Goins v. Phoenix Police Department ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Shana B Goins, No. CV-21-01162-PHX-DLR (CDB) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Phoenix Police Department, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles’ Report and 17 Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court dismiss this action without 18 prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to serve any named defendant pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the 19 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 46.) The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that 20 they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections 21 could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. See United States 22 v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (failing to timely object to an R&R 23 waives review of that R&R). 24 Neither party filed objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review 25 the R&R. Still, the Court reviewed the R&R and finds it well-taken. The Court accepts 26 the R&R in its entirety. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may 27 accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the 28 magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). 1 IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 46) is ACCEPTED. 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the reference of this case to the Magistrate Judge is 3|| WITHDRAWN, and this action shall be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment 5 || accordingly and terminate this case. 6 Dated this 19th day of November, 2021. 7 8 : Apues le 10 Wy 11 Ubited States Dictric Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _2-