Ascension Arizona v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated ( 2022 )

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA | Ascension Arizona dba Carondelet St.) No. CV 21-434-TUC-JAS (BGM) Joseph’s Hospital, ) 5 ) ORDER Plaintiff, ) 6 ) vs. ) 7 ) 8 || Amerisure Insurance Company, et al. 9 Defendants. 10 1] Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 12 || Magistrate Judge Macdonald. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed 13 || any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. 14 |] As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. 15 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Macdonald’s 16 || recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; 17 || Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 18 || F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 19 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Macdonald’s 20 || Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) 1s accepted and adopted; (2) The motion to remand 21 || (Doc. 27) is denied. 22 Dated this 14th day of December, 2022. 23 24 25 ark, 26 Honorable James A. Soto 7 United States District Judge 28