Alozie v. Arizona Board of Regents ( 2021 )

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Nicholas Alozie, No. CV-16-03944-PHX-ROS 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Arizona Board of Regents, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Nicholas Alozie is a professor at Arizona State University, a public 16 university governed by Defendant Arizona Board of Regents (collectively, “ASU”).1 17 Alozie brought this matter in 2016, alleging three claims under Title VII of the Civil 18 Rights Act of 1964 and two claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1-1). Alozie alleged 19 ASU discriminated and/or retaliated against him as a result of a comment he made during 20 an interview during the dean search for the ASU College of Letters and Sciences. (Doc. 21 1-1 at 3). After the Court granted partial summary judgment in favor of Defendants, the 22 parties proceeded to a jury trial on Alozie’s Title VII retaliation claim. (Doc. 152 at 23). 23 On August 16, 2021, the jury found ASU retaliated against Alozie because of his 24 protected expression, resulting in $357,000 in harm to Alozie. (Doc. 244). 25 On September 8, 2021, Alozie filed a motion seeking $189,519.00 in attorneys’ 26 fees. (Doc. 274 at 1). Defendants filed a response on October 22, arguing Alozie’s 27 counsel are not entitled to the full attorneys’ fees award they seek and instead asking the 28 1 Arizona State University is a non-jural entity. The Arizona Board of Regents is the entity subject to suit pursuant to A.R.S. § 15-1625(B)(3). 1 Court to award Alozie’s counsel $120,602.52. (Doc. 291 at 1). The Court agrees with 2 Defendants that Alozie’s counsel are not entitled to $189,519.00. They will instead be 3 awarded $113,161.35. 4 BACKGROUND 5 Nicholas Alozie is a professor at ASU and has been the head of the Social Science 6 Department at the Polytechnic campus since 2005. (Doc. 22 at 5). In November 2014, 7 Alozie submitted himself for consideration to be dean of the ASU College of Letters and 8 Sciences. (Doc. 137 at 8). Three other faculty members applied for the position: Duane 9 Roen, the interim dean; Fabio Milner, a professor of mathematics and Director of 10 Mathematics for STEM Education; and Joseph Carter, associate dean of ASU’s school of 11 business. (Doc. 137 at 8). Alozie is African-American and originally from Nigeria, 12 Milner is Latino, and Roen and Carter are Caucasian. (Doc. 141 at 17). The fourteen- 13 member search committee determined each of the applicants met the required 14 qualifications for the position and interviewed each applicant. (Doc. 137 at 9). The 15 interviews were held on December 1, 2014 by the committee and the committee chair, 16 Marlene Tromp. 17 Alozie brought a written statement to his interview that he planned to read to the 18 search committee. (Doc. 137 at 9). He distributed copies of the statement to the 19 committee. (Doc. 137 at 9). Rather than permitting Alozie to read his statement aloud, 20 the search committee went straight to its pre-planned questions (Doc. 137 at 9) because 21 no other candidate had the opportunity to provide a similar statement to the committee. 22 (Doc. 277 at 17). Alozie’s statement made clear that he thought the search process was a 23 sham because Roen had already been preselected to be dean. (Doc. 137 at 10). In 24 relevant part, Alozie’s statement explained, 25 I worked with Milt Glick, our former provost, and other top ASU officials to close the ‘Revolving Door’ of minority scholars leaving ASU as quickly 26 as they arrived because they didn’t think the environment was favorable enough to warrant their staying at ASU. The complaint among young 27 minority faculty was that ASU was simply a stopover and for a rewarding career with advancement they had to move to another university. They 28 never saw ASU as a place to build a career. . . . 1 Indeed, the word in the College is that there is really no vacancy here, that this Dean’s position has already been promised and that the university is 2 simply going through the motions to dot its i’s and cross its t’s with this hiring process. Thus, I am expected, just like everyone else in the college to 3 back off and let the impending coronation take place. 4 (Doc. 137-1 at 199-200). The statement said Alozie “decided to apply for this position . . 5 . to create a level playing field for women and minorities.” (Doc. 137-1 at 201). The 6 statement then went on to explain why he felt he was qualified, and ended with an 7 expression of gratitude toward the committee for the “opportunity to talk about my 8 eligibility for the position.” (Doc. 137-1 at 202). Alozie verbally asked the committee 9 “not to put a glass ceiling on my career.” (DF 238). 10 After the interview, some members of the committee felt Alozie “came across as 11 testy, defensive, and aggressive in his interview” and “viewed Plaintiff’s accusation that 12 they had decided on a candidate and were going through the emotions of a search as an 13 attack on their integrity.” (Doc. 137 at 11-12). The record at trial indicated several 14 members of the committee responded poorly to Alozie’s statement. See, e.g., (Doc. 277 15 at 12, 27, 47; DF 520, 3209, 3634). 16 Alozie brought this action in Arizona state court on September 2, 2016. (Doc. 1-1 17 at 19). His complaint raised five claims: (1) race and national origin discrimination under 18 Title VII; (2) retaliation under Title VII; (3) disparate impact under Title VII; (4) 19 violation of his First Amendment rights brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and (5) 20 violation of his rights under the Equal Protection Clause under § 1983. (Doc. 22 at 14- 21 19). The Court granted a joint stipulation limiting the scope of Alozie’s discrimination 22 and retaliation claims, and dismissing most of the defendants from the § 1983 claims. 23 (Doc. 117). After the Court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in part, 24 the parties proceeded to trial only on Alozie’s claim that ASU retaliated against him in 25 response to his written statement submitted to the search committee. (Doc. 152 at 23). 26 The jury found in favor of Alozie on the unlawful retaliation claim and awarded 27 damages in the amount of $357,000. (Doc. 244). On September 1, the Court reduced 28 the damage award to $300,000 pursuant to the statutory cap codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1 1981a(b)(3)(D). (Doc. 266 at 2). 2 LEGAL STANDARD 3 The Court may award a reasonable attorney’s fees to the prevailing party in Title 4 VII litigation. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k). “[T]he court’s discretion to deny a fee award to a 5 prevailing plaintiff is narrow.” New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. Carey, 447 U.S. 54, 68 6 (1980). “The fee applicant bears the burden of documenting the appropriate hours 7 expended in the litigation and must submit evidence in support of those hours worked.” 8 Gates v. Deukmejian, 987 F.2d 1392, 1397 (9th Cir. 1992). The party opposing the 9 motion for attorneys’ fees bears a burden of rebutting “that requires submission of 10 evidence to the district court challenging the accuracy and reasonableness of the hours 11 charged or the facts asserted by the prevailing party in its submitted affidavits.” Id. at 12 1397-98. The Court must provide a “concise but clear explanation” of the reasons behind 13 its fee award. Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 437 (1983). The Ninth Circuit 14 requires district courts to “[s]how their work” in calculating fee awards. See Padgett v. 15 Loventhal, 705 F.3d 1205, 1208 (9th Cir. 2013). 16 In circumstances, such as this, where a plaintiff has not prevailed on all claims, the 17 Supreme Court has held that the district court may reduce the award of attorneys’ fees as 18 a matter of equitable judgment. See Hensley, 461 U.S. at 436-37. District courts retain 19 this discretion even if the plaintiff’s claims were interrelated, nonfrivolous, and raised in 20 good faith. See id. at 436. Because it is often difficult to determine how many attorney 21 hours were expended on each issue or claim, “the district court should focus on the 22 significance of the overall relief obtained by the plaintiff in relation to the hours 23 reasonably expended on the litigation.” See id. at 435. “There is no precise rule or 24 formula for making these determinations. The district court may attempt to identify 25 specific hours that should be eliminated, or it may simply reduce the award to account for 26 the limited success.” Id. at 436-37. 27 The first step in the attorney fee analysis is to determine the “‘lodestar’ figure, 28 which is the number of hours reasonably expended multiplied by a reasonable hourly 1 rate.” Gates, 987 F.2d at 1397. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held there exists “a 2 ‘strong presumption’ that the lodestar represents the ‘reasonable’” attorney fee. City of 3 Burlington v. Dague, 505 U.S. 557, 562 (1992) (quoting Pennsylvania v. Delaware 4 Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 565 (1986)). Nevertheless, the 5 Supreme Court has instructed district courts to “exclude from this initial fee calculation 6 hours that were not ‘reasonably expended.’” Hensley, 461 U.S. at 434 (quoting S. Rep. 7 No. 94-1011, at 6 (1976)). It has also noted, “[h]ours that are not properly billed to one’s 8 client also are not properly billed to one’s adversary.” Id. (quoting Copeland v. Marshall, 9 641 F.2d 880, 891 (1980) (en banc)) (emphasis omitted). 10 ANALYSIS 11 I. Lodestar figure 12 Alozie’s counsel seek $189,519.00 in attorneys’ fees. (Doc. 274 at 1). The 13 lodestar figure claimed by Alozie’s counsel will be reduced significantly for the reasons 14 set forth below. 15 A. Hourly rate 16 Alozie’s counsel seek rates beyond that which they charged their client. They are 17 not entitled to a fee award based on the elevated rates. See Gusman v. Unisys Corp., 986 18 F.2d 1146, 1149-50 (7th Cir. 1993) (“A client who retains a lawyer with an hourly rate of 19 $100, when the average in the community is $150, is entitled to collect from his 20 adversary only $100 for each hour reasonably expended.”). In the absence of “specific 21 evidence” demonstrating entitlement to a fee enhancement, see Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. 22 Winn, 559 U.S. 542, 554 (2010), the Court will award prevailing counsel the fee that 23 actually would have been charged to their client under counsel’s retention agreement. 24 The Court considers this a corollary to the Supreme Court’s instruction in Hensley that 25 “[h]ours that are not properly billed to one’s client also are not properly billed to one’s 26 adversary.” Hensley, 461 U.S. at 434 (citation omitted). 27 Thus, although Joshua Carden seeks an hourly fee of $400 per hour (Doc. 274-1 at 28 11), he will be awarded a fee of $350 because that is the hourly rate listed in the 1 contingent fee agreement between Alozie and Carden. (Doc. 274-1 at 8). Although 2 Alozie’s prior counsel, Tod Schleier, seeks $500 per hour, he will be awarded $250 per 3 hour based on the discounted hourly rate that was charged to Alozie pursuant to their fee 4 agreement. (Doc. 274-2 at 5). Although counsel seek $160 per hour for the work 5 completed by Schleier’s paralegal, Cindy Anderson (Doc. 274 at 5), the Court will award 6 only the $80 per hour set forth in the fee agreement. (Doc. 274-2 at 10). 7 All other counsel and paralegals will be awarded the rate they seek because the 8 record does not indicate they seek an enhanced rate. For example, the $125 per hour 9 charged by Carden’s paralegals and the $350, $225, and $135 per hour charged by 10 Michelle Matheson, her associate, and her paralegal, respectively, are reasonable an in 11 conformity with the rate actually charged to Alozie. (Doc. 274-1 at 4, 15). 12 B. Hours expended 13 The exhibits submitted with counsels’ fee application appears to seek an attorney 14 fee award for all hours expended on this litigation. However, because Alozie achieved 15 only partial success—on only one of Alozie’s five claims—the Court will reduce the total 16 number of hours calculated into the lodestar figure. The Court is not required to set forth 17 an hour-by-hour analysis of the fee request. See Gates, 987 F.2d at 1399. It instead “has 18 the authority to make across-the-board percentage cuts either in the number of hours 19 claimed or in the final lodestar figure ‘as a practical means of trimming the fat from a fee 20 application.’” Id. 21 Alozie proceeded to trial and prevailed on only one of his five claims and received 22 roughly half the verdict amount he sought. Based on the exhibits provided, the Court is 23 unable to determine how many of these hours were expended on the victorious claim and 24 how many on the claims that were dismissed. Defendants suggest the attorney hours 25 expended by Alozie’s counsel should be reduced by 15%.2 (Doc. 291 at 8). Left entirely 26 2 Across-the-board percentage cuts are common in cases where the Plaintiff achieved only partial or limited success. See, e.g., Dunlap v. Liberty Nat’l Prods., Inc., 878 F.3d 27 794, 799 (9th Cir. 2017) (holding the district court did not abuse its discretion in reducing the attorney fee award by 50% due to limited success); Schwarz v. Secretary of Health & 28 Hum. Servs., 73 F.3d 895, 905 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The court then assumed that 25% of the hours expended by Schwarz’s lawyers to that point were spent entirely on the one 1 to its own inclinations, the Court might reduce the hours expended by more than 15% due 2 to the relatively limited degree of success obtained by Alozie’s counsel because the Court 3 doubts that Alozie’s counsel used 85% of its billed hours on the retaliation claim. 4 However, because of the inherent imprecision in across-the-board percentage cuts, the 5 Court will instead adopt the reasonable and relatively modest 15% reduction suggested 6 by Defendants. 7 C. Lodestar 8 The final lodestar figure, with the above adjustments incorporated, is $113,161.35. 9 II. Further reductions 10 Defendants ask the Court to further reduce the fee by 10% due to Alozie’s limited 11 success. (Doc. 291 at 12). The Court will not do so because it considered Alozie’s 12 partial success in making the 15% reduction in hours. An additional 10% reduction 13 would therefore be duplicative of the analysis in calculating the lodestar figure. Cf. 14 Perdue, 559 U.S. at 553 (“[W]e have noted that ‘the lodestar figure includes most, if not 15 all, of the relevant factors constituting a reasonable attorney’s fee,’ and have held that an 16 enhancement may not be awarded based on a factor that is subsumed in the lodestar 17 calculation.”) (quoting Delaware Valley, 478 U.S. at 566) (internal quotation omitted). 18 Accordingly, 19 IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff Nicholas Alozie’s First Motion for Attorney Fees 20 (Doc. 274) is GRANTED IN PART. 21 … 22 … 23 … 24 … 25 … 26 27 remaining claim . . . This approach is entirely consistent with the cases in which we have applied Hensley to hold that a district court does not abuse its discretion when it resorts to 28 a mathematical formula, even a crude one, to reduce the fee award to account for limited success.”). 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in 2\|| favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Arizona Board of Regents in the amount of $113,161.35. 4 Dated this 30th day of November, 2021. 5 fo . 7 Honorable slyn ©. Silver g Senior United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -8- 5/21/2019 1.50 Carden 400 1.275 350 446.25 5/21/2019 3.50 Carden 400 2.975 350 1041.25 5/22/2019 6.50 Carden 400 5.525 350 1933.75 5/29/2019 0.50 Carden 400 0.425 350 148.75 6/17/2019 3.50 Carden 400 2.975 350 1041.25 8/1/2019 6.00 Carden 400 5.1 350 1785 8/3/2019 1.50 Carden 400 1.275 350 446.25 8/3/2019 6.00 Carden 400 5.1 350 1785 8/4/2019 10.00 Carden 400 8.5 350 2975 8/5/2019 10.50 Carden 400 8.925 350 3123.75 2/10/2020 1.80 Carden 400 1.53 350 535.5 2/10/2020 1.50 Carden 400 1.275 350 446.25 2/14/2020 3.00 Carden 400 2.55 350 892.5 2/17/2020 1.00 Carden 400 0.85 350 297.5 2/17/2020 0.50 Carden 400 0.425 350 148.75 2/18/2020 0.50 Carden 400 0.425 350 148.75 2/18/2020 1.20 Carden 400 1.02 350 357 2/19/2020 3.00 Carden 400 2.55 350 892.5 2/19/2020 2.50 Carden 400 2.125 350 743.75 3/9/2020 3.00 Carden 400 2.55 350 892.5 3/15/2020 1.70 Carden 400 1.445 350 505.75 3/18/2020 2.70 Carden 400 2.295 350 803.25 4/19/2020 0.30 Carden 400 0.255 350 89.25 6/4/2020 0.20 Carden 400 0.17 350 59.5 6/11/2020 0.20 Carden 400 0.17 350 59.5 6/11/2020 0.20 Carden 400 0.17 350 59.5 6/17/2020 0.20 Carden 400 0.17 350 59.5 7/22/2020 0.40 Carden 400 0.34 350 119 7/27/2020 0.30 Carden 400 0.255 350 89.25 7/29/2020 0.30 Carden 400 0.255 350 89.25 7/31/2020 0.20 Carden 400 0.17 350 59.5 1/5/2021 0.20 Carden 400 0.17 350 59.5 1/7/2021 0.20 Carden 400 0.17 350 59.5 1/13/2021 0.40 Carden 400 0.34 350 119 1/14/2021 0.20 Carden 400 0.17 350 59.5 1/19/2021 0.40 Carden 400 0.34 350 119 1/21/2021 0.20 Carden 400 0.17 350 59.5 6/2/2021 0.20 Carden 400 0.17 350 59.5 6/21/2021 0.30 Carden 400 0.255 350 89.25 7/6/2021 1.30 Carden 400 1.105 350 386.75 7/23/2021 2.00 Carden 400 1.7 350 595 7/26/2021 1.00 Carden 400 0.85 350 297.5 7/30/2021 2.00 Carden 400 1.7 350 595 7/30/2021 6.30 Carden 400 5.355 350 1874.25 7/31/2021 4.80 Carden 400 4.08 350 1428 8/3/2021 0.70 Carden 400 0.595 350 208.25 8/3/2021 0.30 Carden 400 0.255 350 89.25 8/4/2021 1.50 Carden 400 1.275 350 446.25 8/5/2021 0.90 Carden 400 0.765 350 267.75 8/6/2021 0.60 Carden 400 0.51 350 178.5 8/6/2021 0.50 Carden 400 0.425 350 148.75 8/10/2021 0.30 Carden 400 0.255 350 89.25 8/11/2021 9.00 Carden 400 7.65 350 2677.5 8/11/2021 2.50 Carden 400 2.125 350 743.75 8/12/2021 8.50 Carden 400 7.225 350 2528.75 8/12/2021 3.50 Carden 400 2.975 350 1041.25 8/13/2021 7.50 Carden 400 6.375 350 2231.25 8/16/2021 2.50 Carden 400 2.125 350 743.75 8/16/2021 2.50 Carden 400 2.125 350 743.75 8/18/2021 0.30 Carden 400 0.255 350 89.25 8/27/2021 0.50 Carden 400 0.425 350 148.75 8/31/2021 2.50 Carden 400 2.125 350 743.75 9/8/2021 6.50 Carden 400 5.525 350 1933.75 4/17/2020 0.30 Labadie 125 0.255 125 31.875 5/19/2020 0.40 Labadie 125 0.34 125 42.5 5/20/2020 0.20 Labadie 125 0.17 125 21.25 5/28/2020 0.20 Labadie 125 0.17 125 21.25 6/4/2020 0.30 Labadie 125 0.255 125 31.875 6/15/2020 0.20 Labadie 125 0.17 125 21.25 6/15/2020 0.30 Labadie 125 0.255 125 31.875 7/14/2021 0.30 Lyman 125 0.255 125 31.875 7/21/2021 0.20 Lyman 125 0.17 125 21.25 7/28/2021 0.20 Lyman 125 0.17 125 21.25 8/2/2021 0.20 Lyman 125 0.17 125 21.25 8/3/2021 5.00 Lyman 125 4.25 125 531.25 8/4/2021 0.20 Lyman 125 0.17 125 21.25 8/5/2021 0.30 Lyman 125 0.255 125 31.875 8/10/2021 0.20 Lyman 125 0.17 125 21.25 8/11/2021 2.00 Lyman 125 1.7 125 212.5 8/12/2021 0.30 Lyman 125 0.255 125 31.875 8/1/2018 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 8/2/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 8/2/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 8/3/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 8/3/2018 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 8/3/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 8/6/2018 1.70 Anderson 160 1.445 80 115.6 8/6/2018 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 8/6/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 8/6/2018 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 8/7/2018 0.30 Anderson 160 0.255 80 20.4 8/7/2018 0.40 T.Schleier 500 0.34 250 85 8/10/2018 1.20 T.Schleier 500 1.02 250 255 8/10/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 8/11/2018 1.80 T.Schleier 500 1.53 250 382.5 8/12/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 8/13/2018 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 8/13/2018 0.40 T.Schleier 500 0.34 250 85 8/13/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 8/13/2018 0.50 Anderson 160 0.425 80 34 8/14/2018 0.30 Anderson 160 0.255 80 20.4 8/14/2018 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 8/14/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 8/14/2018 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 8/14/2018 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 8/14/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 8/14/2018 1.40 Anderson 160 1.19 80 95.2 8/15/2018 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 8/15/2018 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 8/16/2018 0.50 T.Schleier 500 0.425 250 106.25 8/16/2018 0.40 T.Schleier 500 0.34 250 85 8/20/2018 0.50 T.Schleier 500 0.425 250 106.25 8/22/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 8/22/2018 1.00 Anderson 160 0.85 80 68 8/22/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 8/22/2018 1.50 Anderson 160 1.275 80 102 8/23/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 8/23/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 8/23/2018 3.30 Anderson 160 2.805 80 224.4 8/24/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 8/28/2018 1.70 Anderson 160 1.445 80 115.6 8/29/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 8/29/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 8/29/2018 1.80 Anderson 160 1.53 80 122.4 8/30/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 8/30/2018 3.60 Anderson 160 3.06 80 244.8 8/30/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 8/30/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 8/31/2018 1.20 Anderson 160 1.02 80 81.6 9/4/2018 0.30 Anderson 160 0.255 80 20.4 9/4/2018 3.10 Anderson 160 2.635 80 210.8 9/4/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 9/4/2018 0.30 Anderson 160 0.255 80 20.4 9/5/2018 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 9/5/2018 0.80 Anderson 160 0.68 80 54.4 9/5/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 9/5/2018 0.60 Anderson 160 0.51 80 40.8 9/5/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 9/7/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 9/7/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 9/7/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 9/7/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 9/7/2018 3.70 Anderson 160 3.145 80 251.6 9/10/2018 3.80 Anderson 160 3.23 80 258.4 9/10/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 9/11/2018 0.70 Anderson 160 0.595 80 47.6 9/12/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 9/12/2018 1.60 Anderson 160 1.36 80 108.8 9/13/2018 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 9/13/2018 2.70 Anderson 160 2.295 80 183.6 9/13/2018 0.80 Anderson 160 0.68 80 54.4 9/14/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 9/14/2018 1.10 Anderson 160 0.935 80 74.8 9/14/2018 2.20 Anderson 160 1.87 80 149.6 9/14/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 9/14/2018 0.40 T.Schleier 500 0.34 250 85 9/15/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 9/15/2018 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 9/15/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 9/17/2018 0.90 Anderson 160 0.765 80 61.2 9/17/2018 1.60 Anderson 160 1.36 80 108.8 9/17/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 9/18/2018 0.50 T.Schleier 500 0.425 250 106.25 9/18/2018 0.30 Anderson 160 0.255 80 20.4 9/18/2018 0.70 Anderson 160 0.595 80 47.6 9/19/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 9/20/2018 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 9/20/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 9/20/2018 0.50 Anderson 160 0.425 80 34 9/20/2018 1.20 Anderson 160 1.02 80 81.6 9/20/2018 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 9/20/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 9/21/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 9/21/2018 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 9/21/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 9/21/2018 1.30 Anderson 160 1.105 80 88.4 9/21/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 9/21/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 9/21/2018 2.70 Anderson 160 2.295 80 183.6 9/24/2018 1.50 Anderson 160 1.275 80 102 9/24/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 9/24/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 9/24/2018 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 9/25/2018 0.40 T.Schleier 500 0.34 250 85 9/25/2018 0.50 T.Schleier 500 0.425 250 106.25 9/25/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 9/25/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 9/26/2018 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 9/26/2018 0.50 T.Schleier 500 0.425 250 106.25 9/26/2018 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 9/26/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 9/26/2018 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 9/26/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 9/26/2018 0.30 Anderson 160 0.255 80 20.4 9/26/2018 0.90 Anderson 160 0.765 80 61.2 9/26/2018 1.00 Anderson 160 0.85 80 68 9/27/2018 1.40 T.Schleier 500 1.19 250 297.5 9/27/2018 3.30 Anderson 160 2.805 80 224.4 9/27/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 9/28/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 9/28/2018 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 9/30/2018 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 10/1/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 10/2/2018 0.30 Anderson 160 0.255 80 20.4 10/2/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 10/2/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 10/2/2018 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 10/2/2018 1.60 Anderson 160 1.36 80 108.8 10/2/2018 0.30 Anderson 160 0.255 80 20.4 10/3/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 10/3/2018 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 10/3/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 10/3/2018 0.50 Anderson 160 0.425 80 34 10/3/2018 0.80 Anderson 160 0.68 80 54.4 10/3/2018 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 10/4/2018 0.80 Anderson 160 0.68 80 54.4 10/4/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 10/5/2018 3.00 Anderson 160 2.55 80 204 10/8/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 10/8/2018 5.20 Anderson 160 4.42 80 353.6 10/9/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 10/9/2018 2.60 Anderson 160 2.21 80 176.8 10/9/2018 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 10/9/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 10/9/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 10/10/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 10/10/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 10/10/2018 3.50 Anderson 160 2.975 80 238 10/15/2018 1.30 Anderson 160 1.105 80 88.4 10/15/2018 0.50 Anderson 160 0.425 80 34 10/15/2018 4.30 Anderson 160 3.655 80 292.4 10/16/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 10/16/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 10/16/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 10/16/2018 3.70 Anderson 160 3.145 80 251.6 10/17/2018 2.10 Anderson 160 1.785 80 142.8 10/17/2018 1.30 Anderson 160 1.105 80 88.4 10/18/2018 2.70 Anderson 160 2.295 80 183.6 10/19/2018 2.90 Anderson 160 2.465 80 197.2 10/22/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 10/22/2018 3.60 Anderson 160 3.06 80 244.8 10/23/2018 2.10 Anderson 160 1.785 80 142.8 10/23/2018 1.50 Anderson 160 1.275 80 102 10/25/2018 0.30 Anderson 160 0.255 80 20.4 10/25/2018 1.20 T.Schleier 500 1.02 250 255 10/25/2018 0.30 Anderson 160 0.255 80 20.4 10/25/2018 0.70 Anderson 160 0.595 80 47.6 10/26/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 10/26/2018 3.40 Anderson 160 2.89 80 231.2 10/26/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 10/26/2018 1.30 Anderson 160 1.105 80 88.4 10/26/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 10/27/2018 1.10 T.Schleier 500 0.935 250 233.75 10/28/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 10/28/2018 1.20 T.Schleier 500 1.02 250 255 10/29/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 10/29/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 10/29/2018 3.40 Anderson 160 2.89 80 231.2 10/29/2018 7.50 T.Schleier 500 6.375 250 1593.75 10/30/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 10/30/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 10/30/2018 1.10 Anderson 160 0.935 80 74.8 10/30/2018 0.80 T.Schleier 500 0.68 250 170 10/30/2018 2.60 Anderson 160 2.21 80 176.8 10/31/2018 0.70 Anderson 160 0.595 80 47.6 10/31/2018 2.50 T.Schleier 500 2.125 250 531.25 10/31/2018 5.40 Anderson 160 4.59 80 367.2 11/1/2018 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 11/1/2018 1.40 Anderson 160 1.19 80 95.2 11/1/2018 1.30 Anderson 160 1.105 80 88.4 11/1/2018 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 11/2/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 11/2/2018 0.40 T.Schleier 500 0.34 250 85 11/2/2018 2.50 T.Schleier 500 2.125 250 531.25 11/2/2018 0.70 Anderson 160 0.595 80 47.6 11/3/2018 1.00 T.Schleier 500 0.85 250 212.5 11/5/2018 1.10 T.Schleier 500 0.935 250 233.75 11/5/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 11/5/2018 0.60 Anderson 160 0.51 80 40.8 11/5/2018 0.40 T.Schleier 500 0.34 250 85 11/5/2018 0.80 T.Schleier 500 0.68 250 170 11/6/2018 2.80 Anderson 160 2.38 80 190.4 11/6/2018 3.30 T.Schleier 500 2.805 250 701.25 11/6/2018 1.80 Anderson 160 1.53 80 122.4 11/6/2018 0.60 Anderson 160 0.51 80 40.8 11/7/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 11/7/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 11/7/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 11/7/2018 2.20 T.Schleier 500 1.87 250 467.5 11/7/2018 5.40 Anderson 160 4.59 80 367.2 11/8/2018 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 11/8/2018 1.60 T.Schleier 500 1.36 250 340 11/8/2018 0.70 Anderson 160 0.595 80 47.6 11/8/2018 1.30 T.Schleier 500 1.105 250 276.25 11/9/2019 2.50 Anderson 160 2.125 80 170 11/9/2019 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 11/10/2018 1.30 T.Schleier 500 1.105 250 276.25 11/12/2018 1.70 T.Schleier 500 1.445 250 361.25 11/13/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 11/13/2018 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 11/13/2018 1.70 T.Schleier 500 1.445 250 361.25 11/13/2018 1.40 Anderson 160 1.19 80 95.2 11/13/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 11/13/2018 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 11/14/2018 2.10 T.Schleier 500 1.785 250 446.25 11/14/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 11/14/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 11/14/2018 1.60 Anderson 160 1.36 80 108.8 11/14/2018 2.80 Anderson 160 2.38 80 190.4 11/14/2018 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 11/14/2018 4.20 T.Schleier 500 3.57 250 892.5 11/15/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 11/15/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 11/15/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 11/15/2018 1.60 Anderson 160 1.36 80 108.8 11/16/2018 1.20 Anderson 160 1.02 80 81.6 11/16/2018 1.30 T.Schleier 500 1.105 250 276.25 11/19/2018 1.30 Anderson 160 1.105 80 88.4 11/19/2018 1.40 Anderson 160 1.19 80 95.2 11/19/2018 1.40 T.Schleier 500 1.19 250 297.5 11/19/2018 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 11/19/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 11/19/2018 1.90 Anderson 160 1.615 80 129.2 11/19/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 11/19/2018 0.30 Anderson 160 0.255 80 20.4 11/20/2018 1.70 T.Schleier 500 1.445 250 361.25 11/20/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 11/20/2018 0.80 Anderson 160 0.68 80 54.4 11/20/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 11/20/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 11/21/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 11/21/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 11/23/2018 1.10 T.Schleier 500 0.935 250 233.75 11/24/2018 0.80 T.Schleier 500 0.68 250 170 11/26/2018 0.90 Anderson 160 0.765 80 61.2 11/26/2018 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 11/26/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 11/27/2018 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 11/27/2018 2.00 T.Schleier 500 1.7 250 425 11/27/2018 0.30 Anderson 160 0.255 80 20.4 11/27/2018 1.20 Anderson 160 1.02 80 81.6 11/27/2018 0.30 Anderson 160 0.255 80 20.4 11/28/2018 0.30 Anderson 160 0.255 80 20.4 11/28/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 11/28/2018 1.20 Anderson 160 1.02 80 81.6 11/28/2018 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 11/28/2018 1.30 Anderson 160 1.105 80 88.4 11/28/2018 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 11/28/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 11/28/2018 1.40 Anderson 160 1.19 80 95.2 11/29/2018 2.60 Anderson 160 2.21 80 176.8 11/30/2018 0.70 Anderson 160 0.595 80 47.6 11/30/2018 1.10 T.Schleier 500 0.935 250 233.75 12/3/2018 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 12/3/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 12/3/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 12/3/2018 1.40 T.Schleier 500 1.19 250 297.5 12/3/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 12/4/2018 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 12/4/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 12/6/2018 0.90 Anderson 160 0.765 80 61.2 12/7/2018 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 12/7/2018 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 12/7/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 12/11/2018 0.30 Anderson 160 0.255 80 20.4 12/11/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 12/12/2018 0.70 Anderson 160 0.595 80 47.6 12/26/2018 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 12/26/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 12/26/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 12/26/2018 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 12/27/2018 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 12/27/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 12/28/2018 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 12/28/2018 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 1/2/2019 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 1/2/2019 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 1/2/2019 0.40 T.Schleier 500 0.34 250 85 1/2/2019 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 1/3/2019 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 1/3/2019 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 1/3/2019 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 1/3/2019 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 1/5/2019 1.40 T.Schleier 500 1.19 250 297.5 1/7/2019 0.50 T.Schleier 500 0.425 250 106.25 1/7/2019 0.80 T.Schleier 500 0.68 250 170 1/7/2019 1.80 T.Schleier 500 1.53 250 382.5 1/8/2019 0.50 T.Schleier 500 0.425 250 106.25 1/8/2019 0.80 T.Schleier 500 0.68 250 170 1/8/2019 0.50 T.Schleier 500 0.425 250 106.25 1/8/2019 0.40 T.Schleier 500 0.34 250 85 1/8/2019 0.90 Anderson 160 0.765 80 61.2 1/9/2019 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 1/9/2019 0.40 T.Schleier 500 0.34 250 85 1/9/2010 0.50 T.Schleier 500 0.425 250 106.25 1/9/2019 3.10 Anderson 160 2.635 80 210.8 1/9/2019 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 1/9/2019 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 1/10/2019 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 1/10/2019 0.80 T.Schleier 500 0.68 250 170 1/10/2019 1.80 T.Schleier 500 1.53 250 382.5 1/10/2019 0.30 Anderson 160 0.255 80 20.4 1/10/2019 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 1/11/2019 1.10 T.Schleier 500 0.935 250 233.75 1/11/2019 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 1/12/2019 0.80 T.Schleier 500 0.68 250 170 1/12/2019 1.50 T.Schleier 500 1.275 250 318.75 1/14/2019 0.90 T.Schleier 500 0.765 250 191.25 1/14/2019 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 1/15/2019 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 1/16/2019 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 1/17/2019 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 1/18/2019 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 1/18/2019 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 1/18/2019 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 1/18/2019 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 1/18/2019 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 1/18/2019 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 1/21/2019 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 1/22/2019 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 1/22/2019 0.90 Anderson 160 0.765 80 61.2 1/23/2019 1.20 Anderson 160 1.02 80 81.6 1/25/2019 1.80 Anderson 160 1.53 80 122.4 1/26/2019 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 1/28/2019 2.60 Anderson 160 2.21 80 176.8 1/29/2019 3.70 Anderson 160 3.145 80 251.6 1/30/2019 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 1/30/2019 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 1/31/2019 0.60 T.Schleier 500 0.51 250 127.5 1/31/2019 3.10 Anderson 160 2.635 80 210.8 2/1/2019 2.50 Anderson 160 2.125 80 170 2/2/2019 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 2/4/2019 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 2/5/2019 0.50 Anderson 160 0.425 80 34 2/5/2019 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 2/5/2019 1.60 T.Schleier 500 1.36 250 340 2/5/2019 0.90 Anderson 160 0.765 80 61.2 2/6/2019 0.80 T.Schleier 500 0.68 250 170 2/7/2019 1.30 T.Schleier 500 1.105 250 276.25 2/7/2019 0.80 T.Schleier 500 0.68 250 170 2/7/2019 0.60 Anderson 160 0.51 80 40.8 2/8/2019 0.50 T.Schleier 500 0.425 250 106.25 2/8/2019 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 2/11/2019 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 2/11/2019 0.30 Anderson 160 0.255 80 20.4 2/11/2019 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 2/11/2019 1.80 Anderson 160 1.53 80 122.4 2/12/2019 0.40 T.Schleier 500 0.34 250 85 2/12/2019 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 2/12/2019 5.30 Anderson 160 4.505 80 360.4 2/12/2019 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 2/13/2019 1.30 T.Schleier 500 1.105 250 276.25 2/13/2019 0.50 T.Schleier 500 0.425 250 106.25 2/13/2019 0.50 Anderson 160 0.425 80 34 2/13/2019 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 2/13/2019 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 2/13/2019 4.50 Anderson 160 3.825 80 306 2/14/2019 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 2/14/2019 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 2/14/2019 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 2/14/2019 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 2/14/2019 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 2/14/2019 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 2/15/2019 1.30 T.Schleier 500 1.105 250 276.25 2/17/2019 1.10 T.Schleier 500 0.935 250 233.75 2/20/2019 0.60 T.Schleier 500 0.51 250 127.5 2/21/2019 1.20 T.Schleier 500 1.02 250 255 2/21/2019 1.40 T.Schleier 500 1.19 250 297.5 2/28/2019 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 2/28/2019 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 3/3/2019 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 3/4/2019 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 3/4/2019 0.10 T.Schleier 500 0.085 250 21.25 3/4/2019 0.20 B.Schleier 212.5 0.17 212.5 36.125 3/5/2019 0.80 T.Schleier 500 0.68 250 170 3/5/2019 0.50 T.Schleier 500 0.425 250 106.25 3/5/2019 1.00 T.Schleier 500 0.85 250 212.5 3/6/2019 0.80 T.Schleier 500 0.68 250 170 3/6/2019 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 3/12/2019 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 3/14/2019 0.20 T.Schleier 500 0.17 250 42.5 3/14/2019 0.10 Anderson 160 0.085 80 6.8 3/14/2019 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 3/18/2019 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 3/27/2019 0.30 T.Schleier 500 0.255 250 63.75 3/2/2019 0.80 T.Schleier 500 0.68 250 170 4/1/2019 2.20 Anderson 160 1.87 80 149.6 4/1/2019 1.90 Anderson 160 1.615 80 129.2 4/2/2019 1.30 Anderson 160 1.105 80 88.4 4/2/2019 0.20 Anderson 160 0.17 80 13.6 4/2/2019 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 4/26/2019 0.50 T.Schleier 500 0.425 250 106.25 5/2/2019 0.40 Anderson 160 0.34 80 27.2 8/26/2021 1.50 T.Schleier 500 1.275 250 318.75 8/26/2021 1.00 T.Schleier 500 0.85 250 212.5 1/16/2017 2.7 Armstrong 250 2.295 250 573.75 1/18/2017 0.4 Matheson 350 0.34 350 119 1/18/2017 0.7 Armstrong 250 0.595 250 148.75 1/19/2017 0.7 Armstrong 250 0.595 250 148.75 1/24/2017 1.3 Armstrong 250 1.105 250 276.25 1/25/2017 0.2 Matheson 350 0.17 350 59.5 1/25/2017 0.3 Armstrong 250 0.255 250 63.75 2/10/2017 4.7 Armstrong 250 3.995 250 998.75 2/14/2017 4.1 Armstrong 250 3.485 250 871.25 2/15/2017 2.7 Armstrong 250 2.295 250 573.75 2/17/2017 0.6 Matheson 350 0.51 350 178.5 2/19/2017 1.5 Matheson 350 1.275 350 446.25 2/20/2017 5.1 Armstrong 250 4.335 250 1083.75 2/21/2017 1.5 Armstrong 250 1.275 250 318.75 2/23/2017 2.9 Armstrong 250 2.465 250 616.25 3/13/2017 0.3 Matheson 350 0.255 350 89.25 3/21/2017 0.1 Matheson 350 0.085 350 29.75 3/23/2017 0.1 Matheson 350 0.085 350 29.75 9/21/2017 0.7 Matheson 350 0.595 350 208.25 10/2/2017 0.2 Matheson 350 0.17 350 59.5 10/2/2017 0.7 Armstrong 250 0.595 250 148.75 10/3/2017 1.9 Armstrong 250 1.615 250 403.75 10/4/2017 0.6 Armstrong 250 0.51 250 127.5 10/5/2017 0.2 Armstrong 250 0.17 250 42.5 10/6/2017 2.2 Armstrong 250 1.87 250 467.5 10/9/2017 0.5 Armstrong 250 0.425 250 106.25 10/11/2017 0.3 Hackett 135 0.255 135 34.425 10/11/2017 1 Armstrong 250 0.85 250 212.5 10/30/2017 0.9 Matheson 350 0.765 350 267.75 11/2/2017 4.1 Armstrong 250 3.485 250 871.25 11/3/2017 0.9 Armstrong 250 0.765 250 191.25 11/9/2017 1.5 Armstrong 250 1.275 250 318.75 11/10/2017 1.1 Armstrong 250 0.935 250 233.75 11/21/2017 0.3 Armstrong 250 0.255 250 63.75 12/5/2017 0.3 Matheson 350 0.255 350 89.25 12/14/2017 0.2 Matheson 350 0.17 350 59.5 12/19/2017 1 Matheson 350 0.85 350 297.5 12/19/2017 0.1 Matheson 350 0.085 350 29.75 12/20/2017 0.1 Matheson 350 0.085 350 29.75 12/21/2017 2.6 Armstrong 250 2.21 250 552.5 12/27/2017 4.7 Armstrong 250 3.995 250 998.75 12/28/2017 1.8 Armstrong 250 1.53 250 382.5 1/2/2018 0.7 Matheson 350 0.595 350 208.25 1/3/2018 0.5 Matheson 350 0.425 350 148.75 1/3/2018 2.9 Armstrong 250 2.465 250 616.25 1/21/2018 0.2 Matheson 350 0.17 350 59.5 1/22/2018 1.3 Armstrong 250 1.105 250 276.25 1/24/2018 0.4 Armstrong 250 0.34 250 85 1/25/2018 0.1 Matheson 350 0.085 350 29.75 1/25/2018 0.3 Armstrong 250 0.255 250 63.75 1/26/2018 1 Hackett 135 0.85 135 114.75 1/26/2018 0.2 Armstrong 250 0.17 250 42.5 1/29/2018 1.7 Matheson 350 1.445 350 505.75 2/8/2018 0.2 Matheson 350 0.17 350 59.5 2/13/2018 1.4 Armstrong 250 1.19 250 297.5 2/14/2018 3 Armstrong 250 2.55 250 637.5 2/15/2018 0.3 Armstrong 250 0.255 250 63.75 2/18/2018 3.8 Matheson 350 3.23 350 1130.5 2/19/2018 0.5 Matheson 350 0.425 350 148.75 2/21/2018 2.6 Armstrong 250 2.21 250 552.5 2/26/2018 0.1 Matheson 350 0.085 350 29.75 2/28/2018 0.3 Matheson 350 0.255 350 89.25 2/28/2018 1.1 Armstrong 250 0.935 250 233.75 3/4/2018 0.1 Matheson 350 0.085 350 29.75 3/7/2018 1.5 Armstrong 250 1.275 250 318.75 3/8/2018 0.2 Matheson 350 0.17 350 59.5 4/4/2018 0.2 Matheson 350 0.17 350 59.5 4/16/2018 0.2 Matheson 350 0.17 350 59.5 4/23/2018 1.1 Armstrong 250 0.935 250 233.75 4/24/2018 0.3 Armstrong 250 0.255 250 63.75 4/26/2018 0.2 Armstrong 250 0.17 250 42.5 5/11/2018 0.6 Matheson 350 0.51 350 178.5 5/23/2018 3.2 Armstrong 250 2.72 250 680 5/30/2018 0.7 Matheson 350 0.595 350 208.25 5/31/2018 0.5 Matheson 350 0.425 350 148.75 5/31/2018 2.9 Armstrong 250 2.465 250 616.25 6/1/2018 1.5 Matheson 350 1.275 350 446.25 6/1/2018 0.4 Armstrong 250 0.34 250 85 6/3/2018 2.3 Armstrong 250 1.955 250 488.75 6/4/2018 1.3 Matheson 350 1.105 350 386.75 6/4/2018 0.9 Armstrong 250 0.765 250 191.25 6/25/2018 0.1 Matheson 350 0.085 350 29.75 6/25/2018 0.2 Armstrong 250 0.17 250 42.5 6/28/2018 1.7 Armstrong 250 1.445 250 361.25 7/2/2018 2 Armstrong 250 1.7 250 425 7/9/2018 3.8 Armstrong 250 3.23 250 807.5 7/12/2018 5 Matheson 350 4.25 350 1487.5 7/13/2018 0.2 Matheson 350 0.17 350 59.5 7/15/2018 0.1 Matheson 350 0.085 350 29.75 7/23/2018 1.1 Matheson 350 0.935 350 327.25 1/23/2018 0.3 Matheson 350 0.255 350 89.25 Totals 628.00 533.8 113161.35