- 1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 David Lee Frater, No. CV-19-02168-PHX-DGC (MHB) 10 Movant/Defendant, No. CR-14-01517-PHX-DGC 11 vs. 12 United States of America, ORDER 13 Respondent/Plaintiff. 14 15 16 David Frater has filed a request for an “independent panel rehearing” of the 17 dismissal of his § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence in Case No. CR-14-01517. Doc. 24.1 18 For reasons stated below, the Court construes the request as a timely notice of appeal. 19 I. Background. 20 Frater pled guilty to one count of possession of child pornography in violation of 18 21 U.S.C. §§ 2252 and 2256. CR Doc. 131. On May 9, 2016, the Court sentenced him to 125 22 months in prison followed by lifetime supervised release. CR Doc. 174. The Ninth Circuit 23 upheld the plea and sentence. CR Doc. 171; United States v. Frater, 735 Fed. App’x 467 24 (9th Cir. 2018). 25 Frater asserts four grounds for relief in his § 2255 motion: (1) the New Zealand 26 police department unlawfully searched and seized his home computer; (2) the law requires 27 1 Citations to documents in the criminal case are denoted “CR Doc.” Citations are 28 to page numbers attached to the top of pages by the Court’s electronic filing system. 1 that the government produce a minimum of three verified pornographic images of children 2 who have been identified as victims; (3) unverified secondary evidence was presented in a 3 superseding indictment; and (4) outlawing sexually explicit photographs of children 4 propagates crimes against them by repressing information the public needs to identify 5 victims and perpetrators. Doc. 1 at 4-8. Magistrate Judge Michelle Burns issued a report 6 recommending that the motion be denied because none of Frater’s grounds for relief 7 concern the voluntary and intelligent acceptance of his plea agreement. Doc. 15 at 2-3; see 8 also CR Doc. 103; United States v. Frater, No. CR-14-01517-PHX-DGC, 2016 WL 9 795839, at *4 (D. Ariz. Mar. 1, 2016) (denying Frater’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea). 10 The Court agreed with Judge Burns and denied Frater’s motion. Doc. 22. The Clerk 11 dismissed this action on April 30, 2020. Doc. 23. 12 II. Frater’s Request. 13 Frater requests an independent panel rehearing because the Court’s order denying 14 his § 2255 motion is “prejudicial, biased, flawed, [and] filled with multiple judicial errors 15 and misstatements[.]” Doc. 24 at 1. Frater cites no rule or legal authority in support of his 16 request, but based on his allegations of bias and judicial misconduct, he clearly does not 17 seek reconsideration by the Court. See id. at 1-3. The Court concludes that Frater’s request 18 reasonably can be construed as a notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. 19 See CR Doc. 136 (Ninth Circuit order construing a similar request as a notice of appeal); 20 In re Sweet Transfer & Storage Inc., 896 F.2d 1189, 1193-94 (9th Cir. 1990) (a document 21 not formally denominated a notice of appeal may be treated as one if it evinces the intent 22 to appeal and provides notice to both the opposing party and the court). Frater’s request is 23 timely because it was filed on May 15, 2020, less than 30 days after the Clerk entered 24 judgment. See Docs. 23, 24; Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(a) (a notice of appeal in a civil case 25 generally “must be filed with the district clerk within 30 days after entry of the judgment 26 or order appealed from”); Banister v. Davis, 140 S. Ct. 1698, 1703 (2020) (same). The 27 Court therefore will direct the Clerk to docket Frater’s request as a notice of appeal. 28 1 IT IS ORDERED: 2 1. Frater’s request for an independent panel rehearing of the dismissal of his § 2255 motion (Doc. 24) is construed as a notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of 4| Appeals. 5 2. The Clerk is directed to docket the request as a notice of appeal filed on 6| May 15, 2020. See CR Doc. 136. 7 Dated this 25th day of June, 2020. 8 : Dsansl 6. Cou Daud &, phth ll David G. Campbell Senior United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Document Info
Docket Number: 2:19-cv-02168
Filed Date: 6/25/2020
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/19/2024