Boyd v. C R Bard Incorporated ( 2020 )

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 IN RE: Bard IVC Filters Products No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC Liability Litigation, 10 AMENDED SUGGESTION OF REMAND 11 AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) 12 13 14 This multidistrict litigation proceeding (“MDL”) involves personal injury cases 15 brought against Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 16 (collectively, “Bard”). Bard manufactures and markets medical devices, including 17 inferior vena cava (“IVC”) filters. The MDL Plaintiffs have received implants of Bard 18 IVC filters and claim they are defective and have caused Plaintiffs to suffer serious injury 19 or death. 20 The MDL was transferred to this Court in August 2015 when 22 cases had been 21 filed. Doc. 1. More than 8,000 cases had been filed when the MDL closed on May 31, 22 2019. Docs. 18079, 18128. Thousands of cases pending in the MDL have settled or are 23 near settlement. See Docs. 16343, 19445, 19798, 21167, 21410. The remaining cases no 24 longer benefit from centralized proceedings. 25 On August 20, 2019, the Court suggested the remand of 35 cases that were 26 transferred to this MDL by the United States Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation 27 (the “Panel”), and transferred more than 500 cases that were directly filed in the MDL to 28 appropriate districts. Doc. 19899 at 2-6, 34-59. The Court suggested the remand of 1 another case and transferred nearly 400 cases on October 17, 2019. Doc. 20672 2 at 2-4, 32-48. 3 In updated reports on the settlement status of cases, the parties identify 4 approximately 1,500 pending cases that are not likely to settle. Docs. 21406, 21426, 5 21410. These cases are now subject to remand or transfer. 6 The cases listed on Schedule A should be remanded to the transferor courts 7 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a). See Doc. 21410-1 (Am. Ex. A). The Court therefore 8 provides this Suggestion of Remand to the Panel. The cases listed on Schedule B, which 9 were directly filed in this MDL, will be transferred to appropriate districts pursuant to 10 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). See Docs. 21410-2, -10 (Am. Exs. B, C). To assist the courts that 11 receive these cases, this order will describe events that have taken place in the MDL. 12 A copy of this order, along with the case files and materials, will be available to courts 13 after remand or transfer. The cases listed on Schedule C will be unconsolidated from the 14 MDL, will remain in the District of Arizona, and will be assigned to the undersigned 15 judge. See Docs. 21410-2, -7 (Am. Exs. B, I); 21426 at 3-4. 16 I. Suggestion of Remand. 17 A. Remand Standard. 18 The power to remand MDL cases rests solely with the Panel. 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a); 19 see Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, 523 U.S. 26, 28 (1998). 20 The Panel typically relies on the transferee court to suggest when remand is appropriate. 21 See J.P.M.L. Rule 10.1(b)(i); In re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices Litig., 22 No. 07-MD-1840-KHV, 2012 WL 1963350, at *1 (D. Kan. May 30, 2012). Indeed, the 23 Panel “is reluctant to order a remand absent the suggestion of the transferee judge[.]” 24 J.P.M.L. Rule 10.3(a); see In re Regions Morgan Keegan Sec., Derivative & ERISA 25 Litig., No. 2:09-md-2009-SHM, 2013 WL 5614285, at *2 (W.D. Tenn. Feb. 28, 2013). 26 The transferee court may suggest remand when a case is “ready for trial, or . . . would no 27 longer benefit from inclusion in the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings.” 28 2 1 In re Multi-Piece Rim Prods. Liab. Litig., 464 F. Supp. 969, 975 (J.P.M.L. 1979); see 2 In re TMJ Implants Prods. Liab. Litig., 872 F. Supp. 1019, 1038 (D. Minn. 1995). 3 B. The Panel Should Remand the Cases Listed on Schedule A. 4 The primary purposes of this MDL – coordinated pretrial discovery and resolution 5 of common issues – have been fulfilled. All common fact and expert discovery has been 6 completed. The Court has also resolved many Daubert motions and Defendants’ 7 summary judgment motion based on preemption, as well as other summary judgment and 8 in limine motions in the bellwether cases. Six bellwether jury trials were scheduled, three 9 were held, a fourth settled on the eve of trial, one was resolved by summary judgment, 10 and one was dropped when Plaintiffs decided it would not provide helpful information. 11 The MDL cases listed on Schedule A are not likely to settle soon and no longer 12 benefit from centralized proceedings. The remaining case-specific issues are best left to 13 the transferor courts to resolve. The Court therefore suggests that the Panel remand the 14 cases on Schedule A to the transferor courts for further proceedings. See Doc. 21410-1 15 (Am. Ex. A); see also In re TMJ Implants, 872 F. Supp. at 1038 (suggesting remand of 16 cases that no longer benefited from consolidated pretrial proceedings). 17 II. Transfer Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). 18 A. Transfer Standard. 19 Section 1404(a) provides that “[f]or the convenience of parties and witnesses, in 20 the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or 21 division where it might have been brought or to any district or division to which all 22 parties have consented.” 23 B. The Direct-Filed Cases Listed on Schedule B Will Be Transferred. 24 Not all MDL cases were transferred to the Court by the Panel. Pursuant to Case 25 Management Order No. 4 (“CMO 4”), many cases were filed directly in the MDL 26 through use of a short form complaint. Doc. 363 at 3 (as amended by Docs. 1108, 1485). 27 Plaintiffs were required to identify in the short form complaint the district where venue 28 would be proper absent direct filing in the MDL. See id. at 7. CMO 4 provides that, 3 1 upon the MDL’s closure, each pending direct-filed case shall be transferred to the district 2 identified in the short form complaint. Id. at 3. 3 Pursuant to § 1404(a), the Court will transfer the cases listed on Schedule B to 4 the districts identified in the short form complaints or to the districts where the filters 5 were implanted based on information provided in plaintiff profile forms. See Docs. 6 21410-2, -10 (Am. Exs. B, L); 21426 at 2-3; see also In re Biomet M2a Magnum Hip 7 Implant Prods. Liab. Litig., No. 3:12-MD-2391, 2018 WL 7683307, at *1 (N.D. Ind. 8 Sept. 6, 2018) (transferring cases under § 1404(a) where they would “no longer benefit 9 from centralized proceedings[] and the remaining case-specific issues are best left to 10 decision by the courts that will try the cases”).1 Defendants’ right to challenge venue and 11 personal jurisdiction upon transfer is preserved. See Docs. 19899 at 4-6, 20672 at 4, 12 21426 at 4. 13 III. The MDL Proceedings. 14 A summary of the MDL proceedings is provided below to assist courts on remand, 15 if ordered by the Panel, and courts receiving transfers under § 1404(a). CMOs, discovery 16 orders, and other significant rulings are listed in Exhibit 1. The status of the remaining 17 case-specific discovery and other pretrial issues in individual cases should be addressed 18 by the courts receiving the cases on remand or transfer. 19 A. Plaintiffs’ Claims and the Pleadings. 20 The IVC is a large vein that returns blood to the heart from the lower body. An 21 IVC filter is a small device implanted in the IVC to catch blood clots before they reach 22 the heart and lungs. This MDL involves multiple versions of Bard’s retrievable IVC 23 filters – the Recovery, G2, G2X, Eclipse, Meridian, and Denali. These filters are 24 umbrella-shaped devices that have multiple limbs fanning out from a cone-shaped head. 25 26 1 27 Plaintiffs in sixteen cases identified no proper venue in the short form complaints. See Doc. 21410-10. No party objects to the cases being transferred to the 28 filter-implant districts. See Doc. 21406 at 4. 4 1 The limbs consist of legs with hooks that attach to the IVC wall and curved arms to catch 2 or break up blood clots. Each of these filters is a variation of its predecessor.2 3 The MDL Plaintiffs allege that Bard filters are more dangerous than other IVC 4 filters because they have higher risks of tilting, perforating the IVC, or fracturing and 5 migrating to vital organs. Plaintiffs further allege that Bard failed to warn patients and 6 physicians about these higher risks. Defendants dispute these allegations, contending 7 that Bard filters are safe and effective, that their complication rates are low and 8 comparable to those of other IVC filters, and that the medical community is aware of the 9 risks associated with IVC filters. 10 CMO 2, entered October 30, 2015, required the creation of a master complaint, a 11 master answer, and templates of short-form complaints and answers. Doc. 249 at 6. The 12 master complaint and answer were filed December 12, 2015. Docs. 364, 366. They are 13 the operative pleadings for most of the cases in this MDL. 14 The master complaint gives notice, pursuant to Rule 8, of the allegations that 15 Plaintiffs assert generally. The master complaint contains seventeen state law claims: 16 manufacturing defect (Counts I and V); failure to warn (Counts II and VII); design defect 17 (Counts III and IV); failure to recall (Count VI); misrepresentation (Counts VIII 18 and XII); negligence per se (Count IX); breach of warranty (Counts X and XI); 19 concealment (Count XIII); consumer fraud and deceptive trade practices (Count XIV); 20 loss of consortium (Count XV); and wrongful death and survival (Counts XVI and XVII). 21 Doc. 364 at 34-63. Plaintiffs seek both compensatory and punitive damages. Id. at 63. 22 Plaintiff-specific allegations are contained in individual short-form complaints or 23 certain complaints served on Defendants before the filing of the master complaint. See 24 25 2 26 In early 2019, Defendants moved to expand the scope of the MDL to include cases concerning Bard’s Simon Nitinol Filter (“SNF”), a permanent device that predated 27 the other filters in this litigation. The Panel denied the motion as moot because more than 80 SNF cases already had been filed in the MDL. None of the SNF cases are subject 28 to this order. 5 1 Docs. 249, 363, 365. Plaintiffs also provided Defendants with profile forms and fact 2 sheets that describe their individual claims and conditions. See Doc. 365. 3 B. Case Management Orders. 4 The primary orders governing pretrial management of this MDL are a series 5 of CMOs, along with certain amendments. To date, the Court has issued 45 CMOs. 6 These orders are discussed below and can be found on this District’s website at 7 http://www.azd.uscourts.gov/case-info/bard. 8 C. Lead Counsel. 9 CMO 1, entered October 30, 2015, appointed Co-Lead/Liaison Counsel for 10 Plaintiffs (“Lead Counsel”) to manage the litigation on behalf of Plaintiffs, and set out 11 the responsibilities of Lead Counsel. Doc. 248. Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel has changed 12 since the inception of the MDL. Mr. Ramon Lopez, of Lopez McHugh, LLP, in Newport 13 Beach, California, and Mr. Mark O’Connor, of Beus Gilbert PLLC, in Phoenix, Arizona, 14 are now Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs. Doc. 5285. Mr. Richard North of Nelson Mullins 15 Riley & Scarborough, LLP, in Atlanta, Georgia, is Defendants’ Lead Counsel. 16 D. Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee and Common Benefits Fund. 17 CMO 1 directed the selection and appointment of a Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee 18 (“PSC”) to assist in the coordination of pretrial activities and trial planning. Plaintiffs’ 19 Lead Counsel and the PSC together form the Plaintiffs’ Leadership Counsel (“PLC”). 20 The PLC assists all Plaintiffs in the MDL by overseeing discovery, appearing in court, 21 attending status conferences, and preparing motions and responses regarding case-wide 22 discovery matters. CMO 1 has been amended to select and appoint a Plaintiffs’ 23 Executive Committee (“PEC”) to assist Lead Counsel in the administration, organization, 24 and strategic decisions of the PLC. Doc. 4016. The configuration of the PSC has 25 changed during the course of the litigation. See Docs. 248, 4016, 5285. 26 CMO 6, entered December 18, 2015, set forth rules, policies, procedures, and 27 guidelines for fees and expenses incurred by attorneys acting for the common benefit of 28 all MDL Plaintiffs. Doc. 372. In May 2019, the Court increased the common benefit 6 1 attorneys’ fees assessment from 6% to 8%, but declined to increase the 3% assessment 2 for costs. Doc. 18038. 3 Upon remand or transfer, individual Plaintiffs likely will be represented by their 4 own counsel – the attorney or attorneys who filed their original complaint. Plaintiffs’ 5 Lead Counsel, the PSC, the PLC, and the PEC were tasked with managing the MDL for 6 Plaintiffs, not the individual cases on remand or transfer. 7 E. Status Conferences. 8 Since the inception of the MDL, the Court has held regular status conferences with 9 Lead Counsel for the parties to discuss issues related to the litigation. The initial case 10 management conference was held in October 2015. Doc. 246. Deadlines were set for, 11 among other things, the filing of master and short-form pleadings, profile forms, a 12 proposed protective order (including Rule 502 provisions), a proposed protocol 13 governing the production of electronically stored information (“ESI”), as well as 14 deadlines to complete first-phase MDL discovery and address privilege log issues. 15 Doc. 249. Thereafter, the Court held periodic status conferences to ensure that the parties 16 were on task and to address routine discovery issues and disputes. In addition to the 17 status conferences, the Court conducted telephone hearings to address time-sensitive 18 issues, as well as numerous additional conferences to consider various matters such as 19 dispositive motions and general case management issues. 20 F. Discovery. 21 1. General Fact Discovery. 22 Prior to the establishment of this MDL, Plaintiffs’ counsel had conducted 23 substantial discovery against Bard concerning all aspects of Bard IVC filters, including 24 the design, testing, manufacturing, marketing, labeling, and post-market surveillance of 25 the devices. Bard produced numerous documents and ESI and responded to thousands of 26 written discovery requests, and more than 80 corporate witness depositions were taken. 27 The pre-MDL fact discovery was made available by Bard to all Plaintiffs in the MDL. 28 7 1 CMO 8 established a procedure concerning re-deposing witnesses in the MDL. 2 Doc. 519. CMO 14 established deposition protocols generally. Doc. 2239. The Court 3 allowed additional depositions of a handful of corporate witnesses that had been 4 previously deposed, as well as numerous depositions of other Bard corporate witnesses, 5 including several Rule 30(b)(6) depositions. Docs. 3685, 4311. CMO 9 governed the 6 production of ESI and hard-copy documents. Doc. 1259. 7 Discovery in the MDL was separated into phases. The parties completed the first 8 phase of MDL discovery in early 2016. Doc. 519. The first phase included production of 9 documents related to an FDA inspection and warning letter to Bard, an updated 10 production of complaint and adverse event files, and an updated version of Bard’s 11 complaint database relating to IVC filters. Doc. 249. Plaintiffs also conducted a Rule 12 30(b)(6) deposition concerning the FDA inspection and warning letter, and a deposition 13 of corporate witness Kay Fuller. 14 The parties completed the second phase of fact discovery in February 2017. 15 CMO 8 set deadlines for the second phase, which included all common fact and 16 expert issues in the MDL, but not case-specific issues to be resolved after remand or 17 transfer. Docs. 249, 519. Second-phase discovery included extensive additional 18 discovery related to Bard’s system architecture for ESI, Bard’s ESI collection efforts, ESI 19 relating to Bard’s IVC filters, and Bard’s national and regional sales and marketing 20 practices. Plaintiffs also deposed two corporate witnesses in connection with Kay 21 Fuller’s allegations that a submission to the FDA regarding the Recovery filter did not 22 bear her original signature. Doc. 1319 (CMO 10). Plaintiffs deposed additional 23 corporate witnesses concerning the FDA inspections and warning letter. Id. 24 Bard also produced discovery regarding the sales and marketing materials related 25 to the SNF, documents comparing filter performance and failure rates to the SNF, and 26 internal and regulatory communications relating to the SNF. Docs. 1319, 10489. The 27 Court denied Plaintiffs’ request to obtain ESI discovery from Bard’s overseas operations. 28 Doc. 3398. The Court also denied Defendants’ request to discover communications 8 1 between Plaintiffs’ counsel and NBC news related to stories about the products at issue in 2 this litigation, and third-party financing that may be in place with respect to MDL 3 Plaintiffs. Docs. 3313, 3314. Plaintiffs were required to produce communications 4 between Plaintiffs and the FDA related to the FDA warning letter, but the Court denied 5 Defendants’ request to depose Plaintiffs’ counsel regarding these communications. 6 Docs. 3312, 4339. Defendants also produced punitive damages discovery, and Plaintiffs 7 conducted a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition related to Bard’s net worth. 8 All common fact discovery has now been completed except for preservation 9 depositions for certain witnesses who will not be traveling to testify live at the trials of 10 remanded and transferred cases. The parties are engaged in a meet and confer process as 11 to these depositions and shall complete them by March 16, 2020. See Docs. 16343, 12 19959, 21063. Thus, courts receiving these cases need not be concerned with facilitating 13 general fact discovery on remand or transfer. 14 2. Case-Specific Discovery. 15 CMO 5 governed initial case-specific discovery and required the parties to 16 exchange abbreviated profile forms. Doc. 365 (as amended by Doc. 927). Plaintiffs were 17 required to provide Defendants with a Plaintiff profile form (“PPF”) that described 18 individual conditions and claims. Id. at 5-9. Upon receipt of a substantially complete 19 PPF, Defendants were required to provide the individual Plaintiff with a Defendants’ 20 profile form (“DPF”) that disclosed information and documents concerning Defendants’ 21 contacts and relationship with Plaintiff’s physicians, tracking and reporting of Plaintiff’s 22 claims, and certain manufacturing related information for Plaintiff’s filter. Id. at 12-14. 23 Completed profile forms were considered interrogatory answers under Rule 33 or 24 responses to requests for production under Rule 34, and were governed by the standards 25 applicable to written discovery under Rules 26 through 37. Id. at 2-3. CMO 5 also set 26 deadlines and procedures for resolving any purported deficiencies with the parties’ 27 28 9 1 profile forms, and for dismissal of cases that did not provide substantially completed 2 profile forms. Id. at 2.3 3 Further discovery was conducted in a group of 48 cases (“Group 1”) selected for 4 consideration in the bellwether trial process from the pool of cases filed and properly 5 served on Defendants in the MDL as of April 1, 2016 (“Initial Plaintiff Pool”). 6 Docs. 1662, 3214, 4311 (CMOs 11, 15, 19). Plaintiffs in Group 1 were required to 7 provide Defendants with a Plaintiff fact sheet (“PFS”) that described their individual 8 conditions and claims in greater detail, and provided detailed disclosures concerning their 9 individual background, medical history, insurance, fact witnesses, prior claims, and 10 relevant documents and records authorizations. Docs. 1153-1, 1662 at 3. 11 Upon receipt of a PFS, Defendants were required to provide the individual 12 Plaintiff with a Defendants fact sheet (“DFS”) that disclosed in greater detail information 13 concerning Defendants’ contacts and relationship with Plaintiff, Plaintiff’s physicians, or 14 anyone on behalf of Plaintiff, Defendants’ tracking and reporting of Plaintiff’s claims, 15 sales and marketing information for the implanting facility, manufacturing information 16 for Plaintiff’s filter, and other relevant documents. Docs. 1153-2, 1662 at 3. Completed 17 fact sheets were considered interrogatory answers under Rule 33 or responses to requests 18 for production under Rule 34, and were governed by the standards applicable to written 19 discovery under Rules 26 through 37. Doc. 1662 at 3. CMO 11 set deadlines and 20 procedures for resolving any purported deficiencies with the parties’ fact sheets. Id. at 2, 21 4-5. CMO 12 governed records discovery for Group 1. Doc. 1663. The parties agreed to 22 use The Marker Group to collect medical, insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, prescription, 23 Social Security, workers’ compensation, and employment records for individual plaintiffs 24 from third-parties designated as custodians for such records in the PFS. Id. at 1. 25 26 27 3 The Court has dismissed certain cases where Plaintiffs failed to provide complete 28 PPFs. See Docs. 19874, 20667. 10 1 From Group 1, twelve cases were selected for further consideration as bellwether 2 cases (“Discovery Group 1”). Docs. 1662, 3685, 4311 (CMOs 11, 18, 19). CMO 20 set 3 deadlines for preliminary case-specific discovery in that group. Doc. 4335. Pursuant to 4 the protocols set in CMOs 14 and 21, the parties were permitted to depose each Plaintiff, 5 his or her spouse or a significant family member, the implanting physician, an additional 6 treating physician, and either a Bard sales representative or supervisor. Docs. 2239, 4866 7 at 1-2. From Discovery Group 1, six Plaintiffs were selected for potential bellwether 8 trials and further case-specific discovery (“Bellwether Group 1”). Docs. 1662, 3685, 9 4311, 5770, 11659 (CMOs 11, 18, 19, 23, and 34). 10 Except for the 48 cases in Group 1, the parties did not conduct case-specific fact 11 discovery for the cases listed on Schedules A and B during the MDL proceedings, other 12 than exchanging abbreviated profile forms. The Court concluded that any additional 13 case-specific discovery in these cases should await their remand or transfer. Thus, courts 14 receiving these cases should set a schedule for the completion of case-specific discovery. 15 3. Expert Discovery. 16 CMO 8 governed expert disclosures and discovery. Doc. 519. The parties 17 designated general experts in all MDL cases and case-specific experts in individual 18 bellwether cases. General expert discovery closed July 14, 2017. Doc. 3685 (CMO 18). 19 The parties did not conduct case-specific expert discovery for the cases listed on 20 Schedules A and B during the MDL proceedings. The Court concluded that case-specific 21 expert discovery in these cases should await their remand or transfer. Thus, courts 22 receiving these cases should set a schedule for the completion of case-specific expert 23 discovery. 24 4. Privileged Materials. 25 CMO 2 required Defendants to produce privilege logs in compliance with the 26 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Doc. 249. The parties were then required to engage in 27 an informal privilege log meet and confer process to resolve any privilege disputes. 28 Defendants produced several privilege logs identifying documents withheld pursuant to 11 1 the attorney-client privilege, the work-product doctrine, and other privileges. The parties 2 regularly met and conferred regarding the privilege logs and engaged in negotiations 3 regarding certain entries identified by Plaintiffs. As part of that meet and confer process, 4 Defendants provided Plaintiffs with a small number of these identified items for 5 inspection and, in some cases, withdrew certain claims of attorney-client privilege and 6 produced the previously withheld items. 7 CMO 3 governed the non-waiver of any privilege or work-product protection in 8 this MDL, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d), by Defendants’ disclosure or 9 production of documents on its privilege logs as part of the meet and confer process. 10 Doc. 314. 11 In late 2015, Plaintiffs challenged a substantial number of documents on 12 Defendants’ privilege log. The parties engaged in an extensive meet and confer process, 13 and Defendants produced certain documents pursuant to the Rule 502(d) order. See id. 14 Plaintiffs moved to compel production of 133 disputed documents. The Court granted 15 the motion in part. Doc. 2813. The parties identified several categories of disputed 16 documents and provided sample documents for in camera review. The Court denied 17 Plaintiffs’ motion with respect to seven of eight categories of documents and found only 18 one of the sample documents in one of the categories to contain unprivileged portions 19 that should be produced. The Court found all other documents protected by the attorney- 20 client privilege or work product doctrine. The Court directed the parties to use this ruling 21 as a guide to resolve remaining privilege disputes. 22 Since this ruling, there have been no further challenges to Defendants’ privilege 23 logs. Defendants continued to provide updated privilege logs throughout the discovery 24 process, and the parties met and conferred to resolve privilege disputes. Privilege issues 25 should not be a concern for courts that receive these cases. 26 5. Protective Order and Confidentiality. 27 A stipulated protective order governing the designation, handling, use, and 28 disclosure of confidential discovery materials was entered in November 2015. Doc. 269. 12 1 CMO 7, entered January 5, 2016, governed redactions of material from additional 2 adverse event reports, complaint files, and related documents in accordance with the 3 Health Insurance Portability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) and under 21 C.F.R. § 20.63(f). 4 Doc. 401. 5 In September 2016, to expedite production of ESI, the parties agreed to a primarily 6 “no-eyes-on” document production as to relevancy while still performing a privilege 7 review for this expedited ESI document production. CMO 17 (Doc. 3372) modified the 8 protections and requirements in the stipulated protective order (Doc. 269) and CMO 7 9 (Doc. 401) for ESI produced pursuant to this process. CMO 17 was amended in 10 November 2016. Doc. 4015. 11 Defendants filed a motion to seal certain trial exhibits at the conclusion of the first 12 bellwether trial. Doc. 11010. The Court denied this motion and Defendants’ subsequent 13 motion for reconsideration. Docs. 11642, 11766, 12069. Defendants also filed a motion 14 to enforce the protective order for the second and third bellwether trials collectively. 15 Doc. 13126. This motion was denied. Doc. 14446. A list of exhibits admitted at the 16 bellwether trials (excluding case-specific medical records) and documents deemed no 17 longer subject to the protective order are attached as Exhibit 2. 18 G. Bellwether Cases and Trials. 19 Six Plaintiffs were selected for potential bellwether trials. Docs. 5770, 11659 20 (CMOs 23, 34). The Court held three bellwether trials: Booker, No. CV-16-00474, 21 Jones, No. CV-16-00782, and Hyde, No. CV-16-00893. The Court granted summary 22 judgment in one of the bellwether cases, Kruse, No. CV-15-01634, and removed another 23 from the bellwether trial schedule at the request of Plaintiffs, Mulkey, No. CV-16-00853. 24 Docs. 12202, 13329. The final bellwether case, Tinlin, No. CV-16-00263, settled shortly 25 before trial in May 2019. The Court determined that further bellwether trials were not 26 necessary. Docs. 12853, 13329 (CMOs 38, 40). 27 /// 28 /// 13 1 1. Booker, No. CV-16-00474. 2 The first bellwether trial concerned Plaintiff Sherr-Una Booker and involved a 3 Bard G2 filter. The filter had tilted, migrated, and fractured. Plaintiff required open 4 heart surgery to remove the fractured limbs and repair heart damage caused by a 5 percutaneous removal attempt. Plaintiff withdrew her breach of warranty claims before 6 Defendants moved for summary judgment. The Court granted Defendants’ motion for 7 summary judgment on the claims for manufacturing defects, failure to recall, 8 misrepresentation, negligence per se, and breach of warranty. Docs. 8873, 8874. The 9 remaining claims for failure to warn, design defect, and punitive damages were tried to a 10 jury over a three-week period in March 2018. 11 The jury found for Plaintiff Booker on her negligent failure-to-warn claim, and in 12 favor of Defendants on the design defect and strict liability failure-to-warn claims. 13 Doc. 10595. The jury returned a verdict of $2 million in compensatory damages (of 14 which $1.6 million was attributed to Defendants after apportionment of fault) and 15 $2 million in punitive damages. Id.; Doc. 10596. The Court denied Defendants’ motions 16 for judgment as a matter of law and a new-trial. Docs. 10879, 11598. Defendants have 17 appealed. Docs. 11934, 11953. Plaintiff filed and later dismissed with prejudice a cross- 18 appeal. Docs. 12070, 17916. 19 2. Jones, No. CV-16-00782. 20 The second bellwether trial concerned Plaintiff Doris Jones and involved a Bard 21 Eclipse filter. Plaintiffs withdrew the manufacturing defect, failure to recall, and breach 22 of warranty claims. The Court granted summary judgment on the misrepresentation, 23 negligence per se, and unfair trade practices claims. Doc. 10404. The remaining claims 24 for failure to warn, design defect, and punitive damages were tried to a jury over a 25 three-week period in May 2018. The jury returned a defense verdict. Doc. 11350. 26 Plaintiff filed a motion to contact the jurors, which was denied. Docs. 11663, 12068. 27 Plaintiff’s appeal of the court’s rulings excluding cephalad migration death evidence is 28 pending. Docs. 12057, 12071. 14 1 3. Kruse, No. CV-15-01634. 2 Plaintiff Carol Kruse’s case was set for trial in September 2018. The Court 3 granted Defendants’ summary judgment motion on statute of limitations grounds. 4 Doc. 12202. 5 4. Hyde, No. CV-16-00893. 6 The third bellwether trial concerned Plaintiff Lisa Hyde and involved either a Bard 7 G2X or Eclipse filter (the exact model was in dispute). Ms. Hyde’s case was moved to 8 the September 2018 bellwether slot in lieu of Ms. Kruse’s case. Doc. 11867. Plaintiffs 9 withdrew their claims for manufacturing defect and breach of express warranty. The 10 Court granted summary judgment on the claims for breach of implied warranty, failure to 11 warn, failure to recall, misrepresentation, concealment, and fraud. Doc. 12007. The 12 Court also entered judgment in favor of Defendants on the negligence per se claim after 13 concluding that it was impliedly preempted under 21 U.S.C. § 337(a). Doc. 12589. The 14 remaining claims for design defect, loss of consortium, and punitive damages were tried 15 to a jury over three weeks in September 2018. After the close of Plaintiffs’ evidence, the 16 Court granted in part Defendants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law with respect to 17 future damages for any cardiac arrhythmia Ms. Hyde may experience, but denied the 18 motion as to the remaining claims. Doc. 12805. The jury returned a defense verdict. 19 Doc. 12891. Plaintiff has appealed. Docs. 13465, 13480. 20 5. Mulkey, No. CV-16-00853. 21 Plaintiff Debra Mulkey’s case involved an Eclipse filter and was set for trial in 22 February 2019. Before trial, Plaintiffs asked the Court to remove the Mulkey case from 23 the bellwether trial schedule because it was similar to the Jones and Hyde cases and 24 would not provide meaningful information to the parties. Doc. 12990. The Court 25 granted the motion. Doc. 13329. 26 6. Tinlin, No. CV-16-00263. 27 The final bellwether trial concerned Plaintiff Debra Tinlin and involved a Bard 28 Recovery filter. Plaintiffs withdrew their claims for manufacturing defect, failure to 15 1 recall, negligence per se, and breach of warranty. The Court granted summary judgment 2 on the misrepresentation and deceptive trade practices claims. Doc. 17008. The 3 remaining claims for failure to warn, design defect, concealment, loss of consortium, and 4 punitive damages were scheduled for trial in May 2019, but the case settled. 5 H. Key Legal and Evidentiary Rulings. 6 The Court has made many rulings in this MDL that could affect the remanded and 7 transferred cases. The Court provides the following summary of key legal and 8 evidentiary rulings to assist the courts that receive these cases. 9 1. Medical Monitoring Class Action Ruling. 10 In May 2016, Plaintiffs’ counsel filed a medical monitoring class action that was 11 consolidated with the MDL. See Barraza v. C. R. Bard, Inc., No. CV-16-01374-PHX- 12 DCG (D. Ariz. May 5, 2015). The Barraza Plaintiffs moved for class certification for 13 medical monitoring relief on behalf of themselves and classes of individuals who have 14 been implanted with a Bard IVC filter, have not had that filter removed, and have not 15 filed a claim or lawsuit for personal injury related to the filter. Id., Doc. 54. The Court 16 declined to certify the class. Id., Doc. 95. 17 The class certification motion recognized that only 16 states permit claims for 18 medical monitoring. The Court concluded that the classes could not be certified under 19 Rule 23(b)(3) because individual issues would predominate. Id. at 20-21. The Court 20 further concluded that the class could not be certified under Rule 23(b)(2) because the 21 medical monitoring relief primarily constituted monetary rather than injunctive relief, and 22 the class claims were not sufficiently cohesive to permit binding class-wide relief. Id. 23 at 21-32. Finally, the Court concluded that typicality under Rule 23(a)(3) had not been 24 established. Id. at 32-34. The Barazza Plaintiffs dismissed their claims without 25 prejudice. Docs. 106, 107. No appeal has been filed. 26 2. Federal Preemption Ruling. 27 Defendants moved for summary judgment on the grounds that Plaintiffs’ state law 28 claims are expressly preempted by the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (“MDA”), 16 1 21 U.S.C. § 360 et seq., and impliedly preempted by the MDA under the Supreme 2 Court’s conflict preemption principles. Doc. 5396. The Court denied the motion. 3 Doc. 8872. Defendants have appealed this ruling. Docs. 11934, 11953. 4 The MDA curtails state regulation of medical devices through a provision that 5 preempts state requirements that differ from or add to federal requirements. 21 U.S.C. 6 § 360k. The Bard IVC filters at issue in this litigation were cleared for market by the 7 FDA through section “510k” review, which focuses primarily on equivalence rather than 8 safety and effectiveness. See § 360c(f)(1)(A). 9 The Supreme Court in Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), held that 10 § 360k does not preempt state law claims directed at medical devices cleared through 11 the 510(k) process because substantial equivalence review places no federal requirements 12 on a device. Id. at 492-94. Lohr also noted that the “510(k) process is focused on 13 equivalence, not safety.” Id. at 493 (emphasis in original). Although the Safe Medical 14 Devices Act of 1990 (“SMDA”), Pub. L. 101-629, injected safety and effectiveness 15 considerations into 510(k) review, it did so only comparatively. The Court found that 16 Lohr remains good law and that clearance of a product under 510(k) generally does not 17 preempt state common law claims. Doc. 8872 at 12-14. 18 The Court further found that Defendants failed to show that the 510(k) reviews for 19 Bard IVC filters imposed device-specific requirements as needed for preemption under 20 § 360k. Id. at 14-20. Even if device-specific federal requirements could be ascertained, 21 Defendants made no showing that any particular state law claim is expressly preempted 22 by federal requirements. Id. at 21-22. 23 The Court concluded that Plaintiffs’ state law claims are not impliedly preempted 24 because Defendants failed to show that it is impossible to do under federal law what the 25 state laws require. Id. at 22-24. Defendants are pursuing their preemption arguments in 26 the Booker appeal. 27 /// 28 /// 17 1 3. The Lehmann Report Privilege and Work Product Rulings. 2 The Court granted Defendants’ motion for a protective order to prevent Plaintiffs 3 from using a December 15, 2004 report of Dr. John Lehmann. Doc. 699. Dr. Lehmann 4 provided various consulting services to Bard at different times. Following Bard’s receipt 5 of potential product liability claims involving the Recovery filter, Bard’s legal 6 department retained Dr. Lehmann in November 2004 to provide an assessment of the 7 risks associated with the Recovery filter and the extent of Bard’s legal exposure. 8 Dr. Lehmann prepared a written report of his findings at the request of the legal 9 department and in anticipation of litigation. The Court found the report to be protected 10 from disclosure by the work product doctrine. Id. at 4-12. The Court further found that 11 Plaintiffs had not shown a substantial need for the report or undue hardship if the report 12 was not disclosed. Id. at 13-15. The Court agreed with the parties that this ruling does 13 not alter any prior rulings by transferor judges in specific cases. Id. at 22. 14 4. Daubert Rulings. 15 The Court has ruled on Daubert motions directed at general experts, and refers the 16 remand and transfer courts to the following orders: 17 18 Daubert Order Doc. Nos. 19 20 Plaintiffs’ Expert Dr. Thomas Kinney 9428, 10323 21 Plaintiffs’ Experts Drs. Scott Resnick, Robert 9432 22 Vogelzang, Kush Desai, and Robert Lewandowski 23 Plaintiffs’ Experts Drs. David Kessler and Suzanne 9433 24 Parisian 25 Plaintiffs’ Experts Drs. Thomas Kinney, Anne Christine 9434 26 Roberts, and Sanjeeva Kalva 27 Plaintiffs’ Expert Dr. Mark Eisenberg 9770 28 18 1 Plaintiffs’ Expert Dr. Derek Muehrcke 9771 2 3 Plaintiffs’ Expert Dr. Darren Hurst 9772 4 Plaintiffs’ Expert Dr. Rebecca Betensky 9773 5 6 Defendants’ Expert Dr. Clement Grassi 9991, 10230 7 8 Plaintiffs’ Expert Dr. Robert McMeeking 10051, 16992 9 Plaintiffs’ Expert Dr. Robert Ritchie 10052 10 11 Plaintiffs’ Experts Drs. David Garcia and Michael Streiff 10072 12 Defendants’ Expert Dr. Christopher Morris 10230, 10231, 13 17285 14 15 5. Motion in Limine Rulings. 16 a. FDA Evidence (Cisson Motion). 17 In the Booker bellwether trial, Plaintiffs sought to exclude, under Federal Rules of 18 Evidence 402 and 403, evidence of the FDA’s 510(k) clearance of Bard IVC filters and 19 the lack of FDA enforcement action against Bard. Doc. 9529. The Court denied the 20 motion. Docs. 9881, 10323. 21 The Court found that under Georgia law, which applied in both the Booker and 22 Jones bellwether cases, compliance with federal regulations may not render a 23 manufacturer’s design choice immune from liability, but evidence of Bard’s compliance 24 with the 510(k) process was nonetheless relevant to the design defect and punitive 25 damages claims. Doc. 9881 at 3-4. The Court acknowledged concerns that FDA 26 evidence might mislead the jury or result in a mini-trial. Id. at 5-6 (citing In re C.R. 27 Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair Sys. Prods. Liab. Litig. (Cisson), No. 2:10-CV-01224, 2013 WL 28 3282926, at *2 (S.D.W. Va. June 27, 2013)). But the Court concluded that such concerns 19 1 could adequately be addressed by efficient management of the evidence and adherence to 2 the Court’s time limits for trial, and, if necessary, by a limiting instruction regarding the 3 nature of the 510(k) process. Id. at 6-7.4 4 The Court noted that the absence of any evidence regarding the 510(k) process 5 would run the risk of confusing the jury, as many of the relevant events in this litigation 6 occurred in the context of the FDA’s 510(k) review of the Bard filters and are best 7 understood in that context. Doc. 9881 at 7. Nor was the Court convinced that all FDA 8 references could adequately be removed from the evidence. Id. 9 The Court further concluded that it would not exclude evidence and arguments by 10 Defendants that the FDA took no enforcement action against Bard with respect to the G2 11 or Eclipse filters, or evidence regarding information Bard provided to the FDA in 12 connection with the 510(k) process. Docs. 10323 at 2-3 (Booker), 11011 at 4-5 (Jones). 13 The Court found that the evidence was relevant to the negligent design and punitive 14 damages claims under Georgia law. Id. The Court determined at trial that it had no basis 15 to conclude that the FDA’s lack of enforcement was intended by the FDA as an assertion, 16 and therefore declined to exclude the evidence as hearsay. Doc. 10568 at 87. 17 b. FDA Warning Letter. 18 Defendants moved to exclude evidence of the July 13, 2015 FDA warning letter 19 issued to Bard. Doc. 9864 at 2-3. The Court granted the motion in part, excluding as 20 irrelevant topics 1, 2, 4(a), 4(b), 5, 6, 7, and 8 of the warning letter. Docs. 10258 at 6-8 21 (Booker), 10805 at 1 (Jones), 12736 (Hyde), 17401 at 10 (Tinlin). Topics 1 and 2 22 concern the Recovery Cone retrieval system; Topic 4(a) concerns the filter cleaning 23 process; and Topics 4(b), 5, 6, 7, and 8 concern the Denali Filter. The Court concluded 24 that none of these topics was relevant to the issues in the bellwether cases involving a G2 25 26 27 4 The Court did not find a limiting instruction necessary at the close of either the 28 Booker or Jones trials. See Doc. 10694 at 9. 20 1 filter (Booker), an Eclipse filter (Jones), either a G2X or Eclipse filter (Hyde), and a 2 Recovery filter (Tinlin). Id. 3 The Court deferred ruling on the relevance of topic 3 until trial in all bellwether 4 cases. The Court found that topic 3, concerning Bard’s complaint handling and reporting 5 of adverse events with respect to the G2 and Eclipse filters, as well as the adequacy of 6 Bard’s evaluation of the root cause of the violations, was relevant to rebut the implication 7 at trial that the FDA took no action with respect to Bard IVC filters. See Doc. 10693 8 at 13-15; Doc. 11256. The Court concluded that the warning letter was admissible under 9 Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8), and was not barred as hearsay. Doc. 10258 at 7. The 10 Court further concluded that the probative value of topic 3 was not substantially 11 outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice to Bard under Rule 403. Id. The Court 12 admitted the warning letter in redacted form during the three bellwether trials. See 13 Docs. 10565, 11256, 12736. The Court noted that topic 3 included reference to the G2, 14 the filter at issue in Booker, and reached similar conclusions in Jones and Hyde. 15 Doc. 17401 at 11. The parties disputed the relevance of topic 3 in Tinlin because it did 16 not include reference to the Recovery, the filter at issue in Tinlin. Id. The Court did not 17 decide this issue because the Tinlin case settled. 18 c. Recovery Cephalad Migration Death Evidence. 19 Defendants moved to exclude evidence of cephalad migration (i.e., migration of 20 the filter toward the patient’s heart) by a Recovery filter resulting in patient death. The 21 Court denied the motion for the Booker bellwether trial, which involved a G2 filter. 22 Docs. 10258 at 4-5, 10323 at 4. Defendants have appealed this ruling. Docs. 11934, 23 11953. 24 The Court granted the motion for the Jones bellwether trial, which involved an 25 Eclipse filter, and denied Plaintiff’s requests for reconsideration of the ruling before and 26 during the trial. See Docs. 10819, 10920, 11041, 11113, 11256, 11302; see also 27 Doc. 11409 at 94-96. Plaintiff Jones has appealed those rulings. Docs. 12057, 12071. 28 21 1 The Court granted the motion for the Hyde bellwether trial, which involved either 2 a G2X or Eclipse filter. Doc. 12533 at 6-7. Plaintiff Hyde has appealed this ruling. 3 Docs. 13465, 13480. 4 The Court denied Defendants’ motion for the Tinlin bellwether trial, which 5 involved a Recovery filter. Doc. 17401 at 7-10. The Tinlin case settled before trial. 6 The Court concluded for purposes of the Booker bellwether trial that evidence of 7 cephalad migrations by a Recovery filter resulting in patient death was necessary for the 8 jury to understand the issues that prompted creation and design of the next-generation G2 9 filter, and thus was relevant to Plaintiff’s design defect claims. Doc. 10323 at 4. In 10 addition, because the Recovery filter was the predicate device for the G2 filter in 11 Defendants’ 510(k) submission to the FDA, and Defendants asserted to the FDA that the 12 G2 was as safe and effective as the Recovery, the Court concluded that the safety and 13 effectiveness of the Recovery filter was at issue. Id. The Court was concerned, however, 14 that too heavy an emphasis on deaths caused by cephalad migration of the Recovery 15 filter – a kind of migration which did not occur in the G2 filter generally or the Booker 16 case specifically – would result in unfair prejudice to Defendants that substantially 17 outweighed the probative value of the evidence. Id. Defendants did not object during 18 trial that Plaintiffs were over-emphasizing the death evidence. 19 The Court initially concluded for purposes of the Jones bellwether trial, which 20 involved an Eclipse filter, that evidence of cephalad migration deaths by the Recovery 21 filter was inadmissible because it was only marginally relevant to Plaintiff’s claims and 22 its marginal relevancy was substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice. See 23 Docs. 10819, 10920, 11041, 11113, 11256, 11302. This is because cephalad migration 24 did not continue in any significant degree beyond the Recovery filter; cephalad migration 25 deaths all occurred before the Recovery was taken off the market in late 2005; Ms. Jones 26 did not receive her Eclipse filter until 2010; the Recovery-related deaths said nothing 27 about three of Ms. Jones’ four claims (strict liability design defect and the failure to warn 28 claims); and instances of cephalad migration deaths were not substantially similar to 22 1 complications experienced by Ms. Jones and therefore did not meet the Georgia standard 2 for evidence on punitive damages. Docs. 10819, 11041. 3 The Court also found that deaths caused by a non-predicate device (the Recovery 4 was not the predicate device for the Eclipse in Defendants’ 510(k) submission), and by a 5 form of migration that was eliminated years earlier, were of sufficiently limited probative 6 value that their relevancy was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice 7 because the death evidence may prompt a jury decision based on emotion. Id. The Court 8 further concluded that Plaintiff Jones would not be seriously hampered in her ability to 9 prove Recovery filter complications, testing, and design when references to cephalad 10 migration deaths are removed. Doc. 11041. As a result, the Court held that such 11 references should be redacted from evidence presented during the Jones trial. 12 The Court balanced this concern with the competing concern that it would be 13 unfair for Defendants to present statistics about the Recovery filter and not allow 14 Plaintiffs to present competing evidence that included Recovery deaths. See, e.g., 15 Doc. 11391 at 12. Based on this concern, Plaintiffs argued at various points during the 16 trial that Defendants had opened the door to presenting evidence about Recovery 17 cephalad migration deaths. The Court repeatedly made fact-specific determinations on 18 this point, holding that even though Defendants presented some evidence that made the 19 Recovery evidence more relevant, the danger of unfair prejudice continued to 20 substantially outweigh the probative value of the cephalad migration death evidence. See 21 Docs. 11113, 11302; see also Doc. 11409 at 94-96. 22 The Court concluded for purposes of the Hyde bellwether trial, which involved 23 either a G2X or Eclipse filter, that evidence of Recovery filter cephalad migration deaths 24 should be excluded under Rule 403 for the reasons identified in the Jones bellwether trial. 25 Doc. 12533 at 6-7. The Court concluded that this evidence had marginal relevance to 26 Plaintiff’s claims because Ms. Hyde received either a G2X or Eclipse filter, two or three 27 generations after the Recovery filter; Ms. Hyde did not receive her filter until 2011, more 28 than five years after cephalad migration deaths stopped when the Recovery was taken off 23 1 the market; the deaths did not show that G2X or Eclipse filters – which did not cause 2 cephalad migration deaths – had design defects when they left Defendants’ control; nor 3 did the cephalad migration deaths, which were eliminated by design changes in the G2, 4 shed light on Defendants’ state of mind when designing and marketing the G2X and 5 Eclipse filters. Id. at 7. 6 The Court concluded for purposes of the Tinlin bellwether trial, which involved a 7 Recovery filter, that Recovery deaths and Defendants’ knowledge of those deaths were 8 relevant to Plaintiffs’ design defect claim under Wisconsin law because they went 9 directly to the Recovery’s foreseeable risks of harm and whether it was unreasonably 10 dangerous. Doc. 17401 at 7-8. The Court also concluded that the Recovery death 11 evidence was relevant to Plaintiffs’ failure to warn and concealment claims because it 12 was probative on the causation issue – that is, whether her treating physician would have 13 selected a different filter for Ms. Tinlin had he been warned about the Recovery’s true 14 risks, as Plaintiffs describe them. Id. at 8. In addition, because this evidence would be 15 used to impeach expert testimony from Defendants that the Recovery filter was safe and 16 effective, the Court concluded that substantial similarity was not required. Id. at 8-9. 17 The Court further concluded that the death evidence was relevant to Bard’s state of mind 18 and to show the reprehensibility of its alleged conduct for purposes of punitive damages. 19 Id. at 9-10. The Court reached a different conclusion in the Jones and Hyde cases 20 because cephalad migration deaths stopped when the Recovery was taken off the market 21 in 2005, and the deaths shed little light on Defendants’ state of mind when marketing 22 different, improved filters years later. Id. at 9 n.4. As noted, the Tinlin case settled 23 before trial. 24 d. SNF Evidence. 25 Plaintiffs sought to exclude evidence of complications associated with the SNF, 26 claiming that they were barred from conducting relevant discovery into the design and 27 testing of the SNF under CMO 10. Doc. 10487; see Doc. 1319. The Court denied 28 Plaintiffs’ request. Doc. 10489. The Court did not agree that Plaintiffs were foreclosed 24 1 from obtaining relevant evidence for rebuttal. The Court foreclosed this discovery 2 because Plaintiffs did not contend that the SNF was defective. Id. at 2. Plaintiffs also 3 had rebuttal evidence showing that reported failure rates for SNF were lower than 4 Recovery and G2 failure rates. Id. The Court ultimately concluded it would not preclude 5 Defendants from presenting its SNF evidence on the basis of a discovery ruling and 6 permitted Plaintiffs to make appropriate evidentiary objections at trial. Id. at 3. 7 e. Use of Testimony of Withdrawn Experts. 8 Defendants sought to preclude Plaintiffs’ use at trial of the depositions of three 9 defense experts – Drs. Moritz, Rogers, and Stein – who originally were retained by Bard 10 but were later withdrawn in some or all cases. Doc. 10255 at 2. The Court denied the 11 request in part. Doc. 10382. The Court found that Defendants failed to show that the 12 depositions of these experts were inadmissible on hearsay grounds, but agreed that it 13 would be unfairly prejudicial under Rule 403 to disclose to the jury that the experts 14 originally were retained by Bard. Id. at 2-3. The Court therefore concluded that 15 Plaintiffs could use portions of the experts’ depositions that support Plaintiffs’ claims, but 16 could not disclose to the jury that the experts originally were retained by Bard. Id. at 3. 17 The Court was concerned about the presentation of cumulative evidence, and therefore 18 required Plaintiffs to show that no other expert of similar qualifications was available or 19 that the unavailable expert had some unique testimony to contribute, before the 20 deposition of any withdrawn expert could be used at trial. Id. at 3-4. 21 f. Other Motion in Limine Rulings. 22 Other motion in limine (“MIL”) rulings may be useful to the receiving courts. See 23 Docs. 10075, 10235, 10258, 10947. The courts are referred to the following motions and 24 orders to assist in preparing for trial:5 25 26 5 The Court also ruled on the parties’ MILs concerning several case-specific issues. See Docs. 10075 (Plaintiff’s MIL 12 in Booker), 10258 (Plaintiff’s’ MILs 6 27 and 13 in Booker), 10947 (Defendants’ MIL 1 and Plaintiff’s MILs 1-4 and 7 in Jones), 12533 (Plaintiff’s MIL 3 in Hyde), 17285 (Plaintiff’s MIL 1 in Tinlin), 17401 (Plaintiff’s 28 MILs 2, 3, and 6 in Tinlin). 25 1 • Parties’ Joint Stipulation on MILs in Booker: The Court, on stipulation of 2 the parties, excluded evidence concerning several case-specific issues in the Booker bellwether trial, as well as a few general issues, including: Bard’s 1994 3 criminal conviction; other lawsuits or claims against Bard; advertising by Plaintiff’s counsel; Plaintiff’s counsel specializing in personal injury or 4 products liability litigation; contingency fee agreements; and advertising by 5 any counsel nationally for IVC filter cases. Doc. 10235. 6 • Defendants MIL 1 in Booker: The Court permitted evidence and testimony concerning Recovery complications. Doc. 10258 at 1-5; see Doc. 10819 7 (Jones). As noted above, the Court permitted evidence and testimony concerning Recovery filter cephalad migration deaths in the Booker bellwether 8 trial involving a G2 filter (Doc. 10323 at 4), but excluded such evidence in the trials involving a G2X or Eclipse filter (Docs. 10819, 10920, 11041). 9 • Defendants’ MIL 2 in Booker: The Court permitted evidence and testimony 10 relating to the development of the Recovery filter. Doc. 10258 at 5-6; see Doc. 10819 at 2-3 (Jones). 11 • Defendants’ MIL 4 in Booker: The Court excluded evidence and testimony 12 concerning a photograph of Bard employee Michael Randall making an offensive gesture. Doc. 10075 at 1-2. 13 • Defendants’ MIL 5 in Booker: The Court permitted Plaintiff’s expert 14 Dr. Thomas Kinney to be called as a fact witness, but prohibited him from testifying regarding his prior work for Bard as an expert witness in two prior 15 IVC filter cases or as a paid consultant to Bard. Docs. 10075 at 2-3, 10323 at 4. 16 17 • Plaintiff’s MIL 2 in Booker: The Court reserved ruling until trial on evidence and testimony regarding the nature of Bard’s business, including the nature, 18 quality, and usefulness of its products, the conscientiousness of its employees, and references to its mission statement. Doc. 10075 at 3-4. 19 • Plaintiff’s MIL 3 in Booker: The Court permitted evidence and testimony 20 concerning the benefits of IVC filters, including testimony describing Bard filters as “lifesaving” devices. Doc. 10258 at 8. 21 • Plaintiff’s MIL 4 in Booker: The Court permitted evidence and testimony 22 that IVC filters, including Bard’s filters, are within the standard of care for the medical treatment of pulmonary embolism. Doc. 10258 at 8-9. Defendants 23 agreed to not characterize IVC filters as the “gold standard” for the treatment of pulmonary embolisms. Id. at 8. 24 • Plaintiff’s MIL 5 in Booker: The Court denied as moot the motion to exclude 25 evidence and argument relating to failure rates, complication rates, percentages, or comparative analysis of any injuries that were not produced to 26 Plaintiffs during discovery, as all such information was produced. Doc. 10075 at 4. 27 28 26 1 • Plaintiff’s MIL 7 in Booker: The Court excluded evidence and argument relating to prior judicial opinions about Plaintiffs’ experts, including the 2 number of times their testimony has been precluded in other cases. Id. 3 • Plaintiff’s MIL 8 in Booker: The Court excluded evidence and argument that a verdict against Defendants will have an adverse impact on the medical 4 community, future medical device research or costs, and the availability of medical care. Id. at 4-5. 5 • Plaintiff’s MIL 9 in Booker: The Court deferred ruling on the relevance of 6 statements or lack of statements from medical societies, including the Society 7 of Interventional Radiologists (“SIR”), until trial. Doc. 10258 at 14-18. The Court ultimately admitted this evidence in both the Booker and Jones 8 bellwether trials. 9 • Plaintiff’s MIL 10 in Booker: The Court excluded evidence and testimony that Bard needed FDA consent to add warnings to its labels, send warning 10 letters to physicians and patients, or recall its filters. Id. at 18-19. The Court permitted evidence and argument explaining the reasons why Bard filters were 11 not recalled, FDA’s potential involvement in any recall effort, and the fact that warnings about failure rates and increased risks could not be based on MDR 12 and MAUDE data alone. Id. 13 • Plaintiff’s MIL 11 in Booker: The Court permitted evidence and argument relating to the informed consent form signed by Plaintiff prior to insertion of 14 the IVC filter, even though the form is not specific to IVC filters or Bard filters. Doc. 10075 at 5-6. 15 • Plaintiff’s MIL 14 in Booker: The Court reserved ruling until trial on 16 evidence and argument relating to background information and personal traits of Bard employees and witnesses. Id. at 7. 17 • Plaintiff’s MIL 6 in Jones: The Court permitted evidence and testimony 18 concerning whether a party’s expert had been retained by the same attorneys in 19 other litigation. Doc. 10947 at 8-9. 20 • Plaintiff’s MIL 5 in Jones: The Court excluded evidence and testimony that Bard employees or their relatives have received Bard IVC filter implants. Id. 21 at 9-10. 22 • Defendants’ MIL 2 in Jones: The Court excluded evidence and testimony of other lawsuits against Bard. Id. at 11. 23 • Plaintiff’s MILs 4 and 5 in Hyde: The Court permitted evidence and 24 testimony concerning Bard’s Instructions for Use (“IFU”) and SIR Guidelines. Doc. 12507. 25 • Plaintiff’s MIL 2 in Hyde: The Court permitted evidence and testimony 26 concerning “The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism.” Doc. 12533 at 4-6. 27 • Defendants’ MIL 3 in Hyde: The Court permitted evidence and testimony 28 that Bard’s SNF is a reasonable alternative design. Id. at 7. 27 1 • Defendants’ MIL 4 in Hyde: The Court excluded testimony from Dr. Muehrcke about his personal feelings of betrayal and his moral and ethical 2 issues with Bard’s conduct. Id. at 7-8. 3 • Defendants’ MIL 6 in Hyde: The Court permitted evidence and testimony regarding informed consent. Id. at 8-9. 4 • Plaintiff’s MIL 4 in Tinlin: The Court reserved ruling until trial on evidence 5 and argument relating to a chart created by Defendants from their internal TrackWise database regarding reporting rates of IVC filter complications. 6 Doc. 17401 at 5. 7 • Plaintiff’s MIL 5 in Tinlin: The Court permitted evidence and testimony 8 concerning a chart comparing the sales of the permanent SNF with those of retrievable filters between 2002 and 2016. Id. at 5-6. 9 • Defendants’ MIL 3 in Tinlin: The Court permitted evidence and testimony 10 concerning the Recovery Filter Crisis Communications Plan that Bard had prepared in 2004 to help manage damaging media coverage about a Recovery 11 migration death. Id. at 11-12. 12 • Defendants’ MIL 4 in Tinlin: The Court excluded evidence and testimony concerning Dr. Muehrcke’s untimely disclosed opinion that one of his patients 13 died from cardiac tamponade caused by a fractured strut that had embolized to her heart. Id. at 12-13. 14 15 6. Deposition Designation Rulings. 16 The Court has ruled on numerous objections to deposition designations for trial 17 and refers the transferor courts to the following orders:6 18 19 Deponent Depo. Date Doc. No(s). 20 Bill Altonaga 10/22/2013 10497, 10922 21 Christine Brauer 05/23/2014 10922, 22 08/02/2017 10922 23 David Ciavarella 11/12/2013 10403 24 Gary Cohen 01/25/2017 10438 25 26 27 6 In addition to the depositions identified in the table above, the Court ruled on 28 numerous objections to case-specific deposition designations for trial. 28 1 Deponent Depo. Date Doc. No(s). 2 Robert Cortelezzi 11/11/2016 10438, 11064 3 4 Len DeCant 05/24/2016 10438, 11080 5 John DeFord 06/02/2016 10524, 11080 6 Mary Edwards 01/20/2014 10438 7 Robert Ferrara 04/17/2017 10438 8 Chris Ganser 10/11/2016 10438, 11073 9 10 Jason Greer 08/11/2014 10438, 10922 11 Janet Hudnall 11/01/2013 10403 12 Brian Hudson 01/17/2014 10403 13 John Lehmann 08/07/2014 10922 14 William Little 07/27/2016 10438, 11064 15 16 John McDermott 02/05/2014 10438 17 Patrick McDonald 07/29/2016 10486, 11064 18 Mark Moritz 07/18/2017 10922 19 Daniel Orms 08/16/2016 10403, 11073 20 Abithal Raji-Kubba 07/18/2016 11064 21 Gin Schulz 01/30/2014 10403 22 23 Christopher Smith 08/03/2017 11073 24 William Stavropoulos 02/01/2017 10524 25 Jack Sullivan 11/03/2016 10486, 26 09/16/2016 11080 27 Melanie Sussman 04/07/2017 11073 28 29 1 Deponent Depo. Date Doc. No(s). 2 Mehdi Syed 03/02/2018 11313 3 4 Scott Trerotola 01/20/2017 10524 5 Douglas Uelmen 10/04/2013 10403, 11080 6 Carol Vierling 05/11/2016 10486, 11073 7 Mark Wilson 01/31/2017 10922 8 Natalie Wong 10/18/2016 10403 9 10 7. Subject Matter Jurisdiction Ruling. 11 The parties identified cases in the MDL for which federal subject matter 12 jurisdiction does not exist. Doc. 20210; see also Doc. 21410-7. No federal question 13 jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 because the master complaint asserts no 14 federal claim and the state law claims alleged in the complaint do not depend on the 15 resolution of a federal law question. Doc. 364 ¶¶ 166-349. For purposes of diversity 16 jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, Defendant C. R. Bard, Inc. is a citizen of New Jersey 17 and Defendant Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. is a citizen of Arizona. See id. ¶¶ 11-12. 18 Thus, complete diversity between the parties does not exist in any case where each 19 Defendant is a named party and Plaintiff is a resident of either Arizona or New Jersey. 20 See Doc. 20210-1. 21 Plaintiffs in most of the cases without subject matter jurisdiction agreed to a 22 dismissal without prejudice. See id. Plaintiffs in other cases opposed dismissal, but 23 provided no reason why the cases should not be dismissed. See id. The Court dismissed 24 without prejudice multiple cases for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Docs. 20667, 25 21461. Some of these cases may be refiled in state court. See Doc. 20210-1. 26 27 28 30 1 I. Further Proceedings in Remanded or Transferred Cases. 2 1. General Discovery. 3 Because all general fact and expert discovery has been completed in this MDL, the 4 courts receiving these cases need not be concerned with facilitating general expert, 5 corporate, and third-party discovery. This observation is not meant to restrict the power 6 of receiving courts for good cause or in the interest of justice to address issues that may 7 be unique and relevant in a remanded or transferred case. 8 2. Case-Specific Discovery and Trial Preparation. 9 According to the parties, the status of the remaining discovery and other pretrial 10 issues for the cases being remanded or transferred, and the estimated time needed to 11 resolve such issues and make the cases ready for trial, will be determined on remand or 12 transfer. Final trial preparation in the bellwether trials was governed by certain Court 13 orders. See Docs. 8871, 10323, 10587, 11011, 11320, 11321, 11659, 11871, 12061, 14 12853, 12971. 15 J. Documents to Be Sent to Receiving Courts. 16 If the Panel agrees with the Court’s suggestion of remand of the cases listed on 17 Schedule A and issues a final remand order (“FRO”), the Clerk of the Court for this 18 District will issue a letter to the transferor courts, via email, setting out the process for 19 transferring the case. The letter and certified copy of the FRO will be sent to the 20 transferor courts’ email addresses. 21 The parties have submitted a stipulated designation of record for remanded cases. 22 Doc. 19444-1; see J.P.M.L Rule 10.4(a). Upon receipt of the FRO, the Clerk of this 23 District shall transmit to the transferor court the following: (1) a copy of the individual 24 docket sheet for the remanded action, (2) a copy of the master docket sheet in this MDL, 25 (3) the entire file for the remanded action, as originally received from the transferor 26 district, and (4) the record on remand designated by the parties. See Doc. 19444-1; 27 J.P.M.L Rule 10.4(b). 28 31 1 The Court has concluded that the cases listed on Schedule B should be transferred 2 to appropriate districts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Upon receipt of this transfer 3 order, the Clerk for this District shall follow the same procedures prescribed above for 4 each of the individual cases listed on Schedule B. 5 If a party believes that the docket sheet for a particular case being remanded or 6 transferred is not correct, a party to that case may, with notice to all other parties in the 7 case, file with the receiving court a designation amending the record. Upon receiving 8 such designation, the receiving court may make any needed changes to the docket. If the 9 docket is revised to include additional documents, the parties should provide those 10 documents to the receiving court. 11 IV. Conclusion. 12 Pursuant to J.P.M.L. Rule 10.1(b)(i), the Court suggests that the Panel remand the 13 cases listed on Schedule A to the transferor districts for further proceedings. The Clerk 14 shall forward a certified copy of this order to the Panel. 15 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), the Clerk of this District is directed to transfer 16 the cases listed on Schedule B to appropriate districts for further proceedings. 17 The Clerk of this District is directed to unconsolidate from the MDL the cases 18 listed on Schedule C. These cases will remain in the District of Arizona and be assigned 19 to the undersigned judge. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated this 6th day of March, 2020. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 32 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule A – Cases to be Remanded to Transferor Courts (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Current Case Number Transferor Court and Case Number Christiansen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00645 PHX DGC Alaska, No. 3:15-cv-00228 JWS Leus v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:15-cv-01623 PHX DGC Mo. W.D., No. 4:13-cv-00585 Beal v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:15-cv-02648 PHX DGC N.C. W.D., No. 5:15-cv-00143 Keegan v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:15-cv-02642 PHX DGC Pa. M.D., No. 1:15-cv-02152 JEJ Hans v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00546 PHX DGC Cal. S.D., No. 3:15-cv-2627 JM-JMA Shinn v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00596 PHX DGC Cal. N.D., No. 3:15-cv-06041-LB Schweska v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:15-cv-01879 PHX DGC Ill. C.D., No. 3:15-cv-03193 SEM-TSH Winland v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:15-cv-01878 PHX DGC Ill. C.D., No. 2:15-cv-02144-CSB-EIL Rodrigue v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:15-cv-02462 PHX DGC La. E.D., No. 2:15-cv-5920 Langford v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00687 PHX DGC Mo. E.D., No. 4:15-cv-01749 NNC Duran v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00610 PHX DGC N.M., No. 1:15-cv-01159 Epps v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:15-cv-01881 PHX DGC Nev., No. 2:15-cv-01210 GMN-GWF Voight v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:15-cv-01915 PHX DGC Okla. E.D., No. 6:15-cv-00239 SPS Mears v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:15-cv-01899 PHX DGC Pa. M.D., No. 1:15-cv-01253 JEJ Peery v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:15-cv-01883 PHX DGC Tenn. W.D., No. 1:15-cv-01153 JDB-EGB Miller v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:15-cv-01639 PHX DGC Tenn. M.D., No. 3:15-cv-00533 Rocourt v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01796 PHX DGC Md., 1:18-cv-01484 Rouse v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:15-cv-02227 PHX DGC Cal. N.D., No. 5:15-cv-04569 BLF Morgan v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:15-cv-01925 PHX DGC Tex. E.D., No. 6:15-cv-00603 MHS-JDL Eaker v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:15-cv-02573 PHX DGC Tex. E.D., No. 6:15-cv-00952 MHS-JDL Stringer v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00988 PHX DGC N.J., No. 2:16-cv-00913 SDW-LDW Powell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02234 PHX DGC Va. W.D., No. 6:16-cv-00026 Watson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02753 PHX DGC N.J., No. 2:16-cv-02576 Spencer v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02751 PHX DGC N.J., No. 2:16-cv-02573 Townsend v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02824 PHX DGC N.J., No. 2:16-cv-02577 Treinavicz v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02752 PHX DGC N.J., No. 2:16-cv-02574 1 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule A – Cases to be Remanded to Transferor Courts (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Current Case Number Transferor Court and Case Number Lauhoff v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00507 PHX DGC Tex. S.D., No. 2:16-cv-00004 Johnston v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04089 PHX DGC R.I., No. 1:16-cv-00578 Banks v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01071 PHX DGC La. M.D., No. 3:17-cv-00193 Crawford v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03526 PHX DGC Ga. N.D., No. 1:16-cv-03657 2 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Constance A. Hamby v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00158 Ala. M.D. Carolyn Gibson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00917 Ala. M.D. John Chatham v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03598 Ala. M.D. Thomas Jimmerson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04837 Ala. M.D. William King v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00075 Ala. M.D. Karlie Armstrong v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04678 Ala. M.D. Nancy Hoffmann v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03651 Ala. M.D. Joyce Lane v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02077 Ala. M.D. Robert K. Mayes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04360 Ala. M.D. Azile Rogers v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00033 Ala. M.D. Jerome Trailer v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:18-cv-04850 Ala. M.D. Jennifer Harrelson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04750 Ala. M.D. Tommy Lee Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00643 Ala. N.D. Bruce Reynolds v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:17-cv-02354 Ala. N.D. Douglas Holland v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:17-cv-03388 Ala. N.D. Danny McWilliams v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:17-cv-00673 Ala. N.D. Michael Gilliam v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:18-cv-00763 Ala. N.D. Jeff Hudson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04142 Ala. N.D. Shelia Thomas v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:19-cv-03709 Ala. N.D. RT Robinson v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:17-cv-01697 Ala. N.D. Abigail Morgan v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:17-cv-02419 Ala. N.D. Christina Major v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01144 Ala. N.D. Rickey D. Barker v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04263 Ala. N.D. Brittany Hughes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01471 Ala. N.D. Sandra Clifton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02181 Ala. N.D. Tommie E. Belcher, Sr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03131 Ala. S.D. 1 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Paul Lang v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:19-cv-03888 Ala. S.D. Carolyn S. Hatcher v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03678 Ala. S.D. Dexter T. Law v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00272 Ala. S.D. Timothy Brossett v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03715 Ala. S.D. Dorothy Durden v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:18-cv-01826 Ala. S.D. Christopher Hogue v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03724 Ala. S.D. Mercedes Robinson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00047 Ala. S.D. Slater Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:16-cv-03205 Ala. S.D. Melissa S. Johnson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00702 Ark. E.D. Clevester Akins, Sr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00203 Ark. E.D. Windy Ivory v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:16-cv-03335 Ark. E.D. Gloria Lewis v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03579 Ark. E.D. Roberta Lowe v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03218 Ark. E.D. Wanda Martin v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03896 Ark. E.D. Mark Morehead v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01299 Ark. E.D. James Heitzman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02377 Ark. E.D. Deborah Seay v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03284 Ark. E.D. Shannon Anderson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02873 Ark. E.D. Davey Lee v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02678 Ark. E.D. Berthena Nunn v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03829 Ark. E.D. Danna Walker v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00365 Ark. E.D. Jimmy Howard Brown v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01651 Ark. E.D. Melinda Ruth v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04782 Ark. E.D. Elzia Bolt v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00141 Ark. E.D. Robert Hall v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01021 Ark. E.D. Gina Fleming v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03701 Ark. W.D. 2 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Jackie L. Satterfield v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03573 Ark. W.D. Melissa McCollum v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02974 Ark. W.D. Chad Ashley v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02416 Ark. W.D. Ron Peerson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01822 Ark. W.D. Christopher Roy v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02870 Ark. W.D. Johnny Reeves v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00023 Ark. W.D. Steven Hughes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02011 Ark. W.D. Don Stilwell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01357 Ark. W.D. Richard Chazel v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04150 Ark. W.D. John Olim v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03960 Cal. C.D. Rachel Lund v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00707 Cal. C.D. Michael Gill v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00025 Cal. C.D. Joseph Bartlett v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01398 Cal. C.D. Martha Hawkins v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00815 Cal. C.D. China Cook v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00271 Cal. C.D. Mary Fisher v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02453 Cal. C.D. Reginald Franklin v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00195 Cal. C.D. Maria Martinez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01820 Cal. C.D. Christina Aleman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04066 Cal. C.D. Evans Erik v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02591 Cal. C.D. Dennis Simon v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03717 Cal. C.D. Maria Rizo v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01256 Cal. C.D. Terrance Carrington v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02080 Cal. C.D. Mary Adams v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02070 Cal. C.D. Beatriz Arriola Dadisman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03848 Cal. C.D. Laronda S. Kelley v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00698 Cal. C.D. 3 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Youlanda Harrell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02693 Cal. C.D. Randy Snyder v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03025 Cal. C.D. Vicky Miller v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03886 Cal. C.D. Novella Ferguson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03864 Cal. C.D. Ron Maez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03990 Cal. C.D. Vernon A. Gresham v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03219 Cal. C.D. Frank Tolerico v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02829 Cal. C.D. John Hinchman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00025 Cal. E.D. Norma Molina v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01977 Cal. E.D. Bonnie Krieger v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:18-cv-00870 Cal. E.D. Melissa Turner v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00285 Cal. E.D. Luz Licea v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02205 Cal. E.D. Sandra Wilson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02594 Cal. E.D. Michael Butler v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04791 Cal. E.D. Daryl Bond v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02848 Cal. E.D. Karen Hayes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02417 Cal. E.D. James Bradburn, Sr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03394 Cal. E.D. Justo Camarena, Jr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. : 2:16-cv-02101 Cal. E.D. Stacy McGillivary v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04000 Cal. N.D. Rickey Evans v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02308 Cal. N.D. Jeremiah Hawkins v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01044 Cal. N.D. Andrew Knight v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02630 Cal. N.D. Martha Bess England Harp v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02633 Cal. N.D. Dale Burlington v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04289 Cal. N.D. Timothy Miller v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01115 Cal. N.D. Adam T. Tran v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00535 Cal. S.D. 4 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District John Carrasco v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04011 Cal. S.D. D. Jean Grey v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03883 Cal. S.D. Megan Thomas v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02297 Cal. S.D. Patricia Cortes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00272 Cal. S.D. Janet Wilcox v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00067 Cal. S.D. Jenny Lopez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02639 Cal. S.D. Lloyd Lewis v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04930 Cal. S.D. Dennis Mata v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04802 Cal. S.D. Marchita Allen v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01835 Colo. Diane E. Kirkland v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03653 Colo. Aaron Newton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03547 Colo. Courtney Jefferson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00300 Colo. Lyndol Aumiller v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02932 Colo. Lynn Gissen v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04793 Conn. Christopher Grasso v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03411 Conn. Sandra G. Gandel v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03076 Conn. Brenda LaGasse v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02828 Conn. Stanley Cooper v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03805 Conn. Carter S. Williams v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03505 Conn. Joseph Johnson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01298 Conn. Thomas Dechello v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00092 Conn. Michael Giordano v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01995 Conn. Terri Bartis v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04348 Conn. Sally Baez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02304 Conn. Margaret Santos v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03696 Conn. Patrick Simard v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01462 Conn. 5 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Brenda Waldner v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00170 Conn. Tara Applewhite v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03182 D.C. Brenda Stratton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02162 Del. Michael Reeves v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00744 Del. James Watkins v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00053 Del. William Jones v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01696 Del. Donna Jean Taylor v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02218 Fla. M.D. James Bass v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02000 Fla. M.D. Walter Hunter v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03174 Fla. M.D. Stephen Leslie v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02694 Fla. M.D. Karen L. Whaley v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04651 Fla. M.D. Keith Dingman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02321 Fla. M.D. Jamaal Barnett v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04069 Fla. M.D. Mary Kendrick v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02198 Fla. M.D. Gary Evans v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04078 Fla. M.D. Martha A. Patterson Mendes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00250 Fla. M.D. Kelly Shedd v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01024 Fla. M.D. Donald Marsh v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02006 Fla. M.D. Harry Osborn v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04331 Fla. M.D. Kevin Ames v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02165 Fla. M.D. Robert W. Bersey, Sr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03887 Fla. M.D. James Riner, Jr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04652 Fla. M.D. Brenda Horne v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02012 Fla. M.D. Christopher Zagorski v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04721 Fla. M.D. Christy Hicks v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02661 Fla. M.D. Jacqueline D. Davy v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01030 Fla. M.D. 6 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District James Davyd Hall v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01612 Fla. M.D. Patrick A. Arnold v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02658 Fla. M.D. Yade Diaz v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04709 Fla. M.D. Sharleatha Morgan v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04780 Fla. M.D. Margaret J. Warren v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03889 Fla. M.D. Charles Williams v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03405 Fla. M.D. Albert Berliner v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04309 Fla. M.D. Bruce Ramsbottom v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00464 Fla. M.D. Kenneth Zelenak v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03247 Fla. M.D. Lesette Weaver v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03140 Fla. M.D. Debra Jaramillo-Toriz v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04877 Fla. M.D. Dodi Froehlich v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00338 Fla. M.D. Robert Perez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04785 Fla. M.D. Karen F. Nails-Porter v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00676 Fla. M.D. Coleene Kwiatkowski v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00811 Fla. M.D. Carmen M Rivera v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02478 Fla. M.D. Wayne Mills, v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01399 Fla. M.D. Kimberly Matthews v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:18-cv-04862 Fla. M.D. Patricia Davis v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00368 Fla. M.D. Donna Kritchen v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04737 Fla. M.D. Laura Ray v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00008 Fla. M.D. Carolyn Kriebel v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04102 Fla. M.D. Neal Keller v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03300 Fla. M.D. Lynda Kendrick v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00036 Fla. M.D. Mary Ellen Wetzel v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03843 Fla. M.D. Betty L. French v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01267 Fla. M.D. 7 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Juli Collins v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02036 Fla. M.D. Joy Ann Brown v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04264 Fla. M.D. Glen Watson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00793 Fla. M.D. Julia Walker v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01504 Fla. M.D. Deborah Powell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02137 Fla. M.D. Alexander Fernandez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03875 Fla. M.D. Samuel Plant v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03885 Fla. M.D. Jimmie Ortiz v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04775 Fla. M.D. Timothy Denison v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03859 Fla. M.D. John Dedon v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04729 Fla. M.D. Eric Renegar v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03963 Fla. M.D. Patsy Williams v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02161 Fla. M.D. Kathleen Difulvio v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04724 Fla. M.D. Zelda Thompson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04052 Fla. M.D. Elsie Carr v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03403 Fla. M.D. Judas Riley Martinez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00059 Fla. M.D. Farah E. Radjewski v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00187 Fla. M.D. Katelyn Rose Wills v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00301 Fla. M.D. William Barron v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02863 Fla. M.D. Eboni Gray v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04041 Fla. M.D. Donald Fine v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03395 Fla. M.D. Charles T. Bawcom v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04631 Fla. N.D. Timothy Walker v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00024 Fla. N.D. Jolene Morris v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01008 Fla. N.D. Janet Cushman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03337 Fla. N.D. Frederick Fiore v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03895 Fla. N.D. 8 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Sharon Gasparian v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01458 Fla. N.D. Donald G. Allen, Jr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03587 Fla. N.D. Timothy R. Dean v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03353 Fla. N.D. Michael L. Warner v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02300 Fla. N.D. Frances L. Burton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00392 Fla. N.D. Winford A. Kelly v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02246 Fla. N.D. Shalom Benjamin v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03451 Fla. N.D. Debra Martin v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02731 Fla. N.D. Jacqueline Trabal v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04804 Fla. N.D. Mary Cooper v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02102 Fla. N.D. Emily Bagley v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00268 Fla. S.D. Kristin Dobreuenaski v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02849 Fla. S.D. William Alfonso v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04616 Fla. S.D. Kendra McKinney v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03937 Fla. S.D. Kerrie Taylor v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01536 Fla. S.D. Paul Rumer v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00125 Fla. S.D. Lois Daley v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01037 Fla. S.D. Delorise Johnson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00162 Fla. S.D. Sheila Kennedy v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00742 Fla. S.D. David Philmore v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00074 Fla. S.D. Darryl B. Thomas v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04193 Fla. S.D. Alice Gomes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00054 Fla. S.D. Amparo Pastor v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02443 Fla. S.D. Carol Burns-Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03655 Fla. S.D. Seth Baum v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02247 Fla. S.D. Vincent Moore v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04038 Fla. S.D. 9 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Donnell Ballard v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03400 Fla. S.D. Joseph P. McTommoney, Jr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02618 Fla. S.D. Angel Gines v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03747 Ga. M.D. Richard W Powell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01990 Ga. M.D. Rachel Ferraris v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00261 Ga. M.D. Amanda Lee v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01822 Ga. M.D. Martin DeJesus v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00073 Ga. M.D. Antonio Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00529 Ga. M.D. Kendrick Brown v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03705 Ga. M.D. Buffy Bryant v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00061 Ga. M.D. Fellini Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00204 Ga. M.D. Fredrick Chambers v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00030 Ga. N.D. David Goodall, Jr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03712 Ga. N.D. Megeline Edwards v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00278 Ga. N.D. Darlene McMillian v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00083 Ga. N.D. Diance Lewis-Rivers v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01811 Ga. N.D. Kevin Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00107 Ga. N.D. Evelyn Cater v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00159 Ga. N.D. Jacqueline Harmon v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02756 Ga. N.D. Cindy Murr v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00220 Ga. N.D. Elizabeth Ross v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01519 Ga. N.D. Linda Wright v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02951 Ga. N.D. Paulette Durden v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02310 Ga. N.D. Alfreda Logan v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03093 Ga. N.D. Jennifer McCrory v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03024 Ga. N.D. William Stephens v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01658 Ga. N.D. 10 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Tamara Shepherd v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02306 Ga. N.D. Penelope Trudeau v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04256 Ga. N.D. Edward Mcelheney v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04203 Ga. N.D. Jeanette M. Woods v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04177 Ga. N.D. Carolena DeMille v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04831 Ga. N.D. Sheila Finch v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04731 Ga. N.D. Thomas Bellamy v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00034 Ga. N.D. Robin Carter v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00047 Ga. N.D. Walter Eldridge v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03957 Ga. N.D. Charles Fagan v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02779 Ga. N.D. Steven Zuspann v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02919 Ga. N.D. Donna F. Bryson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04074 Ga. N.D. Lawrence Konrad v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03717 Ga. N.D. Margaret Willard v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04574 Ga. N.D. Herbert Dean v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04928 Ga. S.D. Kimberly Plantrich v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02161 Ga. S.D. Barbara Gunter v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03798 Ga. S.D. Wanda Quarles v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01054 Ga. S.D. Lazaundra Kellam v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00816 Ga. S.D. Cheryl Stubbs v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00719 Ga. S.D. Sabrina Collier v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03102 Ga. S.D. Tony Jerome Hamm v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03782 Ga. S.D. John Dean v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01299 Ga. S.D. Roy Walker v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02820 Ga. S.D. Robin Williams v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01385 Ga. S.D. Shirley Fennell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02843 Ga. S.D. 11 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Deon Fuller v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02029 Ga. S.D. Clifford Washington v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01867 Ga. S.D. Brandon McCormick v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00244 Ga. S.D. Ruth E. Delbrugge v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00534 Hawaii Jo Ann Scott v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03114 Iowa N.D. Stacy Levell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03861 Iowa N.D. Mary Graves v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04332 Iowa N.D. Shawn White v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01100 Iowa N.D. Monique Williams v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00757 Iowa N.D. Joy Denton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04111 Iowa S.D. Pamela Lara v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04796 Iowa S.D. Donna Marie Farrington v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02700 Idaho Rebecca L. Haremaker v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00788 Ill. C.D. Wanda Rossmiller v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01010 Ill. C.D. Rebecca Brewster v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03939 Ill. C.D. Maggie Walden v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00420 Ill. C.D. Debbie Barnhart v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01151 Ill. C.D. Richard Griffieth v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03936 Ill. C.D. Elizabeth Buccini v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04854 Ill. C.D. Victor Baker v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03087 Ill. C.D. Nichole Payney v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03827 Ill. C.D. Cynthia Gibson-Mason v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01353 Ill. C.D. Michael King v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00067 Ill. C.D. John Marshall v. C. R. Bard, Inc., 2:16-cv-00701 Ill. C.D. Kathleen Fox v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04217 Ill. C.D. Barbara Meinholdt v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02118 Ill. C.D. 12 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Vicki Reazer-Kremitzki v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04798 Ill. C.D. Debra Andrews v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04789 Ill. C.D. Mary B. Sekera v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00789 Ill. N.D. James Flint v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03929 Ill. N.D. Reginald Carter v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04054 Ill. N.D. Darrick Mitchell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04001 Ill. N.D. Cheryl Booth v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04220 Ill. N.D. Vicky Drolet v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03854 Ill. N.D. James Anderson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03928 Ill. N.D. Sylvia Brito v. C. R. Bard, Inc., 2:16-cv-00900 Ill. N.D. Ben Anderson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03676 Ill. N.D. Lawrence E Murphy v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03815 Ill. N.D. Loretta Randle v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03644 Ill. N.D. Thomas Shervino v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03711 Ill. N.D. Yokovanda Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03465 Ill. N.D. Lori Stanko v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02615 Ill. N.D. Naurice Wade v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03089 Ill. N.D. Ruth Haberstich v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03882 Ill. N.D. Ruth Wade v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01147 Ill. N.D. Harold A. Dohe v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04192 Ill. N.D. Jennifer M. Micek v. C. R. Bard Inc. 2:16-cv-01054 Ill. N.D. Marilyn E. Hall v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02890 Ill. N.D. John Rinaldo v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04937 Ill. N.D. Ancel Cornejo v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04163 Ill. S.D. Jennifer Dickerson v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:16-cv-03716- Ill. S.D. Robert Delmore v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03623 Ill. S.D. 13 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District David Shaw v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02078 Ill. S.D. Rodrick Harris v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00145 Ill. S.D. John M. Evers v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00321 Ind. N.D. Brent Miller v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04762 Ind. N.D. Donna Rychlock v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:19-cv-02127 Ind. N.D. Brittany Brown v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04037 Ind. N.D. John Ellet v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03851 Ind. N.D. Patti Ann Clark v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04679 Ind. S.D. Donald Torelli v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01308 Ind. S.D. Connie Whitecotton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00814 Ind. S.D. Georgia Sarivalas v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03959 Ind. S.D. Rita Dempsey v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03150 Ind. S.D. Louis Whyde v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03823 Ind. S.D. Sherry A. Scofield v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04522 Kan. Lori Martin v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00010 Kan. Dana Daniels v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00333 Kan. Christopher VanNatta v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01049 Kan. Scott Bain v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02881 Kan. Jerry Buchan v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03214 Kan. Esther Chavez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03984 Kan. Athena Fagan v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03964 Kan. Claudia Payne v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04037 Kan. Earlene Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02557 Kan. Darleen Barnes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03901 Kan. Randy J. Frederick v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04637 Kan. Karen Kidwell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00324 Kan. 14 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Nancy Williams v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04402 Kan. William Duff v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04361 Ky. E.D. Carl Marshall v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03714 Ky. E.D. Rodney Wagers v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03112 Ky. E.D. Monda Morris v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02617 Ky. E.D. Mildred S. Dennis v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03113 Ky. E.D. Terry McCutcheon v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03094 Ky. E.D. allihan, Denine v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01005 Ky. E.D. Sherri D. Childers v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04226 Ky. E.D. Jerry Neal Coleman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00644 Ky. E.D. Clora Crace v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01677 Ky. E.D. Frank Gillum v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02714 Ky. E.D. John Lawson, Sr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00081 Ky. E.D. George Price v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02629 Ky. E.D. Sonya Risner v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04767 Ky. E.D. Margaret Sprague v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00181 Ky. E.D. Joyce Staton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00039 Ky. E.D. Teresa Syzemore v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03306 Ky. E.D. Tiffany Hall v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01099 Ky. E.D. Linda Coleman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01427 Ky. E.D. Desiree Thompson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02279 Ky. E.D. Clifton Powell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04808 Ky. E.D. Terry Haney v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03032 Ky. E.D. Terry L. West v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:17-cv-02440 Ky. W.D. Richard Head v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00660 Ky. W.D. Michaele A. Edmondson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00009 Ky. W.D. 15 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Larenda F. Whitaker v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00008 Ky. W.D. Beth Russell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03923 Ky. W.D. Nash Zehnder v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03199 Ky. W.D. Tiffany Ort v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00048 Ky. W.D. Johnnesia Powell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01935 Ky. W.D. Shelia Sloan v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02525 Ky. W.D. Anthony Floyd v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02079 Ky. W.D. Debbie Nunn v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03279 Ky. W.D. Melissa Belisle v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01188 Ky. W.D. Michael Fitzpatrick v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01189 Ky. W.D. D'Andre Windfield v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02533 La. E.D. Daniel R. Melton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03680 La. E.D. Marylin A. Mayo v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03679 La. E.D. Terrence Dunnaway v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04749 La. E.D. Randolph Alcorn v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02929 La. E.D. Peggy C. Duhe v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:16-cv-03359 La. E.D. Ke'Andra Hookfin v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04316 La. E.D. Mary Self v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02562 La. E.D. Rickey Paul v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01702 La. M.D. Roger Boutwell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00365 La. M.D. Justina Francis v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00531 La. W.D. Mona Morgan v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03836 La. W.D. Dwayne Handy v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04159 La. W.D. Nicholas Mullins v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04761 Mass. Richard Heyes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02952 Mass. Paul Brown v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02823 Mass. 16 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Amanda Sestito v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04172 Mass. Juanita Leighton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02227 Mass. Brian O'Regan v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01958 Mass. Christine Yacubacci v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02459 Mass. Margaret Berry-Boles v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01022 Mass. Jim Gingras v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02387 Mass. Zachary MacDonald v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02634 Mass. William Melanson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02757 Mass. Michele Coren v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00353 Mass. Tajuanna Douglas v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03863 Md. Corrine Stevenson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04781 Md. Michael Pinkett v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01537 Md. Alicia Cook-Middleton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04236 Md. Stacy Sanders v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04252 Md. Lisa Cerny v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04148 Md. Nanette Evans v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02267 Md. Salvador Varela Linares v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03860 Md. Antonio Lonesome v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02369 Md. Katherine Tarleton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00045 Md. Lillian Himbrick v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02301 Md. Kathleen Gerard v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00711 Md. James Markley v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00117 Md. Billy Stillwell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04834 Md. Tammy Cianferano v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04790 Md. April Buracker v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00121 Md. Carlton Holloway, Jr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00813 Md. 17 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Sherrill Calloway v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00084 Md. Linda Crutchfield v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02642 Md. Steve Leavelle v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04169 Md. Lisa Tabron v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02299 Md. Teresa Drake v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03027 Md. Andrius Drazdys v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00012 Md. Brenda L. Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04016 Mich. E.D. Gregory Kansier v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03091 Mich. E.D. Alexander Jankowski v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04853 Mich. E.D. Rodney Haskins v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02737 Mich. E.D. Raymond Kurzer v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04836 Mich. E.D. Jennifer Watson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04784 Mich. E.D. Cynthia Shults v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04935 Mich. E.D. Leslie Uphaus v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02298 Mich. E.D. Patricia Watkins v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04198 Mich. E.D. Dwight Hobbs v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00176 Mich. E.D. Theresa Shannon v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00009 Mich. E.D. Jannice Carter v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02633 Mich. E.D. Robert Mashburn v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02541 Mich. E.D. Johnnie Maye v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00731 Mich. E.D. Tanya McFarlin v. C. R. Bard, Inc., 2:19-cv-04037 Mich. E.D. Danyalle Peterson-Chappell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01695 Mich. E.D. James Hall v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02290 Mich. E.D. Christen Scott v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02072 Mich. W.D. Cindy Lou Titus v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02161 Mich. W.D. Chad Gerkin v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02643 Mich. W.D. 18 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District John Coles v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03891 Mich. W.D. Timothy Hammill v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03674 Mich. W.D. Roberta Eller v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02379 Mich. W.D. Allison Tomasi v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02467 Mich. W.D. Leonard Wolfe v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:19-cv-02128 Mich. W.D. Dale Flynn v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00200 Mich. W.D. Russell Wonsey v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02744 Mich. W.D. Darrin Meister v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03884 Minn. Donald Larry Elliott v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02623 Minn. Sondra Kay DeWerd v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03869 Minn. David Beck v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04228 Minn. Charlene Jotblad v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01996 Minn. Terrence Lee Kutz v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01268 Minn. Mia Sofio v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00952 Minn. Aune Leppala v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03276 Minn. Amy L. Eggers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01803 Minn. David Capriglione v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00621 Mo. E.D. Laurie McMillan v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03888 Mo. E.D. Doris Marie Thompson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03230 Mo. E.D. Kyle Pryor v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03839 Mo. E.D. Robert Ward v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03504 Mo. E.D. Keith Grah v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03955 Mo. E.D. Deborah Sullins v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03902 Mo. E.D. Marion A. Green v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01780 Mo. E.D. Regina Anderson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04740 Mo. E.D. Arnold Siefker v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00267 Mo. W.D. 19 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Marcia Chatfield v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02226 Mo. W.D. Christopher Waring v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04849 Mo. W.D. Vernon Cotter v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02160 Mo. W.D. Ronald Anderson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04843 Mo. W.D. Donald Lamore v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04855 Mo. W.D. Carol Sadler v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02681 Mo. W.D. Toni Pierce v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03378 Mo. W.D. Patricia Coffey v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03988 Mo. W.D. Brenda Sottler v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04910 Mo. W.D. Larry Coleman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03615 Mo. W.D. Steven Heidrich v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02648 Mo. W.D. Angel Kay Capps v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02712 Mo. W.D. Jacky Gross v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04813 Mo. W.D. Francine Harrington v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04840 Mo. W.D. Kathy Roos v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03549 Mo. W.D. Patrick Sansonetti v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02153 Mo. W.D. Robert Leonard Kieser v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01074 Mo. W.D. Michael Johnson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00031 Mo. W.D. Frank Benanti v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01940 Mo. W.D. Ian Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04019 Mo. W.D. Michael Martinez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00048 Mo. W.D. Raymond Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04932 Mo. W.D. Larry Mace v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01993 Mo. W.D. Richard Phillips v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03386 Mo. W.D. Jennifer Gillespie v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01517 Miss. N.D. Teresa Carroll v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03026 Miss. N.D. 20 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Lakeya Humphrey v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00675 Miss. N.D. Steven Lair v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04865 Miss. N.D. Rebecca Parkman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04026 Miss. N.D. Ella Williams v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02874 Miss. N.D. Brian McDill v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01746 Miss. N.D. Robert Howie v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00722 Miss. N.D. Junior H. Binkard v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04126 Miss. N.D. Thelma Evans v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03943 Miss. N.D. William Neely, IV v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04848 Miss. N.D. Julian E. Johnson, III v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01153 Miss. N.D. Kathy Bowlin v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02824 Miss. N.D. David Terry v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03900 Miss. S.D. Sharon Weems v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03139 Miss. S.D. Marian Davis v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00046 Miss. S.D. Billy R. Leist v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01386 Miss. S.D. Carl R. Williams v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03650 Miss. S.D. Barbara Williams v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03834 Miss. S.D. Keisha Gilmore v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03456 Miss. S.D. Brenda Horhn v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03959 Miss. S.D. Annette D. Tyler v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00281 Miss. S.D. Tony Farmer v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00057 Miss. S.D. Luke Cook v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00722 Miss. S.D. William Fennell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02877 Miss. S.D. Patricia A. Hinton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01163 Miss. S.D. Duane Wick v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04357 Miss. S.D. Mose Arrington v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04746 Miss. S.D. 21 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Jerry Bynum v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03254 Miss. S.D. Bennie Craft v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00032 Miss. S.D. Edward Crosby v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03487 Miss. S.D. John Gallemore v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04245 Miss. S.D. April Guinn v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02714 Miss. S.D. Angela Magee v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02788 Miss. S.D. Pearl Palmeri v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02296 Miss. S.D. Korondia Goodman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04771 Miss. S.D. Marshell Jones v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04723 Miss. S.D. Lindall Winston v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03190 Miss. S.D. Ricky Blakeney v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03094 Miss. S.D. Taneka Garth v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03639 Miss. S.D. Brenda Gray v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04753 Miss. S.D. Rebecca Parkman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03818 Miss. S.D. Joel Hale v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02953 Mont. Maria Dalbotten v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02275 Mont. Jerald Philp v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02139 Mont. Salvatore DeAngelo v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04353 Mont. Alice Copley v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04065 N.C. E.D. Joseph Dagenhart v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01665 N.C. E.D. Michael Ferguson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00362 N.C. E.D. Dalton Fleming v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03838 N.C. E.D. Jerome E. Fogg, Jr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03620 N.C. E.D. Frank Fuller v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00106 N.C. E.D. Nellie Graham v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00650 N.C. E.D. Denise Jolly v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01007 N.C. E.D. 22 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Christopher Jones v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02660 N.C. E.D. Vickie Mason v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01031 N.C. E.D. Larry Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02004 N.C. E.D. Melissa Boldry v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:18-cv-02906 N.C. M.D. James Fuller v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04289 N.C. M.D. Theresa Long v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02306 N.C. M.D. Tracy Moore v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04803 N.C. M.D. Stephanie Murriell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03580 N.C. M.D. Richard Owens v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00321 N.C. M.D. Glenn Paige v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04909 N.C. M.D. Matthew Rimmer v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04772 N.C. M.D. Angelique Tyler v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04103 N.C. M.D. William Wade v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01664 N.C. M.D. Angelique Wiles v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03401 N.C. M.D. Lori Angus v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04347 N.C. W.D. Christopher Draper v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04938 N.C. W.D. Todd Ferguson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00266 N.C. W.D. Francis Ford v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04734 N.C. W.D. Garland Laws v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02418 N.C. W.D. George Leonhardt v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01832 N.C. W.D. Phillip D. Simmons v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04549 N.C. W.D. Brian L. Stout v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02707 N.C. W.D. Ronald Jarecke v. C. R. Bard, Inc., 2:16-cv-01290 Neb. Vickie Miller v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00737 Neb. James Ferguson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03918 N.H. Mark Gain v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04769 N.J. 23 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Lenore Kirkland v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00946 N.J. Carmen Alvarez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03403 N.J. Edgar Barbot v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04906 N.J. James Whitmore v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00042 N.J. Deana Cheek v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04936 N.J. Sharon Kay Thacker v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:18-cv-02563 N.J. Rhonda Lange v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02560 N.J. Debra Rose v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04733 N.J. Mable E. Brown v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02163 N.J. Michael Gipson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01021 N.J. Tammy Michelle Alford v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02561 N.J. William Ford v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04792 N.J. Rodney Lyons v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04830 N.J. Janice Masiejczyk v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04800 N.J. Robin Morgan v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04774 N.J. Ronnie Beachum v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04653 N.J. Carlos Paniagua v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02298 N.M. Thomas Ulibarri v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03892 N.M. Maria B. Sanchez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04490 N.M. John R. Levendoski v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03986 N.M. Michael Candelaria v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04349 N.M. Donna Gillaspie v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01415 N.M. Tod M. Dericco v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03461 Nev. Lindi Duran v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04634 Nev. Corrie Gita v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02556 Nev. Dorothy Harris v. C. R. Bard, Inc.- 2:19-cv-03881 Nev. 24 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Beverly Hardy v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03954 Nev. George Custer v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03215 Nev. Gailyn Hall v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04816 Nev. Robert Buran v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03879 Nev. Lisa Riley v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00896 Nev. Penny Graboyes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04079 Nev. Jerry Patchman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00072 Nev. Debra Schwartzmiller v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03201 Nev. Jordan Lynch v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02586 Nev. Randall McCown v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03143 Nev. Lanette Tingling v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03837 N.Y. E.D. Christine Lagano v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02825 N.Y. E.D. Karin N. Lisowski v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00906 N.Y. E.D. Theresa Reynolds-McDonnell v. C. R. Bard, 2:16-cv-00524 N.Y. E.D. Inc. Arleen Jobo-Elzweig v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02005 N.Y. E.D. Betty L. Byrne v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04321 N.Y. E.D. Dorothy Barrow v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02720 N.Y. E.D. Phillip Jackman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03176 N.Y. E.D. Darnell Brown v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00728 N.Y. E.D. Courtney Downing v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03697 N.Y. E.D. Henry Bingell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03103 N.Y. N.D. Paul C. Kelly v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02826 N.Y. N.D. Kathryn M. Downs V. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01730 N.Y. N.D. David R. Jackman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03217 N.Y. N.D. Gary Sargeant v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02561 N.Y. N.D. 25 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Tia L. LaFlesh v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02065 N.Y. N.D. Zaquan J. Walley v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01003 N.Y. N.D. Jody Wiedenbeck v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04783 N.Y. N.D. Kenya Roldan v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01807 N.Y. N.D. Laura Cook v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02680 N.Y. N.D. Brian Rosato v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03899 N.Y. N.D. Justine Jakubowski v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02138 N.Y. N.D. Rosemond Lamb v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01998 N.Y. N.D. Susan Cluff v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:19-cv-02646 N.Y. N.D. Peter P. Michalski v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00154 N.Y. N.D. Karlene Olivet-Healy v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00066 N.Y. S.D. Patrick Clark v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02289 N.Y. S.D. Emily Small v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01256 N.Y. S.D. Robert Arneth v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02146 N.Y. S.D. Jeffrey Donnelly v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04847 N.Y. S.D. Christine Post v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04786 N.Y. S.D. Brooke Seda v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02368 N.Y. S.D. Elizabeth Train v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03880 N.Y. S.D. Steven Simon v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02074 N.Y. S.D. William T Thomas v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01989 N.Y. S.D. Sandra DeMasi v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00343 N.Y. S.D. Racquel Charlemange v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00057 N.Y. S.D. James Conklin v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03619 N.Y. S.D. Arturo Rodriguez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03119 N.Y. S.D. Richard Bull, Sr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01997 N.Y. W.D. Mark H. Felschow v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00001 N.Y. W.D. 26 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Freedom Zybert v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00002 N.Y. W.D. James A. Dier v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03857 N.Y. W.D. Glenn Carrington v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02587 Ohio N.D. Jeff Keel v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01726 Ohio N.D. Alicia L. Kuwik v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03831 Ohio N.D. Jeremy Oakes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01597 Ohio N.D. Betty Brown v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02951 Ohio N.D. Debra A. Gorski v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03238 Ohio N.D. Sandra Jean Caudle v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03588 Ohio N.D. Jenalee Hinds v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:16-cv-04355 Ohio N.D. Bari L Lawson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03844 Ohio N.D. William Cunion v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00701 Ohio N.D. Frances Welch v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02641 Ohio N.D. Rex Mahlman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04738 Ohio N.D. Teresa Osborne v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04599 Ohio N.D. Kelly Wells v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04497 Ohio N.D. Rodney Hall v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00355 Ohio N.D. Cindy McElroy v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03900 Ohio N.D. Melody Balogh v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01821 Ohio N.D. Michelle L. Grant v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00899 Ohio N.D. Greg Cannon v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00221 Ohio S.D. Melissa Kinney v. C. R. Bard, Inc. - 2:17-cv-03243 Ohio S.D. Alice F. Gonzalez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03372 Ohio S.D. Dawn Jackson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00874 Ohio S.D. William Mehl v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04160 Ohio S.D. Tyler M. Moore v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01123 Ohio S.D. 27 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District John B. Mashburn v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:17-cv-01673 Ohio S.D. Arthur Bush v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02850 Ohio S.D. Brigitte Carter v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02513 Ohio S.D. William C. Jackson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03907 Ohio S.D. Edward Charles McIntyre v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03454 Ohio S.D. Clyde S Murriel v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02040 Ohio S.D. Jennifer Dilgard v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04788 Ohio S.D. James Marok v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04863 Ohio S.D. James Barkley v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01291 Ohio S.D. Paula E. Mallory v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00319 Ohio S.D. Lezli Styndl v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00920 Ohio S.D. Dianne Shirley v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00698 Ohio S.D. Makea Williams v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03703 Okla. E.D. Charles Cates v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01023 Okla. N.D. Cecil Evans v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01174 Okla. N.D. Allen Berryhill v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04336 Okla. N.D. Katherine Parker v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03092 Okla. N.D. Tracy Prim v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02644 Okla. W.D. Clarence Urbin v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00269 Okla. W.D. Mary Inman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04929 Okla. W.D. Mary Huston v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:17-cv-00302 Okla. W.D. Nellene S. Perry v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03927 Okla. W.D. Michael Dillon v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03673 Okla. W.D. Anita Martin v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04934 Okla. W.D. Denise Swint v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04845 Okla. W.D. Carolyn Warren v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03285 Ore. 28 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Deborah Boyd v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02769 Ore. Tammy Harmon v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02003 Pa. E.D. Larry Hawkey v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01999 Pa. E.D. Jane Doszpoly v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00342 Pa. E.D. Toni M. Jansen v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01902 Pa. E.D. Joseph Santori v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03970 Pa. E.D. Isa Mota v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02657 Pa. E.D. Eric Giwerowski v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00252 Pa. E.D. Thomas P. Torpey v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:16-cv-00151 Pa. E.D. Denise Strickland v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01529 Pa. E.D. Nancy Atkinson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02862 Pa. E.D. Angenette Jacobs v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00807 Pa. E.D. George Lozinak v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00326 Pa. E.D. Eleanor McCabe v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03898 Pa. E.D. Lawrence Spencer v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03972 Pa. E.D. Lisa Berstler v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04856 Pa. E.D. Christina Beth Sutherland v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00717 Pa. E.D. Lisa Bartlow v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00050 Pa. M.D. Robert Wagner v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00270 Pa. M.D. Joseph Rubino v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04656 Pa. M.D. Donald Shultz, Jr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01843 Pa. M.D. Randy Orso v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04779 Pa. M.D. Deon Brauer v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02131 Pa. M.D. Christopher Andrejko v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02876 Pa. M.D. Linda Ritts v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02853 Pa. M.D. James Weinsheimer v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00446 Pa. M.D. 29 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Cathy Barrick v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03406 Pa. M.D. Nancy Bishop v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01475 Pa. M.D. Mary Blouch v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02592 Pa. M.D. Marie Ryan v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04169 Pa. M.D. Joseph Janosov v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04736 Pa. M.D. Nicholas Vlastaris v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03832 Pa. M.D. Mark Fagotti v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01257 Pa. M.D. Jodi Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00143 Pa. M.D. David Watkins, III v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01528 Pa. M.D. Maryjane Kudelin v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00119 Pa. M.D. Lisa Piper v. C. R. Bard, Inc. - 2:17-cv-02595 Pa. M.D. Pamela Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00916 Pa. M.D. Daniel Confer v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03078 Pa. W.D. Jane A. Steinmetz v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01344 Pa. W.D. Stephen Figard v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00312 Pa. W.D. Shawnee Papincak v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01974 Pa. W.D. Daniel Walk v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00049 Pa. W.D. Eugene T. Steffanus v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00748 Pa. W.D. Lynette Leavell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00625 Pa. W.D. Joshua P. Luchkiw v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00830 Pa. W.D. Patrick Rabickow v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04225 Pa. W.D. Brandon Shea v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04028 Pa. W.D. Wayne Sundmacher v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03030 Pa. W.D. Daniel Forbus v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03636 Pa. W.D. Janice Wray v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03070 R.I. Kathleen Clark v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02611 S.C. 30 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Virginia Lorey v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04931 S.C. Sheila Kimmons v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02879 S.C. Ingrid Robbins v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04795 S.C. Sherry Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04846 S.C. David Pendino v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02248 S.C. Mattie Schoultz v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00103 S.C. Douglas Goodwin v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00108 S.C. John Louis Cureton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04015 S.C. John W. Etters v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02359 S.C. Derrick Horn v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02358 S.C. Carol Blankenship v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03594 S.C. Jeromna Press v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02370 S.C. Kyana Brickley v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03706 S.C. Kenneth L. Dixon, Jr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03920 S.C. Clifton Evans v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04083 S.C. Douglas Fisher, Jr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01732 S.C. Ann Marie Gardner v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03090 S.C. James McMillian v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00118 S.C. Drayco Mattison v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03820 S.C. Terry Davis v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04907 S.C. Justin Ard v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03672 S.C. Melvin Lilly v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03969 S.C. Roger Merritt v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03845 S.C. Caldwell Pinckney v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01799 S.C. Eugene Houg v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03731 S.D. Robert V. Steffen v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04216 S.D. 31 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Joseph Lenins v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04547 Tenn. E.D. Ellen E Maggard v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03692 Tenn. E.D. Daniel Arrington v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02931 Tenn. E.D. Catherine Guinn v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:18-cv-02889 Tenn. E.D. Coty Pennington v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02935 Tenn. E.D. Ryan Grimes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04621 Tenn. E.D. Pamela Jean Caldwell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03144 Tenn. E.D. Brenda Collins v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02955 Tenn. E.D. Mary S. Kanipe v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02735 Tenn. E.D. Teresa Rigsby v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02898 Tenn. E.D. Jamie M. Barrow v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00126 Tenn. E.D. Zachary Leamon v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01251 Tenn. E.D. Kurt Stagmaier v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02619 Tenn. E.D. Jeanne Griggs v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03200 Tenn. E.D. John Wilson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04517 Tenn. E.D. Tiffany McRae v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02708 Tenn. E.D. Teresa Evans v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02743 Tenn. M.D. Melvin S. Daniel v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03306 Tenn. M.D. Douglas Carrick v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03935 Tenn. M.D. Gregory Mason v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04839 Tenn. M.D. James Craighead v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03913 Tenn. M.D. Suellen Highers v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03283 Tenn. M.D. Tamra Swafford v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03825 Tenn. M.D. Teddy Sims v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02630 Tenn. M.D. Jeffrey Ellis v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00681 Tenn. M.D. William Mayberry v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04089 Tenn. M.D. 32 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District William Meiser v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04291 Tenn. W.D. Wanda Johnson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02827 Tenn. W.D. Herbert Waldon v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04754 Tenn. W.D. Carolyn Jones v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02965 Tenn. W.D. Tina Crow-Jordan v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01642 Tenn. W.D. Lisa Sneed v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02716 Tenn. W.D. Sam Naifeh v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02932 Tenn. W.D. Sandra Dee Boxx v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02338 Tenn. W.D. Jimmy Jones, II v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03376 Tenn. W.D. Elsie Murren v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02064 Tenn. W.D. Barbara Stanley v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:19-cv-02163 Tenn. W.D. Wanda Taylor v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00078 Tenn. W.D. Alvin Robbins v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02919 Tenn. W.D. Robert Webber v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01652 Tenn. W.D. Christopher Oliver v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04136 Tenn. W.D. Jerlene Brown v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04209 Tenn. W.D. Herbert Bays v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02830 Tenn. W.D. Gwendolyn Kennedy v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00937 Tex. E.D. Cynthia Houston v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00320 Tex. E.D. Juanita Hamilton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04328 Tex. E.D. Dennis Walter v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04812 Tex. E.D. Dani Simien v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03655 Tex. E.D. Wendell Williams v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04805 Tex. E.D. Kevin Lumpkin v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00530 Tex. E.D. Ellis Phillips v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02847 Tex. E.D. Silas Wilburn v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:19-cv-02649 Tex. E.D. 33 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Lamond Griffith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00720 Tex. E.D. William Swope v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03848 Tex. E.D. Shirley Pierce v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02214 Tex. E.D. Marvin D. Pate v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03669 Tex. E.D. Rebecca Towery v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04833 Tex. E.D. Chad McConnell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04658 Tex. E.D. Edward R. Williams v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04320 Tex. E.D. Larry Tatom v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04801 Tex. E.D. Anna M. Hoyle le v. C. R. Bard, Inc., 2:16-cv-01157 Tex. N.D. Jimmy Sullivan v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02949 Tex. N.D. Thomas Decoopman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03933 Tex. N.D. Carla Ogidiagba v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01155 Tex. N.D. Loretta Alaway v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00105 Tex. N.D. Michael Pediman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02593 Tex. N.D. Beverly Crosby v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00013 Tex. N.D. Nannette Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:15-cv-02635 Tex. N.D. Denise Brewer v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04735 Tex. N.D. Will Mitchell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02002 Tex. N.D. James George v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00708 Tex. N.D. Gladys Davis v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03570 Tex. N.D. Jennifer L. Lentz v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00903 Tex. N.D. Sandra Thompson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01899 Tex. N.D. Charles Phariss v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04832 Tex. N.D. Ana Arellano v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02632 Tex. N.D. Darlene Dianne Morgan v. C. R. Bard, Inc. - 2:18-cv-04614 Tex. N.D. Marilyn Glasscock v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04354 Tex. N.D. 34 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Raymond Andrews v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04740 Tex. N.D. Ashley Covington v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04040 Tex. N.D. Nancy Yeary v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03958 Tex. N.D. Angela VanCleve v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01154 Tex. N.D. Brookie Mears v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01466 Tex. N.D. Milagros R. Silva v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04152 Tex. S.D. Lorraine M. Clark v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03438 Tex. S.D. Shane Broussard v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00022 Tex. S.D. Mandy Oyugi v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02827 Tex. S.D. Shari Curry v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03622 Tex. S.D. Roy Parrish, Jr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00082 Tex. S.D. Michael Thomas v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00358 Tex. S.D. Barbara Stephens v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00738 Tex. S.D. Warren Taft v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02846 Tex. S.D. Claudia G Murdoch v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02891 Tex. S.D. Porfirio Lopez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02869 Tex. S.D. Lorenzo Reyes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02913 Tex. S.D. Reymundo Rivera v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04125 Tex. S.D. Lisa Jones v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04908 Tex. S.D. Roman Alvarez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04615 Tex. S.D. Destinee Benedict v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02303 Tex. S.D. Janine Johnson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01543 Tex. S.D. Colleen Moore v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04809 Tex. S.D. Komlavi Koumado v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01384 Tex. S.D. Scharrien Walker v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04122 Tex. S.D. Felecia Burell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02736 Tex. S.D. 35 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Mona Davis v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03180 Tex. S.D. Linda R. Mills v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00320 Tex. S.D. John D. Gonzales v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04632 Tex. S.D. Zoela Brown-Jackson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04841 Tex. S.D. Johnny Heath v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03642 Tex. S.D. Sandy Mattern v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01708 Tex. S.D. Steve Wooten v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03704 Tex. S.D. Dixie Ruiz v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04245 Tex. S.D. Richard Dabbs v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04654 Tex. W.D. Misti Lynn Lane v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02821 Tex. W.D. Naomi Brewer v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00303 Tex. W.D. Mark R. Atkins v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00279 Tex. W.D. Ramona Werst v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01301 Tex. W.D. Timothy Hernandez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03666 Tex. W.D. James Gregory Naylor v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01741 Tex. W.D. Jesse Olivarri v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03389 Tex. W.D. Ann M. Hernandez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03387 Tex. W.D. William Snyder v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04817 Tex. W.D. Janice L. Blakley v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00317 Tex. W.D. Mary Mitchell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00766 Tex. W.D. Joseph Sanchez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02164 Tex. W.D. Crystal Gaitan v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02544 Tex. W.D. Facunda O. Casarez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03862 Tex. W.D. Ian Seidler v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00021 Tex. W.D. Nikie Konecki v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01235 Tex. W.D. Eli Greenbaum v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00592 Tex. W.D. 36 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Cheryl Miller v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03192 Utah Elizabeth Petersen v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04747 Utah Vyrl Alcorn v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03248 Utah Shireka Dembo v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02538 Va. E.D. Cynthia Lewis v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04751 Va. E.D. John Masiello, Jr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04722 Va. E.D. Bibi Arasteh v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04730 Va. E.D. Sherry Voit-Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01709 Va. E.D. Loraine Brown v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02659 Va. E.D. Ronald Alexander v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02071 Va. E.D. Glenn Fries v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00080 Va. E.D. Marie Majdalawi v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03893 Va. E.D. Gary Brooks v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02651 Va. E.D. Jonathan Butler v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02872 Va. E.D. Loretta Fitzgerald v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02952 Va. E.D. David C. Thompson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00697 Va. E.D. Ruth Chavarri v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04260 Va. E.D. Latoya Stump v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03656 Va. E.D. Charles Andrews v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00972 Va. E.D. Roger Houchens v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00729 Va. W.D. Lawrence W Divers v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03677 Va. W.D. Michael D. Blankenship v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01625 Va. W.D. Kevin Elliot v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00379 Va. W.D. Donna Martin v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03674 Va. W.D. Christopher Starnes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01257 Va. W.D. Linda Jackson v. C. R. Bard, Inc 2:19-cv-02647 Va. W.D. 37 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District David Dilbeck v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02103 Va. W.D. Melinda P. Jefferson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01002 Vt. Linda J Szablewski v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01440 Wa. E.D. Justin Hall v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01372 Wa. W.D. Jianhong Cao v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02288 Wa. W.D. Brenda Anarde v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02871 Wa. W.D. Kimberly Gibson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00712 Wa. W.D. Sharon Haug v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04098 Wa. W.D. Timothy Sollie v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02292 Wa. W.D. Rodney Ehli v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03407 Wa. W.D. Carol Baker v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-03266 Wa. W.D. Ruth Jones v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03803 Wa. W.D. Gary Hostetler v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03404 Wa. W.D. Bruce Vannausdle v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04267 Wa. W.D. Nancy Hollender v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04844 Wa. W.D. Dawn M. Hendrickson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-00318 Wa. W.D. Alan Meaux v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03284 Wa. W.D. Daquita Jordan v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03402 Wis. E.D. Irene Edlebeck v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02631 Wis. E.D. Albert R. Gosenheimer v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04489 Wis. E.D. Collin Lambert v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01096 Wis. E.D. Khalilah Muhammad v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01697 Wis. E.D. Tricia Rees v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00252 Wis. E.D. Robert Urbush v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03202 Wis. E.D. Rogers King v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02302 Wis. E.D. Travis McKeefry v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00741 Wis. E.D. 38 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District Sandra Jends v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00115 Wis. E.D. Jeffrey Jorgensen v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00739 Wis. E.D. Laura M. Koerber v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02294 Wis. E.D. Cynthia Bradbury v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01006 Wis. E.D. Cathy Melinski v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03708 Wis. E.D. Jennifer LaRoche v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02168 Wis. E.D. Robert Eddy v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02634 Wis. E.D. Shaquavia Harris v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02559 Wis. E.D. April Scott v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03023 Wis. E.D. Shelly L. Burns v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04927 Wis. E.D. Robert Heitzler v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-01352 Wis. W.D. Lyle Muszynski v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02736 Wis. W.D. Kendall Armagost v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00512 Wis. W.D. Richard Armand Bois v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00077 Wis. W.D. James Salter v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00810 Wis. W.D. Michael Berg v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03591 Wis. W.D. Yvonne Miller v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00035 W.V. N.D. Maxine Blankenship v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00180 W.V. S.D. Daniel McCloud v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01992 W.V. S.D. Nina Ruth Meadows v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-03675 W.V. S.D. Sabrina Simpkins v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02610 W.V. S.D. Robert Cottrell v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02898 W.V. S.D. Pamela Lemon v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02889 W.V. S.D. Kevin Knapp v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00299 W.V. S.D. Jackie C. Roberts v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01653 W.V. S.D. Kevin Conley v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04159 W.V. S.D. 39 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641- SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule B – Direct-Filed Cases to Be Transferred (Amended) (March 6, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Transferee District John Craven v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02645 W.V. S.D. Donnie Varney v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-01407 W.V. S.D. Richard Fatony v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-04252 W.V. S.D. Teresa Byrne v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-02098 W.V. S.D. Joseph Brown v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00575 Wyo. 40 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule C – Arizona Cases to Be Unconsolidated from the MDL (March 4, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Plaintiff’s Residence Proper Venue Eileen Shea v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03088 NY D. Ariz. Hughey J. Lambert v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-01085 NC D. Ariz. Billy Shaw v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04120 NC D. Ariz. Timothy Pinegar v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-03071 TN D. Ariz. Linda H. Reynolds v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00072 TX D. Ariz. Jennifer Hans v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04013 TX D. Ariz. Johnnie G. Brock v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03900 KY D. Ariz. Arlee Lowery v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-02615 AL D. Ariz. Guadalupe Moreno v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:16-cv-04315 TX D. Ariz. Margaret C. Moses v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00161 VA D. Ariz. Linda Smothermon v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01451 TX D. Ariz. Dorothy Jones v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00196 TX D. Ariz. Dawn Boyd v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02319 DE D. Ariz. Michael Rodriguez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-02305 AL D. Ariz. Wendi Williams v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01713 TX D. Ariz. Paula Jones v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03881 TX D. Ariz. Daniel Gutierrez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-04726 TX D. Ariz. Nitasha Sherman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-00585 MI D. Ariz. Jerry Carrington v. C.R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02040 TN D. Ariz. Donald Lewis v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00813 TN D. Ariz. Shannon Taylor v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-00821 AL D. Ariz. Sandy Mendoza v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-01191 TX D. Ariz. Charmaine Miller v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02952 OH D. Ariz. Bonnie J. Thacker v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:17-cv-03903 KY D. Ariz. Joseph Caputo v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-02878 AZ D. Ariz. Donald Wright v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00051 AZ D. Ariz. In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Schedule C – Arizona Cases to Be Unconsolidated from the MDL (March 4, 2020) Case Caption Case Number Plaintiff’s Residence Proper Venue Michael Parr v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:18-cv-04797 AZ D. Ariz. Jeanne Hunt v. C. R. Bard, Inc. 2:19-cv-00011 AZ D. Ariz. In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 1 – MDL Orders CASE MANAGEMENT ORDERS (CMOs) Date Filed Doc. No. Docket Text 10/30/2015 248 CMO 1 re Leadership Counsel Appointments 11/16/2016 4016 Amended CMO 1 re Leadership Counsel Appointments 03/21/2017 5285 Second Amended CMO 1 re Plaintiff Leadership Team 02/04/2019 15098 Third Amended CMO 1 re Plaintiff Leadership Team 10/30/2015 249 CMO 2 re Setting Deadlines, First Phase of Discovery 12/01/2015 314 CMO 3 re Non-waiver Order Pursuant to Rule 502(d) 12/17/2015 363 CMO 4 re Master Complaint, Responsive Pleadings, Short Form Complaint, Waiver, and Answer 3/17/2016 1108 Amended CMO 4 re Master Complaint, Responsive Pleadings, Short Form Complaint, Waiver, and Answer 4/20/2016 1485 Second Amended CMO 4 re Master Complaint, Responsive Pleadings, Short Form Complaint, Waiver, and Answer 12/17/2015 365 CMO 5 re Plaintiff and Defendant Profile Forms 03/03/2016 927 Amended CMO 5 re Plaintiff and Defendant Profile Forms 12/18/2015 372 CMO 6 re Rules to Establishing Common Benefit Fee 01/05/2016 401 CMO 7 re Stipulations Concerning Redactions 02/02/2016 519 CMO 8 re Second Phase of Discovery 03/31/2016 1259 CMO 9 re ESI and production protocol 04/01/2016 1319 CMO 10 re Second Phase Discovery, Bellwether, ESI, FDA, Deposition, and Privilege Log 05/05/2016 1662 CMO 11 re Bellwether Selection Process 05/05/2016 1663 CMO 12 re Joint Record Collection 06/21/2016 2238 CMO 13 re ESI, FDA Warning Letter and Designations 06/21/2016 2239 CMO 14 re Deposition Protocols 1 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC CASE MANAGEMENT ORDERS (CMOs) Date Filed Doc. No. Docket Text 08/25/2016 3214 CMO 15 re Lexecon Waivers, ESI Discovery, Multi-plaintiff Actions, and Deceased Plaintiffs 08/25/2016 3215 CMO 16 re Deadlines Related to Barraza 12/02/2016 4141 Amended CMO 16 re Deadlines Related to Barraza 09/14/2016 3372 CMO 17 re Protective Order and Expedited ESI Production 11/16/2016 4015 Amended CMO 17 re Protective Order and Redactions of Material from Expedited ESI Production 10/17/2016 3685 CMO 18 re Adjusted Discovery Schedule 12/13/2016 4311 CMO 19 re ESI and Bellwether Selection 12/22/2016 4335 CMO 20 re Discovery Deadlines for Discovery Group 1 and Bellwether Group 1 02/06/2017 4866 CMO 21 re Discovery Protocols for Discovery Group 1 02/17/2017 5007 CMO 22 re Setting Deadlines 05/05/2017 5770 CMO 23 re Expert Deposition Deadlines, Bellwether Case Selection, Preemption Motion for Summary Judgment, and Mature Cases 05/19/2017 5881 CMO 23 re Discovery Protocols for Bellwether Group 1 05/19/2017 5883 Amended CMO 24 re Discovery Protocols for Bellwether Group 1 06/06/2017 6227 CMO 25 re Bellwether Group 1 Amended Discovery Schedule 07/17/2017 6799 CMO 26 re Depositions of Dr. Henry and Dr. Altonaga, Communications among Plaintiffs’ Experts, and Bellwether Trial Issues 10/10/2017 8113 CMO 27 re Privilege Issues, Bellwether Trial Schedule, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and Recusal Unnecessary 11/21/2017 8871 CMO 28 re Booker Bellwether Trial Schedule, and Mature Cases 2 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC CASE MANAGEMENT ORDERS (CMOs) Date Filed Doc. No. Docket Text 12/21/2017 9415 CMO 29 re Booker Bellwether Trial Schedule, Motion to Certify Appeal, and Cisson Motion Briefing 01/23/2018 9775 CMO 30 re Motions Hearings, Motions in Limine, and Punitive Damages in Booker 03/02/2018 10323 CMO 31 re Booker Trial 05/07/2018 11011 CMO 32 re Jones Trial 06/01/2018 11320 CMO 33 re Mulkey as Next Bellwether Selection, and Mulkey Trial Schedule 06/28/2018 11659 CMO 34 re Next 3 Bellwether Trials, Kruse Trial Schedule, Use of Dr. Kandarpa at Trial, Sixth Bellwether Tinlin, Disposition of SNF Cases, and Remand of Mature Cases 07/13/2018 11871 CMO 35 re September, November and May Bellwether Trials, and Hyde September Bellwether Trial Schedule 08/02/2018 12061 CMO 36 re Tinlin Bellwether Pre-trial Schedule 10/04/2018 12830 CMO 37 re Hyde Trial 10/05/2018 12853 CMO 38 re Future Bellwether Trials, February and May Bellwether Trials, Motion to Seal Trial Exhibits, Settlement Talks and Remand, and SNF Cases 10/16/2018 12971 CMO 39 re Tinlin Bellwether Case 11/08/2018 13329 CMO 40 re Mulkey Bellwether Trial 02/08/2019 15176 CMO 41 re Tinlin Trial, SNF Cases, Remand of Mature Cases, and Possible Settlement Procedures 03/21/2019 16343 CMO 42 re Tinlin Trial, SNF Cases, Duplicative Cases, Settlement Procedures and Remand or Transfer 05/02/2019 17494 CMO 43 re Tinlin Trial, Common Benefit Fund Fee and Expense Accounts, Closing Date for New Cases and Remand or Transfer, and SNF Cases 3 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC DISCOVERY ORDERS Date Filed Doc. No. Docket Text 10/30/2015 249 CMO 2 re Setting Deadlines, First Phase of Discovery 02/02/2016 519 CMO 8 re Second Phase of Discovery 03/31/2016 1259 CMO 9 re Electronically Stored Information and production protocol 04/01/2016 1319 CMO 10 re Second Phase Discovery, Bellwether, ESI, FDA, Deposition, and Privilege Log 05/05/2016 1663 CMO 12 re Joint Record Collection 06/21/2016 2238 CMO 13 re ESI, FDA Warning Letter and Designations 06/21/2016 2239 CMO 14 re Deposition Protocols 08/25/2016 3214 CMO 15 re Lexecon Waivers, ESI Discovery, Multi-plaintiff Actions, and Deceased Plaintiffs 08/29/2016 3272 Order re Deposition of Jim Beasley 09/06/2016 3312 Order re discovery disputes concerning Plaintiffs’ communications with FDA 09/06/2016 3313 Order re Plaintiffs’ communications with NBC or other media outlets and admissibility at trial 09/06/2016 3314 Order re Plaintiffs’ third party funding arrangements 09/14/2016 3372 CMO 17 re Protective Order and Expedited ESI Production 11/16/2016 4015 Amended CMO 17 re Protective Order and Redactions of Material from Expedited ESI Production 09/16/2016 3398 Order re ESI generated by foreign entities that sell filters abroad 10/17/2016 3685 CMO 18 re Adjusted Discovery Schedule 12/13/2016 4311 CMO 19 re ESI and Bellwether Selection 12/22/2016 4335 CMO 20 re Discovery Deadlines for Discovery Group 1 and Bellwether Group 1 12/24/2016 4339 Order re proposed depositions of and interrogatories to Plaintiffs’ counsel 4 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC DISCOVERY ORDERS Date Filed Doc. No. Docket Text 02/06/2017 4865 Order re discovery dispute on ex parte communications with treating physicians and depositions of treating physicians and sales representatives 02/06/2017 4866 CMO 21 re Discovery Protocols for Discovery Group 1 05/05/2017 5770 CMO 23 re Expert Deposition Deadlines, Bellwether Case Selection, Preemption Motion for Summary Judgment, and Mature Cases 05/19/2017 5881 CMO 23 re Discovery Protocols for Bellwether Group 1 05/19/2017 5883 Amended CMO 24 re Discovery Protocols for Bellwether Group 1 06/06/2017 6227 CMO 25 re Bellwether Group 1 Amended Discovery Schedule 07/17/2017 6799 CMO 26 re Depositions of Dr. Henry and Dr. Altonaga, Communications among Plaintiffs’ Experts, and Bellwether Trial Issues DISCOVERY AND PRIVILEGE ORDERS Date Filed Doc. No. Docket Text 12/01/2015 314 CMO 3 re Non-waiver Order Pursuant to Rule 502(d) 02/11/2016 699 Order re Motion for Protective Order concerning Dr. John Lehmann's December 15, 2004, report as protected work product 07/25/2016 2813 Order re Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel (Privilege Log Issues) 02/06/2017 4865 Order re discovery dispute on ex parte communications with treating physicians and depositions of treating physicians and sales representatives 07/17/2017 6799 CMO 26 re Depositions of Dr. Henry and Dr. Altonaga, Communications among Plaintiffs’ Experts, and Bellwether Trial Issues 5 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC DISCOVERY AND PRIVILEGE ORDERS Date Filed Doc. No. Docket Text 10/10/2017 8113 CMO 27 re Privilege Issues, Bellwether Trial Schedule, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and Recusal Unnecessary 10/20/2017 8315 Order that Plaintiffs need not produce the withheld expert communications or provide a privilege log on these communications to Defendants. DAUBERT ORDERS Date Filed Doc. No. Docket Text 12/21/2017 9428 Order re Motion to Disqualify Plaintiffs' Expert Thomas Kinney, M.D. 12/21/2017 9432 Order re Motion to Disqualify Plaintiffs' Experts Drs. Resnick, Vogelzang, and Desai 12/22/2017 9433 Order re Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs' Experts Drs. Parisian and Kessler 12/22/2017 9434 Order re Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs' Experts Drs. Kinney, Roberts, and Kalva 01/22/2018 9770 Order re Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs' Expert Dr. Eisenberg 01/22/2018 9771 Order re Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs' Expert Dr. Muehrcke 01/22/2018 9772 Order re Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs' Expert Dr. Hurst 01/22/2018 9773 Order re Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs' Expert Dr. Betensky 02/06/2018 9991 Order re Motion to Exclude Bard's Expert Dr. Grassi 02/08/2018 10051 Order re Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs' Expert Dr. McMeeking 02/08/2018 10052 Order re Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs' Expert Dr. Ritchie 02/12/2018 10072 Order re Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs' Experts Drs. Garcia and Streiff 02/21/2018 10230 Order re Motion to Exclude Bard's Experts Drs. Grassi and Morris 6 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC DAUBERT ORDERS Date Filed Doc. No. Docket Text 02/21/2018 10231 Order re Motion to Exclude Bard's Expert Dr. Morris 04/16/2019 16992 Order re Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs’ Expert Dr. McMeeking 04/23/2019 17285 Order re Motion to Exclude Bard’s Expert Dr. Morris MOTIONS IN LIMINE ORDERS Date Filed Doc. No. Docket Text 01/23/2018 9775 CMO 30 re Motions Hearings, Motions in Limine, and Punitive Damages in Booker 01/26/2018 9861 Joint Stipulation re prohibiting raising certain issues in the presence of the jury for Booker Bellwether case 01/29/2018 9881 Order re admissibility of (1) pre-market clearance of Bard IVC filters by FDA and (2) the lack of FDA Enforcement Action against Bard 02/15/2018 10075 Order re Motions in Limine re Photographs of Mike Randall, Dr. Kinney work for Bard, Benevolent Activities, Evidence Not Produced in Complaint Files, Prior Judicial Opinions, Adverse Impact of a Plaintiff's Verdict, Informed Consent Form, Dr. Kang Social Media Posts, Personal Traits of Employees and Witnesses for Booker Bellwether case 02/22/2018 10235 Order re Parties' Joint Stipulation re prohibiting raising certain issues in the presence of the jury for Booker Bellwether case 03/01/2018 10258 Order re Motions in Limine re Recovery® Filter Complications, Recovery® Filter Development, FDA Warning Letter, IVC Filter as Lifesaving Devices, IVC filters are Gold Standard, Nonparties at Fault, Statements from Associations and Other Groups, FDA Consent for Warnings or Recalls for Booker Bellwether case 03/09/2018 10382 Order re Plaintiff's use of the depositions of Drs. Moritz, Rogers, and Stein at trial 7 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC MOTIONS IN LIMINE ORDERS Date Filed Doc. No. Docket Text 03/19/2018 10489 Order re Simon Nitinol Filter complication evidence 04/18/2018 10819 Order re reconsideration motions relating to Recovery® Filter Evidence and cephalad Migration Deaths for Jones Bellwether case 04/27/2018 10920 Order re Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of Court Order excluding evidence of Recovery® Filter Cephalad Migration Deaths for Jones Bellwether case 05/03/2018 10947 Order re Motions in Limine re (1) Case Specific Medical Issues (2) Relatives receipt of IVC Filters, (3) Experts Retained In Other Litigation, (4) Attorney Advertising, (5) Other Lawsuits for Jones Bellwether case 05/08/2018 11041 Order re cephalad migration deaths for Jones Bellwether case 05/15/2018 11082 Order re reconsideration of Recovery migration deaths 05/29/2018 11256 Order re cephalad migration, Recovery filter and deaths and FDA evidence for Jones Bellwether case 09/04/2018 12507 Order re SIR Guidelines and IFU for Hyde Bellwether case 09/07/2018 12533 Order re cephalad migration deaths, SNF as reasonable alternative design, personal opinions of Dr. Muehrcke, informed consent, FDA evidence, Surgeon General’s Call to Action, and falling accidents for Hyde Bellwether case 04/23/2019 17285 Order re medical care as an intervening cause of injury for Tinlin Bellwether case 04/26/2019 17401 Order re Ms. Tinlin’s IVC Size, unrelated medical conditions, rates of filter complications, retrievable filter sales versus SNF sales, social security benefits, cephalad migration deaths, FDA warning letter, crisis communications plan, and patient at Dr. Muehrcke’s hospital for Tinlin Bellwether case 8 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC DEPOSITION DESIGNATION ORDERS Date Filed Doc. No. Docket Text 03/07/2018 10348 Order re deposition designations for Booker Bellwether case 03/12/2018 10403 Order re deposition designations for Booker Bellwether case 03/14/2018 10438 Order re deposition designations for Booker Bellwether case 03/19/2018 10486 Order re deposition designations for Booker Bellwether case 03/21/2018 10497 Order re deposition designations for Booker Bellwether case 03/26/2018 10524 Order re deposition designations for Booker Bellwether case 05/01/2018 10922 Order re deposition designations for Jones Bellwether case 05/10/2018 11064 Order re deposition designations for Jones Bellwether case 05/11/2018 11073 Order re deposition designations for Jones Bellwether case 05/14/2018 11080 Order re deposition designations for Jones Bellwether case 05/31/2018 11313 Order re deposition designations for Jones Bellwether case 08/27/2018 12357 Order re deposition designations for Hyde Bellwether case 09/04/2018 12508 Order re deposition designations for Hyde Bellwether case 09/12/2018 12590 Order re deposition designations for Hyde Bellwether case 09/13/2018 12595 Order re deposition designations for Hyde Bellwether case 09/17/2018 12598 Order re deposition designations for Hyde Bellwether case 04/26/2019 17386 Order re deposition designations for Tinlin Bellwether case 05/03/2019 17513 Order re deposition designations for Tinlin Bellwether case 05/07/2019 17582 Order re deposition designations for Tinlin Bellwether case MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS Date Filed Doc. No. Docket Text 11/10/2015 269 Amended Stipulated Protective Order re Confidentiality 11/22/2017 8872 Order re Bard’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Preemption Grounds 9 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS Date Filed Doc. No. Docket Text 11/22/2017 8874 Order re Bard’s Motion for Summary Judgment for Booker Bellwether case 03/12/2018 10404 Order re Bard’s Motion for Summary Judgment for Jones Bellwether case 03/30/2018 10587 Order re final trial preparation and setting Final Pretrial Conference for Jones Bellwether case. 06/01/2018 11321 Order re final trial preparation and setting Final Pretrial Conference for Mulkey Bellwether case. 06/28/2018 11659 Order re final trial preparation and setting Final Pretrial Conference for Kruse Bellwether case. 07/13/2018 11871 Order re final trial preparation and setting Final Pretrial Conference for Hyde Bellwether case. 07/26/2018 12007 Order re Bard’s Motion for Summary Judgment for Hyde Bellwether case 08/02/2018 12061 Order re final trial preparation for Tinlin Bellwether case. 08/17/2018 12202 Order re Bard’s Motion for Summary Judgment for Kruse Bellwether case 09/12/2018 12589 Order re Preemption of Negligence Per Se for Hyde Bellwether case 09/13/2018 12593 Order re reconsideration of Order denying Wisconsin Government Rules Rebuttable Presumption of Non-Defect for Hyde Bellwether case 10/05/2018 12853 Order re amended schedule for final trial preparation and setting Final Pretrial Conference for Mulkey and Tinlin Bellwether cases. 10/16/2018 12971 Order re amended schedule for final trial preparation and setting Final Pretrial Conference for Tinlin Bellwether case. 04/16/2019 17008 Order re Bard’s Motion for Summary Judgment for Tinlin Bellwether case 05/31/2019 18038 Order re Plaintiffs Steering Committee’s Motion to Modify CMO 6 to Increase the Common Benefit Assessments 10 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC MASTER AND SHORT-FORM PLEADINGS Date Filed Doc. No. Docket Text 10/30/2015 249 CMO 2 re Setting Deadlines, First Phase of Discovery 12/17/2015 363 CMO 4 re Master Complaint, Responsive Pleadings, Short Form Complaint, Waiver, and Answer 3/17/2016 1108 Amended CMO 4 re Master Complaint, Responsive Pleadings, Short Form Complaint, Waiver, and Answer 4/20/2016 1485 Second Amended CMO 4 re Master Complaint, Responsive Pleadings, Short Form Complaint, Waiver, and Answer 12/17/2015 364 Master Complaint for Damages for Individual Claims 11/30/2015 302 Master Short Form Complaint for Damages for Individual Claims 12/17/2015 366 Defendants’ Answer to Plaintiffs’ Master Complaint 12/17/2015 365 CMO 5 re Plaintiff and Defendant Profile Forms 03/03/2016 927 Amended CMO 5 re Plaintiff and Defendant Profile Forms 03/18/2016 1153-1 Plaintiff Fact Sheet 03/18/2016 1153-2 Defendant Fact Sheet 11 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 79 2/19/2004 Characterization of RNF - Migration resistance; TPR-04-02-02 REV 0 Test protocol for migration resistance Characterization of RNF - Migration resistance 354 9/19/2006 PPT re G2; Caudal Movement causes tilting which leads to perforation PPT last modified 3/16/2009 (custodian Mike Randall) 443 11/30/2008 G2 and G2X Fracture Analysis Reporting date range 7/1/2005 thru 11/30/2008 447 4/1/2009 Filter - Fracture Analysis (June 2010) 495 3/26/2015 Recovery Filter System; Recovery Filter Overview 504 Eclipse Concept POA 545 Altonaga Deposition, 10/22/2013, Exhibit 03 - 2/26-2/27/2004 E-mail exchange b/w Hudnall and David Rauch of BPV Re. "Case for Caval Centering" 546 Altonaga Deposition, 10/22/2013, Exhibit 04, Lehmann Deposition 4/2/13, Ex. 14 and Ferarra, Ex. 7, Barry Deposition, 01/31/2014, Exhibit 18 - 4/13-4/15/2004 E-mail exchange b/w Lee Lynch, Lehmann, and others Re. "Crisis Plan and Supporting Documents for Your Review" 552 Asch 202, 5/18/1999 Letter from Thomas Kinst, Product Manager of Filters at NMT Medical, to Monica Coutanche, Marketing Manager at Bard Canada, Inc. 553 Asch Deposition, 05/02/2016 - Exhibit 203 - 9/14/2002 Memo from Thomas Kinst to Recovery Filter Design History File Re. Recovery Filter Compassionate Use, Subject: "Conference call with Bard Peripheral Technologies regarding clinical assessment of Recovery Filter removal #5" 556 Asch Deposition, 05/02/2016 - Exhibit 207 - 1/26/2001 Letter from Mount Sinai Hospital to Dr. Asch Re. "Assessment of a New Temporary/Removable IVC Filter" - and - 11/8/2001 Letter from Mount Sinai Research Ethics Board Re. "MSH Reference #01-0161-U 557 Asch Ex. 208, BPV-17-01-00056765 -766, /28/2000 E-mail from Paul Stagg to Cavagnaro, Mellen, Uelmen, Vierling, and Field Re. "Fwd [2]: compassionate IVC filters" (from Asch) 559 Asch Exh. 210, BPV-17-01-00052621, 4/17/2002- Email from George Cavagnaro to Doug Uelmen and Carol Vierling, dated April 18, 2002 1 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 561 Asch Deposition, 05/02/2016 - Exhibit 212 - Special 510(k) Submission for the Recovery Filter System, K022236, dated 11/27/2002 563 Asch Deposition, 05/02/2016 - Exhibit 218 - Information for Use - Recovery Filter System, Dated 2004 567 Asch Deposition, 05/02/2016 - Exhibit 223 - 3/10/2003 Letter from Dr. Asch Re support for RF 571 Baird Deposition, 06/09/2016 - Exhibit 301 - PowerPoint Presentation entitled BPV Filter Franchise Review dated 5/6/2008 (colored and 43 pages) 587 Baird Deposition, 06/09/2016 - Exhibit 318 - Aug. 2010 Article by Nicholson et al. entitled "Online First: Prevalence of Fracture and Fragment Embolization of Bard Retrievable Vena Cava Filters and Clinical Implications Including Cardiac Perforation and Tamponade" 588 Baird Deposition, 06/09/2016 - Exhibit 319 - 11/12/2009 E-mail from Bret Baird to Bill Little, John Van Vleet, and Gin Schulz, with others CC’ed, Re. "Bard Filter Fractures presentation online" 589 Baird Deposition, 06/09/2016 - Exhibit 320 - ABA Project Agreement with BPV, Inc., dated 11/9/2010 590 Baird Deposition, 06/09/2016 - Exhibit 321 - 11/29-12/1/2010 E-mail exchange b/w Bret Baird and Jimmy Balwit Re. "White Paper, Proof 2" 591 Baird Deposition, 06/09/2016 - Exhibit 322 - Bard Idea POA on the Denali Filter, Project No. 8108 Rev. 0.0, revised August 2009 by Bret Baird 592 Baird Deposition, 06/09/2016 - Exhibit 325 - 4/28/2010 E-mail from Bret Baird to the Sales Team 614 Betensky 02/2017 Expert Report - Adverse event reports and monthly sales totals through May 2011 631 Betensky Expert Report - DFMEA070044, Rev. 3: G2 Express - Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis 635 Betensky Expert Report - DFMEA070077, Rev. 1: Eclipse (Vail) Filter System - Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis 677 SOF Filter Fracture Analysis, August 2010, Reporting range 7/1/05 - 8/31/10, G2, G2X, and Eclipse 691 Boyle, 02/02/2017, Exhibit 842 - E-mail chain first one from John Van Vleet to Steve Williamson, dated 11/5/2015, 6 pages 2 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 696 Brauer Deposition, 05/23/2014 - Exhibit 16 - Testimony of Marcia Crosse, Director of Health Care, before the Subcommittee on Health, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives Re. "Medical Devices ¬Shortcomings in FDA's Premarket Review, Postmarket Surveillance, and Inspections of Device Manufacturing Establishments", dated 6/18/2009 709 Brauer, 08/02/2017, Exhibit 1046 - Bard Simon Nitinol Filter, Postmarket Surveillance Study Amendment, August 10, 2014 730 Carr Deposition, 04/17/2013 - Exhibit 01 - Class of Plaintiffs' Notice of Taking Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Duces Tecum in Case No. 12-80951- CIV-ROSENBAUM 735 Carr Deposition, 04/17/2013 - Exhibit 07 - Bard Idea POA - Eclipse Anchor Filter, caudal migration, Rev 0, 4/1/2010 E-mail exchange b/w Tracy Estrada and Ed Fitzpatrick 737 Carr Deposition, 04/17/2013 - Exhibit 09 - 8/22-8/25/2008 E-mail exchange b/w Bret Bard, Mike Randall, and Natalie Wong Re. "[Redacted] Conference call - complaint on fracture" 755 Carr Deposition, 10/29/2014 - Exhibit 3A - E-mail exchange b/w Hudnall and others from 3/9-10/4/2005 Re. "Special Accounts Roadshow" 764 REDACTED Carr Deposition, 11/05/2013 - Exhibit 14 - 5/27/2004 E-mail b/w Greer, Carr, Hudnall, and Sullivan re. "Bariatric patients and filters", "Stay out of the buffet line", BPVE-01-00010858 -859 769 Carr Deposition, 12/19/2013 - Exhibit 05 - BPV Meridian Claims Matrix, dated 7/2/2010 770 Carr Deposition, 12/19/2013 - Exhibit 06 - Bard's Denali Concept Product Opportunity Appraisal, POA-8108, Rev. 1.0 800 Carr Deposition, 12/19/2014 - Exhibit 18 - NMT RNF PDT Meeting Notes re Product Development Team, 01/13/1998 802 Carr Deposition, 12/19/2014 - Exhibit 20 - NMT R&D Technical Report, RD-RPT-128, 09/01/2000, Investigation Report of a Migrated Recovery Filter in the Human Use Experience at Mt. Sinai Hospital 854 REDACTED Carr Deposition, November 5, 2013 - Exhibit 15 - 12/12/2004 E-mail from Uelmen to Kellee Jones, attaching 12/9/2004 Remedial Action Plan (Revised) SPA-04-12-01 3 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 876 Chanduszko Deposition, 04/23/2015 - Exhibit 17 - Pages 30-44 of Notebook No. 7013, Project: Recovery Filter Arm Fatigue Testing 905 Ferrara Exh. 19, BPVE-01-00245186 -188, Email chain re G2 Caudal Migrations 12/27/2005 922 Ciavarella Deposition, 11/12/2013 - Exhibit 22 - Chart of Sales and Adverse Events for all competitors from Q3/00 through Q2/03, according to the MAUDE database. 923 Ciavarella Deposition, 11/12/2013 - Exhibit 24 - Summary of Sales and Adverse Events for all competitors from 01/00 through Q1/04 924 Ciavarella Deposition, 11/12/2013 - Exhibit 26 - Chart of Sales and Adverse Events for all competitors from 01/00 through Q1 2006, according to the MAUDE database. 925 Ciavarella Deposition, 11/12/2013 - Exhibit 28 - PowerPoint presentation entitled "Filters Complaint History Data as of 7/31/2007" by Natalie Wong. 926 REDACTED Ciavarella Deposition, 11/12/2013 - Exhibit 31 - 8/3/2005 Memo from C. Ganser to T. Ring/J. Weiland Re. IVC Recovery Filter Adverse Events (Migrations/Fractures) 927 Ciavarella Deposition, 11/12/2013 - Exhibit 35 - Health Hazard Evaluation Memo from Ciavarella to Uelmen Re. "Recovery Filter - Consultant's report", dated 12/17/2004 931 Ciavarella Deposition, 11/12/2013 - Exhibit 39 - Draft of Updated Health Hazard Evaluation Memo from Ciavarella to Uelmen, re: "Limb Fractures of Recovery Filter", dated 7/9/2004. 932 SWOT Analysis; 5/6/2008 PowerPoint presentation entitled "Filter Franchise Review" BPVE-01-00622862 - 900 945 Cohen Exh. 736, BPVE-01-00074004 - 006, IVC Filters - Covered Stents, Monthly Report April, 2004 965 Cohen Exh. 757, BPVEFILTER-01-00148562, E-mail dated 12/15/04, with attached FDA Filter Information, FDA called Temple to speak with Cohen 991 Cortelezzi, 11/11/2016, Exhibit 586 - 12/23/2005 E-mail from David Ciavarella Re. "G2 Caudal Migrations", forwarded to Brian Barry on 12/27. Worst case consequence of migrations - accompanied in a majority of tilt cases. Would like to now look at G2 complaints. 4 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 992 Cortelezzi, 11/11/2016, Exhibit 588 - 7/16/2005 E-mail from Jason Greer to many Re. "Westy's situation…everyone's situation", detailing Bard's need to respond to Cordis' bringing forward the Maude database to physicians and "causing a problem" 994 D'Ayala Exh. 4, G2 Filter System for Permanent Placement, IFU, G2 Filter System, 10/2006, Rev. 5, PK5100030, BPV-17-01-00137425 - 432 (also used with Muehrcke) 1001 D'Ayala Exh. 13, Evidence-Based Evaluation of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Complications Based on Filter Type 1006 DeCant Deposition, 05/24/2016 - Exhibit 254 - 12/9/2003 Meeting Minutes Memo from Brian Hudson to Len DeCant, Mike Casanova, Robert Carr, and Alex Tessmer Re. "Special Design Review for Recovery (Project #'s 7081 and 8008)" 1009 REDACTED DeCant Deposition, 05/24/2016 - Exhibit 258 - 4/6/2004 Memo from Peter Palermo to Doug Uelmen Re. "Remedial Action Plan - BPV Recovery Nitinol Vena Cava Filter", including the Remedial Action Plan SPA 04-03-01 on the Recovery Filter, dated 3/26/2004 1014 REDACTED DeCant Deposition, 05/24/2016 - Exhibit 264 - 6/11/2004 Memo from Pete Palermo to Doug Uelmen Re. "Remedial Action Plan - BPV Recovery Filter - Migration" 1018 REDACTED DeCant Deposition, 05/24/2016 - Exhibit 268 - 9/27/2004 Memo from Pete Palermo to Doug Uelmen Re. "Remedial Action Plan - BPV Recovery Filter - Migration (SPA-04-05-01)" 1022 REDACTED DeCant Deposition, 05/24/2016 - Exhibit 274 - Failure Investigation Report on the Recovery Filter Migration, FIR- 04-12-01 Rev. 00 1023 DeCant Deposition, 05/24/2016 - Exhibit 275 - Internal Presentation on the G2 Filter System for Permanent Use, detailing the design modifications, features/benefits, and comparison to the Recovery Filter 1031 REDACTED Deford Deposition, 06/02/2016 - Exhibit 283 - BPV File on The Recovery Filter Migration, including Minutes from the 2/12/2004 Migration Meeting 1036 Deford Deposition, 06/02/2016 - Exhibit 296 - 9/26-9/27/2007 High Importance E-mail exchange b/w Dennis Salzmann, John Van Vleet, and John Reviere of BPV, with others CC’ed, Re. "Comments on Rev H". Discussion about concern for over-reporting of the SIR guidelines re- classification and removal of the retroperitoneal bleed, and replacing consultant John Lehmann 5 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 1053 Edwards Deposition, 01/20/2014 - Exhibit 02 - 3/28/2003 Document RE. "Product Opportunity Appraisal for Recovery Filter", FM070018, Doc No. POA-7081, Version 000 1062 BPV PowerPoint presentation entitled "BPV/AngioMed New Product Development Review Meeting - April 26, 2004" 1130 Ferrara Exh. 3, Email Chain from Regina Busenbark to Robert Ferrara 1-12-2006 1133 Ferrera Deposition, 04/07/2017, Exhibit 11 - Recovery Filter Arm Fracture, Remedial Action Plan September 2, 2004 1140 REDACTED Ferrera Deposition, 04/07/2017, Exhibit 25 - Presentation titled Filter-Fracture Analysis 1149 Fuller Deposition, 01/11/2016 - Exhibit 123 - NMT Report Entitled "Line Extension to the Simon Nitinol Filter®/Straight Line System, To Be Referred As: TRADEMARK Retrievable Filter" 1211 Ganser Deposition, 10/11/2016 - Exhibit 516 - 21 U.S.C.A. § 351, Adultered Drugs and Devices, Effective 7/9/2012 1214 REDACTED Ganser Deposition, 10/11/2016 - Exhibit 523 - Several memos: (1) 12/8/2004 BPV Memo from John McDermott to Tim Ring and John Weiland Re. "Monthly Global PV Report - November 2004"; (2) 12/8/2005 BPV Memo from John McDermott to Tim Ring and John Weiland Re. "Monthly Global PV Report - November 2005; (3) 2/10/2006 BPV Memo from John McDermott to Tim Ring and John Weiland Re. "Monthly Global PV Report - January 2006; and (4) 2/8/2007 BPV Memo from John McDermott to Tim Ring and John Weiland Re. "Monthly Global PV Report - January 2007 1216 Ganser Deposition, 10/11/2016 - Exhibit 526 - Regulatory Affairs Manual Re. "Product Remedial Actions", RA- STD-002 Rev. 08, dated 10/12/2000 1219 REDACTED Ganser Deposition, 10/11/2016 - Exhibit 529 - 6/30/2004 Updated Health Hazard Evaluation from David Ciavarella, M.D. to Doug Uelmen Re. "Migration of Recovery Filter" 1220 REDACTED Ganser Deposition, 10/11/2016 - Exhibit 530 - 8/25/2004 E-mail from Avijit Mukherjee to Robert Carr, Janet Hudnall CC’ed, Re. "Recovery Filter objective statement", proposing one objective statement for the Recovery Filter G1A project, which Hudnall thought sounded "great" 1221 REDACTED Ganser Deposition, 10/11/2016 - Exhibit 533 - 2/15/2006 Health Hazard Evaluation from David Ciavarella to Gin Schulz Re. "G2 Inferior Vena Cava Filter - Migration" 6 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 1222 REDACTED Ganser Deposition, 10/11/2016 - Exhibit 534 - PowerPoint Presentation for a meeting to analyze EVEREST and MAUDE data and provide justifications for proposed changes to G2 filter 1295 Graves Deposition, 02/27/2014 - Exhibit 10 - 3/23/2006 E-mail exchange b/w Mickey Graves and Charlie Simpson, FEA on G2, regarding Historical FEA analysis 1335 Hudnall Deposition, 11/01/2013, Exhibit 21 - Brochure - Recovery Cone Removal System 1336 Hudnall Deposition, 11/01/2013, Exhibit 22 - Recovery G2 Filter System brochure 1337 Hudnall Deposition, 11/01/2013, Exhibit 23 - G2 Brochure (permanent) - Patient Questions & Answers and Bard's website page about G2 Filter System, Indicated for removal, 6/10/2010 1339 REDACTED Hudnall Deposition, 11/01/2013, Exhibit 29 - 7/6/2004 E-mail exchange b/w Hudnall and Bob Cortelezzi Re. "Maude Website Discussion" 1369 Hudson Deposition, 01/17/2014 - Exhibit 16 - 3/24/2004 E-mail from Alex Tessmer to Charlie Benware and Ed Fitzpatrick Re. "Starguide Filter Migration Test Results" 1370 Hudson Deposition, 01/17/2014 - Exhibit 18 - 12/11/2003 E-mail exchange b/w Brian Hudson and Janet Hudnall, others CC’ed, Re. "Special Design Review for Recovery - Meeting Minutes". 1383 Hudson Deposition, 01/17/2014, Exhibit 13 - BPV Engineering Test Report - Characterization of Recovery Filter Migration Resistance in Comparison to Competitive Product - Phase 1, ETR-04-03-02, Rev 0. 1500 Kessler Report - August 7, 2010, John Van Vleet emailed BPV President Jim Beasley, Marketing Director Bill Little, and V.P. of QA Gin Schulz 1517 EVEREST Track wise and MAUDE PowerPoint, BPV-17-01-00188507 1568 Kessler Report - September 30, 2010 memo from Brett Baird to Eclipse DRT, with the subject line “Eclipse Post- Market Design Review/Marketing Summary,” stated: “The objective of the Eclipse Filter project was to enhance the G2 X filter surface finish…" 1578 ETR-06-28-29, revision 0, project #8049, Caudal Migration Test Method Development and G2 Filter Resistance Test Report, 11/27/06, BPVE-01-00789532 7 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 1580 REDACTED Kessler Report -July 12, 2004 email from Bard’s VP of Regulatory Sciences Chris Ganser, to Tim Ring and John Weiland, attached “an executive summary of Recovery Filter adverse events (migration and fracture” 1594 REDACTED Lehmann Deposition, 04/02/2013 - Exhibit 08 - 2/16/2005 E-mail from Charlie Simpson to Hudnall Re. "American Venous Forum - Mary Protocor presented an evaluation of filter related findings from the Maude database" 1612 Lehmann Deposition, 08/07/2014, Exhibit 08 - Updated Health Hazard Evaluation Memo from Ciavarella to Uelmen, re: "Limb Fractures of Recovery Filter", dated 7/9/2004 1613 Lehmann Deposition, 08/07/2014, Exhibit 09 - 6/10/2004 E-mail exchange b/w Ciavarella and Cindi Walcott Re. "Recovery Filter/Detachments" 1616 Little Deposition, 06/27/2016 - Exhibit 2003 - "Patient Questions & Answers" Brochure for the G2 Filter System 1617 Little Deposition, 06/27/2016 - Exhibit 2004 - Chart entitled "EVEREST/Cook Celect Clinical Comparison" 1618 Little Deposition, 06/27/2016 - Exhibit 2005 - 4/27/2010 BPV Memo from Filter Marketing to Bill Little Re. "Filter naming", detailing the name rational for the Eclipse and Denali 1621 Little Deposition, 06/27/2016 - Exhibit 2009 - "Fractures of a Nitinol IVC Filter" presentation by Dr. W. Jay Nicholson on www.CRTonline.org, in which he reviewed a single center experience on fractures with the Bard Recovery and G2 filters 1643 McDermott Deposition, 02/05/2014 - Exhibit 02 - Bard's Product Performance Specification Report on the Recovery Filter and Femoral Delivery System, PPS No. PPS070016 Rev. 0 1680 REDACTED McDonald Deposition, 07/29/2016 - Exhibit 21 - 7/13/2015 Warning Letter from the FDA regarding the 11/25/2014 Inspection of the C.R. Bard facility in NY and the 11/18/2014-1/5/2015 Inspection of the BPV facility in AZ 1740 Modra Deposition, 06/06/2014 - Exhibit 5 - 1/18/2010 E-mail from Bret Baird (Marketing Manager of IVC Filters) to Sales Team list serve (TPE-PV Sales-DG) Re. "Important: Eclipse Vena Cava Filter Launch Details" 1742 Modra Deposition, 06/06/2014 - Exhibit 7 - Product Opportunity Appraisal for the G2 Platinum Concept, POA-8088 Rev. 1.0, Revised on 5/5/2009 1763 Modra, 01/26/2017, Exhibit 771A - Chart entitled "Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis" on the Simon Nitinol Filter - SNF/SL Filter Sets (DFMEA070042 Rev. 1) 8 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 1787 Orms Deposition, 08/16/2016 - Exhibit 13 - 11/9/2010 E-mail Thread from Chris Smith Re. "Northside(S) Filter Business" 1788 Orms Deposition, 08/16/2016 - Exhibit 14 - 10/2/2010 E-mail Thread from Jeffrey Pellicio Re. "Meridian Commercialization Plan" 1817 Raji-Kubba Deposition, 07/18/2016 - Exhibit 301 - 5/14/2009 E-mail from Bill Edwards to Raji-Kubba and Mike Randall Re. "Tomorrow" 1821 Raji-Kubba Deposition, 07/18/2016 - Exhibit 305 - 11/12/2009 E-mail from Bret Baird to Bill Little, John Van Vleet, and Gin Schulz 1822 Raji-Kubba Deposition, 07/18/2016 - Exhibit 307 - 1/21/2010 Bard Memo from Jeffrey Pellicio to "Reviewers" 1823 Raji-Kubba Deposition, 07/18/2016 - Exhibit 308 - 1/4/2010 E-mail from Gin Schulz to Beasley, Raji-Kubba, Van Vleet, Doherty, and Little Re. "Potential Actions" 1825 Raji-Kubba Deposition, 07/18/2016 - Exhibit 310 - 9/1/2009 E-mail from Mike Randall Re. "0809 Filters Monthly Report.doc" 1861 Only admitted Randall, 01/18/2017, Exhibit 634 - Binder labeled "Meridian Design History File DHF, Vol. II" Pgs. 38 & 70 1912 Romney Deposition, 09/07/2016 - Exhibit 2039 3/16/2006 E-mail from Jason Greer to Janet Hudnall 1926 Romney, 01/18/2017, Exhibit 2061 - 8/6/2014 E-mail from Schyler Smith, Field Manager for BPV in Washington- Idaho-Montana, to Kim Romney, Subject redacted, relaying that a redacted doctor had placed a Meridian in the past year and discovered at retrieval that an arm fractured, which imaging confirmed had occurred within 1 week of placement, and was now wondering if he should try to remove the filter or leave it in. Van Vleet forwarded to Treratola in a high importance e-mail on 8/7, requesting that he contact the doctor on Bard's behalf. 1940 REDACTED Schulz Deposition, 01/30/2014 - Exhibit 11 - Chart of Adverse Events and Deaths for all competitors from Prior Evaluation through Q3 2005 and from 1941 REDACTED Schulz Deposition, 01/30/2014 - Exhibit 12 - 11/30/2005 E-mail exchange b/w Gin Schulz and Kellee Jones re Gin, G2 v. Maude and attachments, Spread Sheet - Filter Sales (IMS Q1 '00 to Q4 '04, + Trend Q1 - Q3 '05) 9 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 1944 Schulz Deposition, 01/30/2014 - Exhibit 15 - 5/19/2006 E-mail from Natalie Wong to Gin Schulz and Candi Long, attaching the PowerPoint Presentation on "Recovery (Gen 1) Fracture Slides" (included in exhibit) and RNF Fracture Report (not included), updated to be current as of 5/18/2006 for the Management Review 1945 Schulz Exh. 16, BPVEFILTER-01-00008798 - 851, 10/1/2006 E-mail from Natalie Wong to Several Re. "Fracture Docs" 1946 Schulz Deposition, 01/30/2014 - Exhibit 17 - 2/2/2006 E-mail from Gin Schulz to Several Re. "Minutes" 1947 Schulz Deposition, 01/30/2014 - Exhibit 19 - 5/10/2006 E-mail from Natalie Wong Re. "FDA Proposed Response" 1948 Schulz Deposition, 01/30/2014 - Exhibit 2 - 1/31/2006 E-mail from Gin Schulz to Mickey Graves and Natalie Wong Re. "Caudal" 1949 Schulz Deposition, 01/30/2014 - Exhibit 21 - 6/28/2011 Email Chain from Brian Hudson to Kevin Bovee and Chad Modra Re Talking Points Including attachment 1950 Schulz Deposition, 01/30/2014 - Exhibit 4 - Meeting Summary of the IVC Filter Focus Group meeting held on 6/1/2006 in Chicago, IL at Hilton O'Hare 1951 Schulz Deposition, 01/30/2014 - Exhibit 5 - 1/31/2005 Memo from Peter Palermo to Kerry Chunko Re. "Quality Plan 2005" 2045 Sullivan Deposition, 09/16/2016 - Exhibit 431 - Marketing Brochure - G2 Filter System for Permanent Placement 2048 REDACTED Sullivan Deposition, 09/16/2016 - Exhibit 437 - Document entitled "Failure Investigations/R002 History Review" 2049 Sullivan Deposition, 09/16/2016 - Exhibit 439 - 11/17/2004 Updated Health Hazard Evaluation Memo from David Ciavarella, M.D. to Doug Uelmen, Re: "Limb Fractures of Recovery Filter" 2052 Wong Exh. 546, BPVE-01-01239757 - 775, Draft of PowerPoint Presentation entitled "G2 and G2X Fracture Analysis", dated 11/30/2008 2057 REDACTED Sullivan, 11/03/2016, Exhibit 442 - Recovery Filter Migration Remedial Action Plan SPA-04-12-01 dated 1/4/2005, including the Lehmann Report and Dr. Ciavarella's 12/17/2004 HHE titled "Recovery Filter - Consultant's report" 2059 Tessmer Deposition, 06/12/2013 - Exhibit 02 - Project Status Report Form for the Recovery Filter, Project No. 7081, initiated 7/1/2002 with the goal to "Investigate Migration"; FM0700160, Rev. 1 10 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 2061 Tessmer 5, BPVE-01-00000230, 2/4/2004 E-mail from Alex Tessmer to Several Re. "Updated: Filter Migration Flow Loop Test Fixture" 2062 Tessmer Deposition, 06/12/2013 - Exhibit 07 - 1/14/2004 Memo from Rob Carr to File Re. "Design Review Meeting Minutes Response" 2063 Tessmer Deposition, 06/12/2013 - Exhibit 08 - 2/25/2004 E-mail from Alex Tessmer to Robert Carr and Brian Hudson Re. "Filter Migration Test Results 2065 Tessmer Deposition, 06/12/2013 - Exhibit 11 - BPV Engineering Test Report - Characterization of Recovery Filter Migration Resistance When Legs are Crossed or Hooks Removed - Phase 2, ETR-04-03-10, Rev 0 2068 Tessmer Deposition, 06/12/2013 - Exhibit 17 - 6/8/2004 "High" Importance E-mail from Alex Tessmer to Carr, Chanduszko, and Hudson Re. "Filter Improvement DOE" 2069 Tessmer Deposition, 06/12/2013 - Exhibit 19 - 8/26/2004 E-mail from Alex Tessmer to Robert Carr and Avijit Mukherjee Re. "Corporate Presentations" 2090 Tillman, 08/04/2017, Exhibit 1064 - NMT PowerPoint, Cprdos, 06/14/2000 2105 Trerotola, 01/20/2017, Exhibit 692 - 4/30/2015 E-mail from Dr. Trerotola to John Van Vleet, forwarding an article from Forbes Magazine about ALN filters entitled "Effect of a Retrievable IVC Filter Plus Anticoagulation vs. Anticoagulation Alone on Risk of Recurrent PE: A Randomized Clinic Trial". Per Trerotola, "not good for ALN...and maybe not good for the industry". The article was discussed through 5/4, as they were meeting that day to review articles before meeting with JVV. 2149 Vierling Deposition, 05/11/2016 - Exhibit 231 - 12/13/2001 E-mail from Carol Vierling to kaufmajo@ohsu.edu, Paul Stagg, and Connie Murray Re. "RF Protocol" 2153 Vierling Deposition, 05/11/2016 - Exhibit 236 - 6/3/2002 Memo from Lynn Buchanan-Kopp to Project 7081 Design History File Recovery Filter Project Team Re. "Project Phase Clarification", defining the 3 phases of the Recovery filter project (I. Permanent; II. Intraprocedural Removal; and III. Long-Term Removable), as decided at the project team meeting on 5/20/2002 2217 Williamson Deposition, 09/07/2016 - Exhibit 105 - Cover page entitled "Attachment 1.14", followed by the 1/23/2015 Memo from Ludwig to Chad Modra Re. "IVC Filters Retrospective Review", detailing the 2-year review 11 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. of 939 filter complaints from 1/2013 to 1/2015, with a chart detailing whether the MDR classification changed for any complaints 2238 Wilson, 01/31/2017, Exhibit 801 - E-mail string, Subject: Meridian Commercialization Plan 2243 Wong Deposition, 10/18/2016 - Exhibit 537 - 4/23/2004 E-mail from John Lehmann to Carr and Uelmen Re. "Draft data set for statistician" 2244 REDACTED Wong Deposition, 10/18/2016 - Exhibit 538 - 12/17/2004 Health Hazard Evaluation from David Ciavarella to Doug Uelmen Re. "Recovery Filter - Consultant's Report", detailing the 76 reports of the Recovery filter, with 32 serious injury and 10 deaths of the 20,827 units sold during the reporting period 2245 Wong Exh. 540, Recovery Gen 1, Fracture and Migration Complaint Update, 6-20-2006 2245 Wong Deposition, 10/18/2016 - Exhibit 540 - Confidential PowerPoint Presentation entitled "Recovery (Gen 1) - Fracture and Migration Complaint Update," dated 6/20/2006 2246 Wong Exh. 541, BPVE-01-01512188, Email from Natalie Wong to Gin Schulz Re RNF Fracture Report 8-1-06, 8-4- 2006 2247 Wong Deposition, 10/18/2016 - Exhibit 542 - 12/2/2009 E-mail exchange b/w Sandy Kerns and Natalie Wong Re. "Filter Fractures" 2248 Wong Deposition, 10/18/2016 - Exhibit 543 - PAT PowerPoint Presentation entitled "G2 Caudal Migration Update," dated 3/2/2006, which Wong circulated via e-mail on 3/2/2006 to several for the presentation that afternoon 2249 Wong Deposition, 10/18/2016 - Exhibit 544 - 5/18/2006 Natalie Wong meeting documents, email re "Caudal Investigation" with attachments of G2 Caudal Report 05.18.06 and Caudal Pre-PAT minutes 2250 Wong Deposition, 10/18/2016 - Exhibit 545 - BPV's Failure Investigation Report on the G2 Filter - Caudal Migration, FIR-06-01-01, unsigned and forwarded by Wong to Gin Schulz for her review, in anticipation of the Friday deadline 2251 Wong Deposition, 10/18/2016 - Exhibit 547 - 4/10/2006 High Importance E-mail from Cindi Walcott to Allen, Schulz, and McDermott Re. "FW: FDA Request for Information" 2252 Wong Deposition, 10/18/2016 - Exhibit 548 - 9/25/2007 E-mail from John Lehmann to John Van Vleet and John Reviere Re. "EVEREST FSR rev H and supporting redlines 12 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 2253 Wong Deposition, 10/18/2016 - Exhibit 549 - 5/27/2004 E-mail from Natalie Wong to Doug Uelmen Re. "Recovery Stats" 2254 Wong Deposition, 10/18/2016 - Exhibit 552 - 2/17/2006 Memo from Mickey Graves and Natalie Wong Re. "Recovery Filter (Generation 1) Product Assessment Team Minutes - Fractures" 3262 REDACTED Complaint File - 03/09/2010, 263280, G2 - RF310F, 2907 Detachment of device or device component 3270 REDACTED Complaint File - 03/30/2010, 266286, G2 - RF310F, 2907 Detachment of device or device component 3304 REDACTED Complaint File - 07/28/2010, 282326, Eclipse - EC500J, 2907 Detachment of device or device component; 2907M Filter Limb(s) 3572 Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K for C.R. Bard, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31st, 2016 3573 Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-Q for C.R. Bard, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30th, 2017 4327 REDACTED 2/10/06 monthly meeting - redesign due to caudal migration (excludes last 4 pages) 4328 Ganser Exh. 517 Device Labeling Guidance, General Program Memorandum 4330 Asch Deposition, 05/02/2016 - Exhibit 206, July 21, 1999 letter to Dr. Freeland from Dr. Asch 4332 Updated CV of Murray Asch 4392 Truthfulness and Accuracy Statement Vierling Deposition, Exhibit 227 4409 G2 Brochure 2 4412 Email from: Gin Schulz to Kevin Shiffrin regarding Recovery Filter Limb Fractures with attachment of RF Limb detach 4414 Email from Brian Reinkensmeyer to Baird cc Pellicio and Randall re "Filter study Idea" 4415 Email from Mike Randall to Carr and Raji-Kubba re "Misclassified??" 4416 Bill Little email re Eclipse Filter Naming 4420 REDACTED Meridian Vena Cava Filter and Jugular Delivery System Product Performance Specification PPS, Revision 3 13 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 4428 Eclipse Vena Cava Filter Ad 4430 Eclipse Vena Cava Filter Brochure 4433 Eclipse Vena Cava Filter Patient Questions & Answers 4438 G2 Express Vena Cava Filter Brochure 4454 Eclipse Vena Cava Filter Concept POA, Revision 2 4455 Vail Vena Cava Filter DIS 4456 Eclipse Vena Cava Filter Product Performance Specification (PPS) 4457 Vail Filter System DFMEA 4459 Eclipse Vena Cava Filter Jugular Vein Approach IFU 4467 8/12/2011 email from Mike Randall to Joni Creal re Corp approval needed for Cleveland Clinic Studies w/ attached PowerPoint slides re Filter Fixation and Migration: Forces and Design 4468 6/10/2011 email from Mike Randall re Meridian Presentation for SSM 2011 4469 Data Source Evaluation memo from Natalie Wong to Quality Systems Coordinator, October 2010 4486 G2 Express Project Plan FM0700150 Rev 6 1-30-07 4499 Meridian Vena Cava Filter vs. Eclipse Vena Cava Filter 4504 REDACTED Monthly Management Report, dated 4/8/09 4507 REDACTED Monthly Management Report, dated 7/9/09 4509 REDACTED Monthly Management Report, dated 10/8/09 4512 REDACTED Monthly Management Report, dated 1/1/10 4514 REDACTED Monthly Management Report, dated 3/8/10 4515 Only admitted Monthly Management Report, dated 4/8/10 pgs. 12 & 13 14 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 4519 REDACTED Monthly Management Report, dated 8/9/10 4522 REDACTED Monthly Management Report, dated 11/8/10 4528 REDACTED Monthly Management Report, dated 5/9/11 4532 REDACTED Monthly Management Report, dated 9/9/11 4533 REDACTED Monthly Management Report, dated 10/10/11 4534 REDACTED Monthly Management Report, dated 11/8/11 4552 Decant Deposition Exhibit 273, Failure Investigation Report, Recovery Filter Migration FIR-04-12-02, Rev. 00 4554 NMT Medical, BSC Presentation, 5/22/2000 4565 FRE 1006 Chart - Plaintiff's Compilation Complaint Record Detail 4595 Kandarpa Deposition, 07/19/2018 - Exhibit 05 - Medical Monitor Meeting Minutes, August 29, 2005, Beechwood Hotel, Worcester, MA, Version 1.0 (6 pages), signed 12/16/05. *only the last page is bates stamped BBA-00012962 4596 Kandarpa Deposition, 07/19/2018 - Exhibit 06 - Everest Clinical Trial, Medical Monitor Meeting agenda and power point, June 19, 2006, Revision B 4599 Kandarpa Deposition, 07/19/2018 - Exhibit 09 - Summary of Filter Movement, 5mm or greater, Final Clinical Summary Report EVEREST 4600 Kandarpa Deposition, 07/19/2018 - Exhibit 10 - Device Observation Table (as of 10/23/2006) 4601 Kandarpa Deposition, 07/19/2018 - Exhibit 11 - Listing of Device Observations, Final Clinical Summary Report EVEREST 4602 Kandarpa Deposition, 07/19/2018 - Exhibit 12 - Adjudication Manual of Operations, EVEREST (trial exhibit 5983 4603 Kandarpa Deposition, 07/19/2018 - Exhibit 13 - Recovery G2 Filter System - Femoral and Jugular/Subclavian Delivery Kits, Tradition 510(k), October 31, 2007 4604 Kandarpa Deposition, 07/19/2018 - Exhibit 14 - Article entitled "Technical Success and Safety of Retrieval of the G2 Filter in a Prospective, Multicenter Study", Nov. 2009 15 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 4607 Kandarpa Deposition, 07/19/2018 - Exhibit 17 - Memorandum dated June 21, 2006 Subject: G2 Caudal Migration Failure Investigation Team Agenda, From Natalie Wong 4617 VanVleet Deposition, 09/26/2016 - Exhibit 496 - Bard Recovery G2 EVEREST Final Study Report 4785 Fermanich Deposition, 3/17/17 - Exhibit 2: Email, from Tim Hug, 3/19/10, Re: Adversity-How are you going to respond (6 pages) 4786 Fermanich Deposition, 3/17/17 - Exhibit 3: Email, from Tim Hug, 4/27/10, Re: Flair-April Expected Results (3 pages) 4794 Fermanich Deposition, 3/17/17 - Exhibit 11: Email from Tim Hug to Hans Yentz (and others), 2/9/10, Subject: Filter Accounts-Eclipse Transition (2 pages) 4795 Fermanich Deposition, 3/17/17 - Exhibit 12: G2 Filter product brochure (4 pages) 4797 Fermanich Deposition, 3/17/17 - Exhibit 14: Email from Tim Hug to Nine Aghakhan (and others), 3/24/10, Subject: FW: G2 X not available for order (2 pages) 4798 Fermanich Deposition, 3/17/17 - Exhibit 15: Email from Bret Baird to TPW-PV Sales-DG, 4/28/10, Subject: When was the last time… (2 pages) 4800 Fermanich Deposition, 3/17/17 - Exhibit 17: Email from David Ciavarella to Brian Berry (and others), 12/27/05, Subject: FW: G2 Caudal Migrations (2 pages) 4804 Only admitted Fermanich Deposition, 3/17/17 - Exhibit 21: Email from Mary Christine Starr to Matt Fermanich, 2/17/11, Subject: 1st email, RE: Technician Registration (4 pages) redacted other emails 4806 Only admitted Fermanich Deposition, 3/17/17 - Exhibit 23: Email from Cynthia L. Haas to Matt Fermanich, 4/21/11, Subject: RE: pg. 2 Expired product (7 pages) 4809 Fermanich Deposition, 3/17/17 - Exhibit 26: Email from Tim Hug to Matt Fermanich, 12/13/00, Subject: G2 Filter Discontinued (2 pages) 16 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 4812 Fermanich Deposition, 3/17/17 - Exhibit 29: BPV Memo from Filter Marketing to Bill Little, 4/27/10, Subject: Filter naming (2 pages) 4820 Fermanich Deposition, 3/17/17 - Exhibit 37: Health Hazard Evaluation memo from David Ciavarella to Gin Schulz, 2/15/06, Re: G2 Inferior Vena Cava Filter - Migration (3 pages) 4842 Hug Deposition, 8/23/17 - Exhibit 1117: Email to Nine Aghakhan from Tim Hug, 3/8/11, Subject: FW: GW Fem Filter Backorder (2 pages) 4893 GX2 Risk Analysis 4894 Eclipse Risk Analysis 4895 Meridian Risk Analysis 4896 Caudal Migration Testing Meridian and Optease 4897 G2 Express Product Performance Specification, PPS-8058 4938 BPV Consulting Request Form 5001 Dec. 2004 Dear Doctor Letter 5003 Feb. 8, 2005 Conference FDA and BPV re Recovery Retrievable (K031328) 5017 Aug. 5, 1999 R&D Technical Report RNF Migration Study, Design Verification (RD-RPT-100) 5022 RD-LNB-087 Laboratory Notebook 5037 ETR-05-02-02 (Effects of Changes to the Recovery Filter & The Femoral Delivery System on Filter Stresses Based on FEA Analysis) 5126 Guidance for Industry and FDA Reviewers/Staff - Guidance for Cardiovascular Intravascular Filter 510(k) Submissions 5126 Guidance for Industry and FDA Reviewers/Staff - Guidance for Cardiovascular Intravascular Filter 510(k) Submissions 5164 July 8, 2003 Fax IMPRA to FDA re Recovery Retrievable (K031328) 17 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 5169 REDACTED Apr. 25, 2003 Recovery Retrievable Abbreviated 510(k) (K031328) 5177 Nov. 27, 2002 FDA Clearance Letter re Recovery Permanent (K022236) (Substantial Equivalence) 5178 Oct. 25, 2002 Letter IMPRA to FDA re Recovery (K022236) 5179 Oct. 4, 2002 Letter FDA to IMPRA re Recovery (K022236) 5182 Aug. 30, 2002 Letter IMPRA to FDA re Recovery (K022236) 5187 Aug. 5, 2002 Letter FDA to IMPRA re Recovery (K022236) 5189 July 10, 2002 IMPRA Recovery Permanent Special 510(k) (K022236) 5193 Feb. 28, 2005 Letter BPV to FDA re FDA AI re Recovery Retrievable (K031328) 5195 Nov. 30, 2004 Letter FDA to BPV re Recovery IFU and DDL, dear doctor letter 5196 Oct. 5, 2004 Letter BPV to FDA re Recovery IFU and DDL 5197 July 25, 2003 FDA Clearance Letter re Recovery Retrievable (K031328) (Substantial Equivalence) 5232 RD-RPT-116 (RNF Migration Study) (Test report for RD-SOP-035.02) RD-RPT-116 5233 RD-SOP-054.00 (Recovery Filter Endura TEC Fatigue Testing SOP NMT) 5234 RD-RPT-099 (Recovery Filter Endura TEC Fatigue Testing Report NMT) 5238 Slides from Bariatric Surgeons Panel Meeting on Feb. 12, 2005 5239 Jan. 21, 2005 Conference FDA and BPV re DDL and Recovery Retrievable (K031328) 5247 May 11, 2005 BPV began distributing DCL 5252 ETR-04-03-02 (RNF v. Competitive Product -- migration resistance) 5268 NMT's 510(k) (K963016) for modifications to the SNF(submitted by Hogan & Hartson) 5272 Nov. 23, 2009 BPV's Eclipse Filter System Special 510(k) (K093659) 5273 Jan. 14, 2010 FDA Clearance Letter Eclipse Filter (K093659) (Substantial Equivalence) 18 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 5283 G2 IFU (Femoral) PK5250500 Rev. 0 01/08 5290 TD-00456 (EVEREST Study Final Report) 5296 G2 Filter Product Performance Specification, v.2 5301 ETR-05-01-06 Animal Model Evaluation of Recovery Filter G1A Femoral System Report 5302 TPR 05-01-13 G1A Recovery Filter Femoral System Design Verification and Validation Protocol 5303 ETR-05-02-05 (G2® DV&V summary testing) 5304 ETR 05-02-11 G1A Recovery Filter Femoral System Chronic Animal Study Report 5315 Phase 2 Design Review G1A Recovery Filter Femoral Delivery System, BPV-17-01-00121226 -255 5316 Phase 3 Design Review (Design Review 3 & 4) G1A Recovery Filter Femoral Delivery System, BPV-17-01- 00121256 -286 5322 Nov. 2, 2005 FDA Grants Full Approval of G2 Everest Study (G051304) 5323 Aug. 8, 2005 FDA Grants BPV Conditional Approval for G2 Everest Study (G050134) 5324 July 8, 2005 BPV's original IDE submission re G2 Everest Study (G050134) 5325 REDACTED Oct. 3, 2005 Letter BPV to FDA re G2 Everest Study (G051034) and Conditional Approval 5329 REDACTED June 21, 2006 Letter BPV to FDA re G2 Everest Study (G051304) IDE Supplement 5333 Feb. 2, 2007 Letter BPV to FDA re G2 Everest Study (G051304) Annual Progress Report 5334 Sept. 21, 2007 Letter FDA to BPV Questions re G2 Everest Study (G051304) 5335 Aug. 23, 2007 Letter BPV to FDA re G2 Everest Study (G051304) Annual Progress Report 5336 Oct. 25, 2007 Letter BPV to FDA re Responses to FDA re G2 Everest Study (G051304), BPV-17-01-00123498 -562 5339 Jan. 15, 2008 FDA Clearance Letter G2 Filter Retrievable (K073090) (Substantial Equivalence) 5340 Oct. 31, 2007 BPV's G2 Filter Retrievable Traditional 510(k) (K073090) 5343 Aug. 29, 2005 FDA Clearance Letter re G2 Permanent (K050558) (Substantial Equivalence) 19 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 5344 July 28, 2005 Letter FDA to BPV re AI re Modified Recovery (K050558) 5348 Mar. 30, 2005 Letter FDA to BPV re Modified Recovery (K050558) 5349 Mar. 2, 2005 BPV's Modified Recovery Filter Special 510(k) (K050558) 5350 REDACTED June 3, 2005 Letter BPV to FDA re Modified Recovery conversion Traditional 510(k) (K050558) 5352 Aug. 10, 2005 Letter BPV to FDA Responses to AI re G2 (K050558) 5353 Nov. 25, 2005 FDA Clearance Letter G2 Filter - Jugular (K052578) (Substantial Equivalence) 5354 Sept. 19, 2005 BPV's G2 Filter - Jugular Subclavian Delivery Kit Special 510(k) (K052578) 5361 Sept. 25, 2006 BPV's G2 Filter - Femoral Delivery Kit Special 510(k) (K062887) 5362 Oct. 26, 2006 FDA Clearance Letter G2 Filter - Femoral Delivery Kit (K062887) 5368 July 30, 2008 FDA Clearance Letter G2 Express Filter (K080668) (Substantial Equivalence) 5373 Mar. 7, 2008 BPV's G2 Express Filter Special 510(k) (K080668) 5376 Oct. 31, 2008 FDA Clearance Letter G2X Filter (K082305) Substantial Equivalence 5379 Aug. 12, 2008 BPV's G2X Filter Special 510(k) (K082305) 5384 G2 Express Feasibility Acute Animal Study Report TR-07-05-18 5385 G2 Express Filter Arm Fatigue Comparison TR-07-07-04 5483 sopq1417500 Rev 1 -- Statistical Complaint Trending Procedure PMA Related, BPV-17-01-00144123 - 126 5486 Dec. 17, 2009 Letter from BPV to FDA re Eclipse Filter System Response to FDA Questions (K093659) 5488 June 21, 2010 Letter from BPV to FDA re Eclipse Filter System Response to FDA Questions (K101431) 5523 ETR-04-03-05 (RNF Characterization testing comparing GFO v. NMT manufactured filters) (followed TPR-04-02- 02) ETR-04-03-05, Rev. 0 (GFO and NMT Manufactured Recovery; Filters Migration Resistance Comparison, Phase 1) 20 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 5526 TPR-04-02-02 (Protocol for RNF Migration Testing v. Competitive) Test Protocol Number TPR-04-02-02 (Rev. 0) -- Characterization of the Recovery Filter (RF) - Migration Resistance 5534 Picture of Clot from Feb. 2004 RNF Migration 5536 Meeting Summary from Filter Expert Panel June 1, 2006 5537 June 2006 Expert Panel Meeting Slides 5539 Only admitted G2 Caudal Migration Failure Investigation Report Aug. 4, 2005 G2 Filter Caudal Migration Failure Investigation pgs. 12 -32 Report (FIR-06-01-01) G2 Caudal Migration Failure Investigation Report 5560 Standard Operating Procedures / Division Operating Procedures -- CQA-STD-R002 Rev 11, BPV-17-01-00166749 - 776. 5561 Standard Operating Procedures / Division Operating Procedures -- CQA-STD-R002 Rev 12, BPV-17-01-00166777 - 806 5563 Standard Operating Procedures / Division Operating Procedures -- CQA-STD-R002 REv 14 5565 Standard Operating Procedures / Division Operating Procedures -- RA-STD-002 Rev 10 5586 May 20, 2010 BPV's Eclipse Filter Special 510(k) (K101431) 5587 June 18, 2010 Letter FDA to BPV re FDA AI Demand re Eclipse (K101431) 5588 Dec. 15, 2009 Letter FDA to BPV re FDA Al Demand re Eclipse (K093659) 5589 June 22, 2010 - FDA Clearance Letter for Eclipse Filter (K101431) (Substantial Equivalence) 5593 Aug. 14, 2009 Conference FDA and BPV re future Eclipse Filter 510(k) 5602 REDACTED FDA CONTACT REPORT January 7 2010 FINAL 5612 REDACTED Nov. 17, 2009 (Filters and future submissions) 5691 Only admitted BPV FDA 483 Update Response March 26, 2015, BPV-17-01-00200156 - 338 pgs. 12-32 21 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 5706 Only admitted September 3 2015 Update Response to Warning Letter issued July 13 2015.pdf pgs. 48-61 5851 TD-04698 Retrospective IVC Filter Review.pdf 5872 FDA Warning Close Out Letter 5874 Bard filter rate information December 2016 5877 1996 Memo from Veronica Price 5879 April 11, 2006 Letter to FDA re Caudal Migration 5880 March 23, 2006 Letter to FDA re G2 Caudal Migration 5881 May 11, 2006 Letter to FDA re Caudal Migration 5905 Jan. 22, 2005 Email to FDA 5923 REDACTED September 2010 Letter to Clinicians re FDA PHN 5929 TR-07-12-01 (Test Report re G2 Express DV& V Flat Plate Fatigue and Corrosion) 5931 G2X (Jugular) 2009.10 – PK5100070 rev. 5 IFU 5942 January 7, 2010 FDA PowerPoint Presentation 5946 QMBR—July 2006 5949 ETR-06-05-02 (Test report re G2® Clot Trapping Efficiency) 5967 G2 Risk Benefit Analysis (RBA-0003, Rev. 0) 5970 HHE re G2 Caudal Migration February 15, 2006 5991 FM1287100 Rev. 5 (MDR Reportability Guidelines) 5994 TD-04316 Nov. 4, 2015 FDA and Bard Teleconference 5995 TD-04326 Oct. 26, 2015 FDA and Bard Teleconference 6013 Dec. 27, 2010 Letter from BPV to FDA re Meridian 22 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 6046 August 28, 2006 EVEREST Medical Monitor Adjudication Meeting Minutes 6061 Aug. 22, 2005 Internal FDA memo reviewing BPV's Responses to FDA Al re G2 (K050558) 6064 July 26, 2005 Internal FDA memo re BPV Responses to FDA AI re Modified Recovery (K050558) 6075 Nov. 10, 2004 FDA Internal Memo re Dear Doctor Letter 6082 FDA_PRODUCTION_00001288 -- July 2, 2003 Email chain FDA and BPV re Recovery Retrievable (K031328) 6089 Product Development Cycle PPT 6842 ACR-SIR-SPR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filter Placement for the Prevention of Pulmonary Embolism. Revised 2016. *** Note: “Admitted for the limited purpose to establish knowledge to the medical community, not for the truth of the matter asserted.” 6892 Binkert CA, Drooz AT, Caridi JG, Sands MJ, Bjarnason H, Lynch FC, Rilling WS, Zambuto DA, Stavropoulos SW, Venbrux AC, Kaufman JA. Technical success and safety of retrieval of the G2 filter in a prospective, multicenter study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 Nov;20(11):1449-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.08.007. 6991 FDA Safety - Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filters: Initial Communication: Risk of Adverse Events with Long Term Use, 08/09/2010. 6992 FDA Safety Communications, Removing Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters. 05/06/2014. http://wayback.archive- it.org/7993/20170722215731/https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm396377.htm 6993 FDA Safety Communications, Removing Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Initial Communication. 08/09/2010. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm221676.htm 7312 SIR Guidelines for IVC Filters *** Note: “Admitted for the limited purpose to establish knowledge to the medical community, not for the truth of the matter asserted.” 23 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 7411 2008 Surgeon General's Call to Action re PE and DVT 7753 2014 Draft FDA Guidance re Benefit-Risk Factors When Determining Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications 510k with Different Technological Characteristics 7758 2014 FDA Guidance re 510k Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications 7771 Braun Vena Tech LP Femoral – October 2010 7787 Cordis Optease Femoral Jugular Antecubital - 2013 7795 Screenshot from FDA, MAUDE - Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience, available online at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/ scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/search.cfm 7960 IVC Filters Clinical Overview 7961 Corporate Quality Assurance Manual, Standard for Product Complaint Handling 7962 Corporate Quality Assurance Manual, Standard for Medical Device Reporting 7900 Demonstrative depiction of sales of bard’s retrievable IVC filters 8325 Eclipse IFU 02.2010 PK5100600 Rev. 1 8358 TR-09-10-15 -- Eclipse Flat Plate Fatigue and Corrosion Examination of the Vail (Eclipse) Filter 8359 TR-09-10-16 DV&V Eclipse Filter Arm Fatigue Comparison Study (Project #8113) 8362 Eclipse Filter Patient Questions & Answers 8368 TP-09-10-15 Rev. 0 - Eclipse DV&V Flat Plate Fatigue and Corrosion Test Protocol 8482 Bard IVC Filter G3 Design/Development Timeline 8546 Draft Test Report re Rotary Beam Fatigue of Nitinol Wire 8572 G3 Meeting Minutes Nov 27, 2007 8574 TR 09-10-10, Test Report Cyclic Fatigue Testing of Electropolished Vail Filter Wire 8575 TP 09-10-10, Test Protocol Cyclic Fatigue Testing of Electropolished Vail Filter Wire 24 In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD) Exhibit 2 – Admitted Exhibit List from Bellwether Trials and Documents No Longer Subject to Protective Order Trial Notes Description Ex. No. 8583 G3 Project Status Report April 19, 2006 8837 Defendants' Exhibit 10 to Joint Report on Determining Filter Type 9080 10/7/07 Email from Dr. Lehman Document deemed no longer subject to the Protective Order Trial Ex. Notes Description No. 908 Ciavarella Deposition, 03/01/2011 - Exhibit 12 - 5/11/2005 "Dear Colleague" letter from BPV re. the Recovery filter system 25