Mackin v. City of Boston ( 1992 )


Menu:
  • USCA1 Opinion









    July 20, 1992

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
    _________________________


    No. 91-2207


    LAWRENCE MACKIN, ET AL.,
    Plaintiffs, Appellants,

    v.

    CITY OF BOSTON, ET AL.,
    Defendants, Appellees

    _________________________


    ERRATA SHEET
    ERRATA SHEET

    The opinion of the Court issued on July 6, 1992, is
    corrected as follows:

    On page 10, line 6, insert "no" between "by" and "means"









































    July 6, 1992




    _________________________

    No. 91-2207

    LAWRENCE MACKIN, ET AL.,
    Plaintiffs, Appellants,

    v.

    CITY OF BOSTON, ET AL.,
    Defendants, Appellees.
    _________________________

    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

    [Hon. Walter Jay Skinner, U.S. District Judge]
    ___________________
    _________________________

    Before

    Selya, Circuit Judge,
    _____________
    Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge,
    ____________________
    and Fuste,* District Judge.
    ______________
    _________________________

    Michael D. Powers, with whom Nicholas Foundas was on brief,
    _________________ ________________
    for appellants.
    Lisa J. Stark, Attorney, United States Dept. of Justice,
    ______________
    with whom John R. Dunne, Assistant Attorney General, David O.
    ______________ ________
    Simon, Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General, and David K.
    _____ ________
    Flynn, Attorney, United States Dept. of Justice, were on brief,
    _____
    for the federal appellee.
    Albert W. Wallis, Corporation Counsel, and Stephen C. Pfaff,
    ________________ ________________
    Assistant Corporation Counsel, on brief for the municipal
    appellees.
    Scott Harshbarger, Attorney General, and William W. Porter,
    _________________ __________________
    Assistant Attorney General, on brief for the state appellee.
    Toni G. Wolfman, Richard M. Brunell, Foley, Hoag & Eliot,
    ________________ ___________________ ____________________
    Alan Jay Rom, and Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law,
    ____________ _____________________________________________
    on brief for appellee Boston Chapter, N.A.A.C.P., Inc.

    _________________________


    _________________________

    _______________
    *Of the District of Puerto Rico, sitting by designation.














    SELYA, Circuit Judge. Thirty-five white male
    SELYA, Circuit Judge.
    _______________

    applicants for positions in the Boston Fire Department (the

    Department) filed suit in the district court on September 14,

    1989. The plaintiffs alleged that a bevy of named defendants,

    including the City of Boston, various municipal officials, and

    the state personnel administrator, discriminated against them on

    the basis of race both in constituting an eligibility list and in

    making appointments to positions within the Department by means

    of the list.1 The district court granted summary judgment for

    the defendants. We affirm.

    I. BACKGROUND
    I. BACKGROUND

    The two original suits described in note 1, supra,
    _____

    resulted in the entry of the so-called Beecher decree. See
    _______ ___

    Boston Chapter, NAACP, Inc., v. Beecher, 371 F. Supp. 507, 520-23
    ___________________________ _______

    (D. Mass.), aff'd, 504 F.2d 1017 (1st Cir. 1974), cert. denied,
    _____ _____ ______

    421 U.S. 910 (1975). Since 1974, the hiring of firefighters in

    much of Massachusetts has been circumscribed by this decree.

    Over time, the decree has been supplemented by several consent

    decrees designed to implement administrative procedures for

    offering examinations, establishing eligibility lists, releasing

    ____________________

    1The United States joined the defendants in opposing
    plaintiffs' requests for relief. The government's standing stems
    from the district court's grant of its motion to consolidate
    plaintiffs' suit with two suits filed in the early 1970s, one of
    which was initiated by the United States, concerning the entry-
    level exam then used by the state and various municipalities,
    including Boston, to screen applicants for firefighters'
    positions. In addition, the Boston Chapter of the National
    Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)
    intervened as a defendant. It, too, opposed the plaintiffs'
    requests.

    3














    municipalities from continuing judicial oversight, and the like.

    We understand the plaintiffs to be challenging both the Beecher
    _______

    decree and the consent decrees entered to effectuate it. In

    general, however, we will refer to the decree in the singular,

    since it is the Beecher decree that is the cynosure of the
    _______

    parties' arguments.

    Unlike some 30-odd other fire departments which

    heretofore met the goals of the decree and gained release from

    its constraints, the City of Boston remains under its aegis. In

    1987, the state personnel administrator, acting on behalf of the

    Department, conducted a written examination for the position of

    firefighter. The personnel administrator then compiled an

    eligibility list which gave preferential standing to blacks and

    Spanish-surnamed individuals.2 Despite the fact that all 35

    appellants earned perfect scores on the 1987 examination, they

    were ranked below several minority candidates who earned lower

    scores. As a result, appellants were disadvantaged with respect

    to vacant firefighter positions.



    ____________________

    2The eligibility list was assembled according to the
    procedures specified in the decree. See Beecher, 371 F. Supp. at
    ___ _______
    522-23. Briefly stated, those procedures stipulated that the
    candidates placed on the list must have passed a properly
    validated qualifying examination and otherwise have met all
    eligibility requirements for the position. Beyond that point,
    the list was to consist of one minority candidate (i.e., black or
    Spanish-surnamed) for each white candidate. The decree
    contemplated the continued use of statutory preferences ceding
    pride of place to veterans, children of deceased or permanently
    disabled firefighters, and the like, see, e.g., Mass. Gen. Laws
    ___ ____
    Ann. ch. 31, 26, 40 (1992), even if those persons achieved
    lower test scores than other qualified white candidates.

    4














    In the district court, appellants sought a salmagundi

    of relief, including an order placing their names at the top of

    the certified eligibility list and an injunction prohibiting

    continued preferential treatment of black and Spanish-surnamed

    persons in connection with available firefighting jobs. They

    contended that Boston had met the decree's objectives because, in

    1989, the Department had achieved a percentage of black and

    Spanish-surnamed members higher than the percentage of such

    minorities in Boston's general population at the time the decree

    was originally entered. Appellants also claimed that, to the

    extent anything remained to be done, the decree's ameliorative

    purposes could be satisfactorily accommodated without any

    affirmative action because the 1987 entrance examination for

    firefighters was race-neutral. Finally, appellants charged that

    the decree swept too broadly and, therefore, should not be

    enforced.

    In due course, both sides moved for summary judgment.

    The district court denied the plaintiffs' motion and granted the

    defendants' motion. At that point, plaintiffs switched gears,

    moving for reconsideration on completely different grounds. The

    district court denied the motion. On appeal, plaintiffs protest

    both the entry of summary judgment and the ensuing refusal to

    reconsider.

    II. THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE
    II. THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE

    It is clear that, when a judicial decree affording

    race-conscious relief is challenged, the decree must be subjected


    5














    to strict scrutiny. See City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488
    ___ ________________ _______________

    U.S. 469, 494 (1989) (plurality opinion); Wygant v. Jackson Bd.
    ______ ___________

    of Educ., 476 U.S. 267, 273 (1986) (plurality opinion). Such
    ________

    scrutiny requires a reviewing court to vouchsafe that the relief

    is both warranted by a strong state interest and narrowly

    tailored to further that interest. See Stuart v. Roache, 951
    ___ ______ ______

    F.2d 446, 449 (1st Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 60 U.S.L.W. 3689
    _____ ______

    (1992). It cannot be gainsaid that, when a race-conscious

    employment initiative is reasonably necessary to remedy the

    effects of past discrimination practiced by a public employer, a

    compelling state interest exists. See United States v. Paradise,
    ___ _____________ ________

    480 U.S. 149, 167 (1987) (plurality opinion); Stuart, 951 F.2d at
    ______

    449. In this case, appellants do not argue that the original

    finding of discrimination was flawed. Rather, their focus is on

    the continuing need for affirmative action, and particularly, the

    need for the type and kind of affirmative action required by the

    Beecher decree.
    _______

    Along those lines, we believe that district courts

    should be flexible in considering requests for relaxation of, or

    release from, decrees which were initially established to bring

    about needed institutional reforms. See Rufo v. Inmates of
    ___ ____ ___________

    Suffolk County Jail, 112 S. Ct. 748, 760 (1992) (considering
    ____________________

    motion to modify a consent decree). In the context of civil

    rights litigation, a central consideration in determining whether

    to dissolve structural remedies is whether the agency in question

    has come into compliance with constitutional requirements. Put


    6














    another way, an inquiring court should ask whether the goals of

    the litigation, as incorporated in the outstanding decree, have

    been completely achieved. Board of Educ. v. Dowell, 111 S. Ct.
    _______________ ______

    630, 636-37 (1991). Moreover, federal courts, in mulling whether

    to relax or abandon their supervision over the operation of local

    governmental units, should take federalism concerns into account,

    ever mindful that the "legal justification for displacement of

    local authority . . . is a violation of the Constitution by the

    local authorities." Id. at 637. An intrusion by a federal court
    ___

    into the affairs of local government should be kept to a bare

    minimum and not be allowed to continue after the violation has

    abated and its pernicious effects have been cured.

    To the extent that the plaintiffs here are seeking

    relaxation of one or more consent decrees, see supra pp. 2-3, it
    ___ _____

    must be remembered that "a party seeking modification of a

    consent decree bears the burden of establishing that a

    significant change in circumstances warrants a revision of the

    decree." Rufo, 112 S. Ct. at 760. That party "may meet its
    ____

    initial burden by showing either a significant change in factual

    conditions or in law." Id. Dissolution or relaxation of a
    ___

    consent decree may be justified in a variety of circumstances,

    for example, when "changed factual conditions make compliance

    with the decree substantially more onerous." Id.; see also id.
    ___ ___ ____ ___

    at 760-63 (listing other bases for modifying or dissolving a

    consent decree in the context of an institutional reform case).

    III. ANALYSIS
    III. ANALYSIS


    7














    It is against this backdrop that we turn to appellants'

    asseverational array. We treat serially with appellants' three

    main arguments. We then deal in one fell swoop with the

    exhortations contained in the motion for reconsideration.

    A.
    A.
    __

    Positing that the decree contemplates no more than the

    achievement of minority representation in the Department

    commensurate with the percentage of minorities resident in Boston

    at the time the decree was entered, appellants assert that the

    Department has already reached this modest pinnacle. Even

    assuming that the factual premise anent the Department's present

    composition is true, this postulate tortures the language of the

    decree, disregards the parties' consistent practice while

    operating under the decree, and defies common sense.

    First, the relevant language of the decree is most

    naturally read as referring to contemporaneous population

    figures: "As a city or town achieves a complement of minorities

    commensurate with the percentage of minorities within the

    community, certification will be made according to existing

    Massachusetts law." Beecher, 371 F. Supp. at 523. Had the
    _______

    district court and the existing parties intended to embody in the

    decree a stipulation that a community would be released from the

    prescribed procedures upon reaching a complement of minorities

    commensurate with the percentage of minorities within the

    community in 1974, we feel confident that the decree would have

    said so.


    8














    Second, the undisputed evidence concerning practice

    under the decree indicates beyond hope of contradiction that

    applications for the release of municipalities from the decree's

    burdens have universally been guided by reference to

    contemporaneous population statistics. Few things evidence a

    decree's meaning more persuasively than an immutable, decade-old

    pattern of past practice under the decree, consensually engaged

    in by all sides in the underlying litigation that produced the

    decree.

    Third, common sense suggests that it would be whimsical

    to peg parity ratios to obsolete population figures in this sort

    of context. The logical extension of appellants' argument is

    that a locality could not be freed from the decree's requirements

    even if its minority population dropped precipitously, to the

    point where the percentage of minority firefighters in service

    far exceeded the current percentage of minorities in the relevant

    population, as long as the percentage of minority firefighters

    remained lower than the 1974 percentage. We think it is

    farfetched to assume that the district court or the parties

    intended the decree to work in so quirky a fashion.

    In addition to the obvious practical problems with

    using outdated statistics, there are also sound legal reasons for

    reading the terms of the decree to refer to current population

    levels. One implication of the recent Supreme Court school

    desegregation decisions is that federal courts, at least in the

    minerun of civil rights and institutional reform cases, have no


    9














    choice but to make decisions about the maintenance, modification,

    or dissolution of structural remedial orders by referring to the

    most current population statistics readily available. After all,

    knowledge of demographic shifts is essential for determining

    whether patterns of minority representation in state institutions

    and organizations reflect state action, which has constitutional

    implications, or private preferences, which, generally, do not.

    See, e.g., Freeman v. Pitts, 112 S. Ct. 1430, 1437-38, 1447-48
    ___ ____ _______ _____

    (1992). We think that the plaintiffs' effort to cling to 1974

    statistics, notwithstanding the availability of supervening

    census data, contradicts Freeman's teachings.
    _______

    In sum, achieving parity in 1974 terms, without more,

    was not a particularly significant datum. In any event, it did

    not serve, in 1989, as a legally sufficient basis for

    defenestrating the Beecher decree.
    _______

    B.
    B.
    __

    Next, appellants contend that the decree was satisfied

    because the qualifying examination that they passed was validated

    under EEOC guidelines and was, therefore, nondiscriminatory.

    This argument overlooks the language of the decree itself. Even

    a cursory reading makes it crystal clear that validated

    examinations are not an end in themselves but merely a means

    toward achieving the decree's actual objective: rough parity (to

    remedy the effects of past discrimination). See, e.g., Beecher,
    ___ ____ _______

    371 F. Supp. at 522 ("Subsequent to obtaining the results of a

    valid examination, the defendant . . . shall promptly commence


    10














    certifying applicants as eligible for appointment [in the

    manner directed by the decree] . . . ."); id. at 522-23
    ___

    (specifying that the "hiring procedure shall apply to all future

    eligibility lists established subsequent to a valid firefighter

    entrance examination"). The argument to the contrary is a mere

    heuristic.3

    C.
    C.
    __

    The appellants also hawk the idea that, even if the

    goals of the Beecher decree have not yet been accomplished, the
    _______

    decree is constitutionally infirm because it sweeps too broadly.

    This argument is by no means a new one. Over 15 years ago, we

    found the decree to be narrowly tailored toward the achievement

    of its legitimate objectives. See Beecher, 504 F.2d at 1027
    ___ _______

    (judging the decree to be "carefully limited in extent and

    duration"). To be sure, in the intervening years the tests for

    determining whether remedial race-conscious relief is, in fact,

    narrowly tailored have been refined and clarified. See, e.g.,
    ___ ____

    ____________________

    3The district court, noting that the test's validity was
    disputed, correctly ruled that the issue was not material. Even
    if the examination was nondiscriminatory, as appellants alleged,
    the paucity of minority representation in the Department
    betokened a failure to achieve the central goal of the decree,
    thus negating any argument that the purposes of the decree had
    been achieved. Summary judgment was, therefore, appropriate.
    See, e.g., Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-48
    ___ ____ ________ ___________________
    (1986) (stating that "the mere existence of some alleged factual
    ____
    dispute between the parties will not defeat an otherwise properly
    supported motion for summary judgment" absent the existence of a
    genuine issue of material fact); Mesnick v. General Elec. Co.,
    _______ __________________
    950 F.2d 816, 822 (1st Cir. 1991) ("Not every discrepancy in the
    proof is enough to forestall a properly supported motion for
    summary judgment; the disagreement must relate to some genuine
    issue of material fact."), petition for cert. filed, 60 U.S.L.W.
    ________________________
    3689 (U.S. March 9, 1992).

    11














    Paradise, 480 U.S. at 177-79 (plurality opinion); Stuart, 951
    ________ ______

    F.2d at 453-55. But, that process of refinement and

    clarification does nothing to call the adequacy of the instant

    decree into serious question.

    We will not wax longiloquent. In determining whether

    or not an order is narrowly tailored, a significant measure of

    deference is owed to the trial court's conclusion that a

    particular kind of relief is essential to heal a constitutional

    wound. See Paradise, 480 U.S. at 183 (plurality opinion). The
    ___ ________

    district court, unlike the court of appeals, "has firsthand

    experience with the parties and is best qualified to deal with

    the 'flinty, intractable realities of day-to-day implementation

    of constitutional commands.'" Id. at 184 (citation omitted).
    ___

    While a district court's discretion is not unbridled, a reviewing

    court, in assessing whether a remedy is narrowly tailored, must

    bear in mind that the fashioning of a structural decree, like the

    decision as to whether to modify or dissolve it, is at bottom an

    exercise of equitable power. See Freeman, 112 S. Ct. at 1444.
    ___ _______

    Given this deferential standard of review, appellants are

    whistling past the graveyard albeit whistling rather loudly

    in inveighing against the reach of the decree's remedial

    provisions.

    In assessing an overbreadth challenge to an order

    directing race-conscious relief in the context of public

    employment, a court should consider, inter alia, the extent to
    _____ ____

    which (i) the beneficiaries of the order are specially


    12














    advantaged, (ii) the legitimate expectancies of others are

    frustrated or encumbered, (iii) the order interferes with other

    valid state or local policies, and (iv) the order contains (or

    fails to contain) built-in mechanisms which will, if time and

    events warrant, shrink its scope and limit its duration. The

    Beecher decree passes this test with flying colors.
    _______



    In this case, only qualified minority candidates are
    _________

    specially advantaged; no minority candidate is placed on the

    eligibility list unless he or she has attained a passing score on

    the entrance examination. This is an important indicium of

    narrow tailoring. See Stuart, 951 F.2d at 454. Relatedly, the
    ___ ______

    decree does not require that minority aspirants be appointed, nor

    does it dispense with the statutory preferences mandated by state

    law. Thus, the decree gives only a limited advantage, not a

    guarantee of employment, to minority applicants. This, too, is a

    significant factor. See Johnson v. Transportation Agency, 480
    ___ _______ ______________________

    U.S. 616, 638 (1987) (approving affirmative action plan because,

    among other things, rather than mandating quota hiring, it

    "merely authorize[d] that consideration be given to affirmative

    action concerns when evaluating qualified applicants"). As a

    result of these features, it can appropriately be said that the

    Beecher decree "is not being used simply to achieve and maintain
    _______

    racial balance, but rather as a benchmark against which the court

    could gauge . . . efforts to remedy past discrimination." Local
    _____

    28, Sheet Metal Workers' Int'l Ass'n v. EEOC, 478 U.S. 421, 477-
    _____________________________________ ____


    13














    78 (1986) (plurality opinion).

    Moreover, the failure to appoint more high-scoring

    white applicants under the decree disturbs no legitimate, firmly

    rooted expectations on the part of those applicants. The record

    shows that, when appellants sought appointment to the Department,

    there were many white candidates with statutory preferences and

    perfect tests scores, and few firefighters' vacancies. Hence,

    irrespective of the decree, appellants could not reasonably have

    felt assured that they would be appointed. This factor, too,

    counsels in favor of upholding the decree. See Stuart, 951 F.2d
    ___ ______

    at 454.

    Finally, the decree's life is limited, remaining in

    force only until its requirements have been met. See Beecher,
    ___ _______

    371 F. Supp. at 523 (providing for release from appointment

    process mandated by the decree "[a]s a city or town achieves a

    complement of minorities commensurate with the percentage of

    minorities within the community"). Limitations of this sort are

    crucial factors in deflecting overbreadth challenges. See
    ___

    Stuart, 951 F.2d at 454. Indeed, the proof of the present
    ______

    pudding is that, since 1974, more than fifty percent of the

    communities originally affected by the decree have already been

    freed from further oversight.

    Mindful of these realities, we conclude that the

    Beecher decree is tailored with sufficient precision to withstand
    _______

    the appellants' imprecations.

    D.
    D.
    __


    14














    On the motion for reconsideration, appellants

    unsuccessfully attempted to raise two additional arguments. They

    claimed, first, that the Department's achievements under the

    decree should be measured not by reference to the census figures

    for black and Spanish-surnamed individuals in the general

    population, but by reference to the census of such persons age 18

    or older, thus dovetailing more snugly with the relevant labor

    pool. They also suggested that blacks and Spanish-surnamed

    individuals should be considered separately; and that, therefore,

    black aspirants should not be entitled to a continuing preference

    as Boston had exceeded the decree's goals with respect to black

    firefighters.

    We need not dwell on the substance of these arguments.

    It is settled law that, once a motion to dismiss or a motion for

    summary judgment has been granted, the district court has

    substantial discretion in deciding whether to reopen the

    proceedings in order to allow the unsuccessful party to introduce

    new material or argue a new theory. See Mariani-Giron v.
    ___ _____________

    Acevedo-Ruiz, 945 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 1991); United States v. 5
    ____________ ______________ _

    Bell Rock Road, 896 F.2d 605, 611 (1st Cir. 1990); Appeal of Sun
    _______________ _____________

    Pipe Line Co., 831 F.2d 22, 25 (1st Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 486
    _____________ _____ ______

    U.S. 1055 (1988); Polyplastics, Inc. v. Transconex, Inc., 827
    __________________ _________________

    F.2d 859, 864 n.4 (1st Cir. 1987); Pagan v. American Airlines,
    _____ __________________

    Inc., 534 F.2d 990, 992-93 (1st Cir. 1976). Consequently, we
    ____

    will overturn the trial court's decision on such a matter only if

    an appellant can persuade us that the refusal to grant favorable


    15














    reconsideration was a clear abuse of discretion. Sun Pipe Line,
    _____________

    831 F.2d at 25; Pagan, 534 F.2d at 993.
    _____

    Here, there is not so much as a whisper of a hint of an

    intimation of an abuse of discretion. The statistics upon which

    appellants belatedly sought to rely (in order to show a more

    precisely defined labor pool) were available to them all along.

    Moreover, those statistics, fairly read, likely tell a different

    story than appellants intend to convey. The most pertinent

    "labor pool" information that can be gleaned from the 1980 census

    figures is the head count of black and Spanish-surnamed

    individuals who were ten years of age, or older, in 1980 a

    number which would give some approximate indication of the number

    of black and Spanish-surnamed individuals who, in 1989, were old

    enough to be considered for firefighters' positions.4 Based on

    those figures, a continuing lack of parity in the Department is

    statistically evident.

    Appellants' other "new" argument that the percentage

    figures for black and Spanish-surnamed individuals should be

    dismembered, so that once parity with the percentage of blacks in

    the labor force is achieved, the decree's guidelines for

    certifying blacks to the eligibility list should be lifted

    fares no better. Once again, the argument relied on information

    that was available well before the time suit was started.

    Moreover, such an approach clearly contradicts the format of the

    ____________________

    4Under state law, see Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 31, 58
    ___
    (1992), firefighters must be at least 19 years of age to qualify
    for appointment.

    16














    original litigation, which constituted combined classes of black

    and Spanish-surnamed persons, not separate black and Spanish-

    surnamed classes. It also contradicts the clear intent of the

    decree and an unbroken skein of preexisting practice under the

    decree's terms.

    When the losing party seeks reconsideration of an

    adverse judgment on a neoteric theory, factors such as due

    diligence and likelihood of success must weigh heavily in the

    balance. Where, as here, the movants' newly emergent arguments

    seem weak and the movants have offered no viable excuse for not

    advancing those arguments in a timely fashion when the parties

    cross-moved for summary judgment, we are unable to discern any

    principled basis on which the district court's denial of the

    motion for reconsideration might be overturned. In this case, as

    in most similarly postured cases, the district court's refusal to

    allow appellants the opportunity to revisit the barn after the

    horse has departed cannot be considered an abuse of discretion.



    Affirmed.
    Affirmed.
    ________
















    17