United States v. McGuire , 306 F. App'x 621 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                 Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter
    United States Court of Appeals
    For the First Circuit
    No. 08-1461
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Appellee,
    v.
    MITCHELL MCGUIRE,
    Defendant, Appellant.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
    [Hon. George Z. Singal, U.S. District Judge]
    Before
    Lipez, Selya and Howard, Circuit Judges.
    Mitchell McGuire on brief pro se.
    Renée M. Bunker, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and Paula D.
    Silsby, United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
    January 14, 2009
    Per Curiam.   This is defendant Mitchell McGuire's pro se
    appeal from the district court's denial of a sentence reduction
    under 
    18 U.S.C. § 3582
     and the recently amended crack guidelines.1
    The only argument that defendant makes on appeal is that the
    district court denied him due process by treating his motion for
    appointment of counsel as a motion for a sentence reduction and
    denying it as such.
    We need not consider the merits of that due-process
    argument because any error in denying a reduction without first
    giving defendant an opportunity to be heard was harmless; it is
    clear that the reduction would have been correctly denied in any
    event.   United States v. Ganun, 
    547 F.3d 46
    , 47 (1st Cir. 2008)
    (per curiam).   As recognized by the district court, defendant was
    statutorily ineligible for a sentence reduction under 
    18 U.S.C. § 3582
    (c)(2) because his guideline range was based on the career
    offender guideline rather than the crack guideline and therefore
    was not "based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been
    lowered" by the recent crack cocaine amendments.   United States v.
    Ayala-Pizarro, 
    2008 WL 5338459
    , at *1 (1st Cir. Dec. 23, 2008);
    United States v. Caraballo, 
    2008 WL 5274853
    , at *5 (1st Cir. Dec.
    22, 2008).
    1
    Amendment 706, effective November 1, 2007, reduced the base
    offense levels for crack offenses by two levels. Amendment 713,
    effective March 3, 2008, made amendment 706 retroactive.
    -2-
    Accordingly,   the   district   court's   order   denying   a
    sentence reduction is affirmed.
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-1461

Citation Numbers: 306 F. App'x 621

Judges: Lipez, Selya, Howard

Filed Date: 1/14/2009

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024