Camoscio v. Commonwealth of Mass ( 1993 )


Menu:
  • March 23, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

    FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

    ___________________

    No. 92-2386

    FRANK J. CAMOSCIO,

    Plaintiff, Appellant,

    v.

    COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS AND

    THE BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PODIATRY,

    Defendants, Appellees.

    __________________

    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

    [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge ]

    ___________________

    Before

    Torruella, Cyr and Boudin

    Circuit Judges .

    ___________________

    Frank J. Camoscio on brief pro se.

    Scott Harshbarger , Attorney General, and Beth D. Levi , Assistant Attorney General, on Memorandum in Support of the Motion for Summary Affirmance for appellees.

    __________________

    __________________

    Per Curiam . We have reviewed the record in this case and are persuaded that this action, the appellant's third against the defendant Board of Registration in Podiatry, is frivolous, vexatious, and barred by res judicata , the Rooker doctrine, and the statute of limitations. See Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. Street v. Vose , 936 F.2d 38 (1st Cir. 1991)(per curiam). Accordingly, the appellees' motion for summary disposition is allowed and the judgment dismissing the instant complaint is affirmed. We further affirm the district court's order enjoining the appellant from filing any further actions without either obtaining leave of court or the aid and signature of counsel.

Document Info

Docket Number: 92-2386

Filed Date: 3/23/1993

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021