Pence v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration ( 2019 )

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 4 || Danielle Lynne Pence, ) No. CV 18-00218-TUC-JAS (DTF) ) 5 Plaintiff, ) ORDER ) 6 || vs. ) ) 7 ) Commissioner of Social Security) 8 || Administration, ) ) 9 Defendant. ) ) 10 1] Pending before the Court 1s a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge 12 || Ferraro. As the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation appropriately resolved the 13 || issues at bar, the objections are denied.' 14 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 15 | (1) Magistrate Judge Ferraro’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) is accepted and 16 || adopted. 17 || (2) The decision of the ALJ is affirmed. 18 || (3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. 19 DATED this 24" day of September, 2019. 20 21 | ? 22 eee. co. ss 23 James A. “x United States District Judge 25 26 'The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation. 27 |] 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court reviews for clear error the unobjected-to 28 portions of the Report and Recommendation. See Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).