Valenzuela v. Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona ( 2022 )

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 4 || Francisco J. Valenzuela, ) No. CV 21-476-TUC-JAS (MSA) 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 || vs. Pasqua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona, ) Defendant. ; 9 ) 10 OO 1] Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 12 || Magistrate Judge Aguilera. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any 13 || objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. 14 || As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. The Court has reviewed 15 □□ the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s recommendations are not clearly 16 |] erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 17 || 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 18 || 1998). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s 19 || Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) 1s accepted and adopted; (2) This case is dismissed 20 || and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. 71 Dated this 14th day of December, 2022. 22 23 24 *° Honorable James A. Soto 27 United States District Judge 28