal of Plaintiff’s subsequent claims. 24 Fraudulent conduct may rise to the level of fraud on this Court if it “harmed the 25 integrity of the judicial process” in the resolution of Plaintiff’s claims. See United States v. 26 Estate of Stonehill, 660 F.3d 415, 443 (9th Cir. 2011). The Court agrees with Defendants 27 (Resp. at 4) that misrepresentations in a separate, later state court proceeding—if they 28 occurred—cannot constitute fraud on this Court in an earlier proceeding. For this reason, Plaintiff has not shown a fraud on this Court under Rule 60(b)(3) warranting relief from 2|| the Court’s judgment in this action, and the Court must therefore deny Plaintiff's Motion || to Set Aside Judgment (Doc. 82). As a result, the Court will deny as moot Plaintiff's two 4|| further Motions (Docs. 84, 95). 5 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED denying Plaintiff's Motion to Set Aside 6 || Judgment (Doc. 82). 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to 8 || File Another Copy of Motion to Set Aside Judgment (Doc. 84). 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Plaintiff's Motion to Allow 10 || Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney (Doc. 95). This case remains closed. 12 Dated this 9th day of July, 2021. CN 13 “wok: 14 wefehlee— Unig StatesDistrict Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _2-
Document Info
Docket Number: 2:18-cv-00414
Filed Date: 7/9/2021
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/19/2024