Fuentes v. Dept. of HHS ( 1997 )

USCA1 Opinion

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]





                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT



                              _________________________





          No. 97-1560



                                   JOSE R. FUENTES,



                                Plaintiff, Appellant,



                                          v.



                            UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,



                                 Defendant, Appellee.



                              _________________________



                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO



                   [Hon. Salvador E. Casellas, U.S. District Judge]
___________________



                              _________________________



                                        Before



                                Selya, Circuit Judge,
_____________



                           Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,
____________________



                              and Lynch, Circuit Judge.
_____________



                              _________________________



               Ferdinand Vargas, on brief for appellant.
________________

               Guillermo  Gil,  United  States   Attorney,  and  Fidel   A.
______________                                    __________

          Sevillano Del-R o, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for
_________________

          appellee.



                              _________________________



                                  December 10, 1997



                              _________________________







































                    Per  Curiam.   The plaintiff  in  this case,  who is  a
Per  Curiam.
___________



          former  employee of  the  United  States  Postal  Service,  seeks



          reinstatement   and  various  other  kinds  of  relief  from  the



          defendant.  We have carefully read the parties' briefs, evaluated



          their legal arguments,  and studied the papers  in the case.   We



          conclude, on whole-record review, that this is a suitable case in



          which  to act upon our long-held belief  that "when a lower court



          produces a  comprehensive, well-reasoned  decision, an  appellate



          court  should refrain from writing at length to no other end than



          to  hear its  own words  resonate."   Lawton v.  State Mut.  Life
______     ________________



          Assur. Co. of Am., 101 F.3d  218, 220 (1st Cir. 1996); accord  In
_________________                                      ______  __



          re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire  Litig., 989 F.2d 36, 38 (1st
___________________________________________



          Cir. 1993).  Hence, we  affirm the judgment for substantially the



          reasons set forth  in the lower court's thoughtful  opinion.  See
___



          Fuentes v. United  States Postal Serv.,  No. 92-1658 (SEC),  slip
_______    ___________________________



          op. (D.P.R. Jan. 23, 1997 (unpublished).   We need go no further.



          The judgment below is summarily affirmed.  See 1st Cir. R. 27.1.
___







                    Affirmed.
Affirmed.
________

































                                          2