Smith v. Lothrop ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Adam Smith, No. CV-22-01324-PHX-SMB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 William W Lothrop, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 United States Magistrate Judge Michael Morrissey has issued a Report and 16 Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that Plaintiff’s Complaint be dismissed without 17 prejudice (Doc. 13). The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days 18 to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 5) (citing Rule 72, Federal Rules of Civil 19 Procedure) No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review 20 the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 21 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). 22 Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and agrees with the analysis of 23 Magistrate Judge Morrissey. The Court will accept and adopt the R&R. 24 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the 25 Magistrate Judge (Doc. 13) is accepted. 26 … 27 … 28 … 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing this matter without prejudice and || directing the Clerk of Court to terminate this case. 3 Dated this 16th day of October, 2023. 4 —_— 5 _ 3 > 6 > fonorable Susan M. Brovich 7 United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _2-