Barre Savings Bank v. Broberg ( 1993 )

USCA1 Opinion

          December 21, 1993     [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]


                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ___________________


          No.  93-1372 


            


                                CRAIG VERNON BROBERG,

                                      Appellee,

                                          v.

                                 BARRE SAVINGS BANK,

                                      Appellee,
                                 ____________________

                              PENELOPE NORTHROP BROBERG,
                                      Appellant.
                                  __________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                     [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]
                                             ___________________

                                 ___________________

                                        Before

                                 Breyer, Chief Judge,
                                         ___________
                            Selya and Cyr, Circuit Judges.
                                           ______________

                                 ___________________

               Penelope Northrop Broberg on brief pro se.
               _________________________
               Paul M.  Cranston on Motion  to Dismiss  for appellee  Barre
               _________________
          Savings Bank.


                                  __________________

                                  __________________




















                      Per  Curiam.   Appellants  have  appealed from  the
                      ___________

            district court's  June 3,  1992 order  denying a  preliminary

            injunction in  conjunction  with appellants'  appeal  from  a

            bankruptcy court dismissal of their  action under 11 U.S.C.  

            109(g)(1).   The district court denied preliminary injunctive

            relief because appellants had "failed to submit any affidavit

            from the  Chapter  13 trustee  as directed  by the  [district

            court]" and "the data  submitted being unverified by oath  or

            otherwise,"   had   "failed  to   demonstrate   a  reasonable

            likelihood of  success  on the  merits."   We  have  reviewed

            appellants' brief and the portions  of the district court and

            bankruptcy  court records submitted  to us.   Appellants have

            not  shown  that  the  district court  erred  or  abused  its

            discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief.

                      The  June  3,  1992  order  denying  a  preliminary

            injunction is summarily affirmed.  First Circuit Rule 27.1.





















                                         -2-