Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Travis Wilson, No. CV-23-00008-TUC-JGZ (JR) 10 Plaintiff, Order Accepting Report & Recommendation 11 v. 12 Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 13 Defendant. 14 15 On November 2, 2023, Magistrate Judge Jaqueline M. Rateau issued a Report and 16 Recommendation (“R&R”) in which she recommended the Court reverse the 17 Administrative Law Judge’s decision and remand the matter to the Commissioner for 18 further administrative proceedings. (Doc. 23.) The R&R notified the parties they had 19 fourteen (14) days from the date of the R&R to file any objections. No objections have 20 been filed. 21 If neither party objects to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the 22 District Court is not required to review the magistrate judge’s decision under any specified 23 standard of review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). However, the statute for 24 review of a magistrate judge’s recommendation “does not preclude further review by the 25 district judge, sua sponte or at the request of a party, under a de novo or any other standard.” 26 Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154. 27 The Court finds the R&R well-reasoned and agrees with Judge Rateau’s conclusion 28 that the Administrative Law Judge’s decision should be reversed and remanded to the 1 || Commissioner for further proceedings. 2 Accordingly, 3 IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23) is ACCEPTED. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Administrative Law Judge’s decision is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative 6 || proceedings consistent with this Order and Judge Rateau’s Report & Recommendation. 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court shall docket this Order and close 8 || this action. 9 Dated this 12th day of December, 2023. 10 11 . 13 United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _2-