Weibel v. Von Blanckensee ( 2021 )

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 3 4|| Nathaniel Weibel, No. CV-20-00341-TUC-JAS 5 Petitioner, ORDER 6 Vv. 7 Barbara Von Blanckensee, 8 Respondent. 9 10 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 11 || Magistrate Judge Ferraro that recommends that the Court deny and dismiss the Petition. A 12 || review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and 13 || Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not || consider any objections or new evidence. 15 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Ferraro’s 16 || recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F.Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 19 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 29 || C) Magistrate Judge Ferraro’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) is accepted and 91 || adopted. (2) The Petition (Doc. 1) is denied and dismissed. || (3) The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. 24 Dated this 23rd day of November, 2021. 25 26 \ _ — ¢ a7 Honorable James A. Soto 28 United States District Judge