Growe v. Malden Mills ( 1994 )

USCA1 Opinion

          June 22, 1994         [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                                     
                                 ____________________

        No. 93-1556

                                     GARY GROWE,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                            MALDEN MILLS INDUSTRIES, INC.,
                           FORSTER MANUFACTURING CO., INC.
                               AND FRASER PAPER, LTD.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                                     
                                 ____________________


                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

                     [Hon. Morton A. Brody, U.S. District Judge]
                                            ___________________

                                                     
                                 ____________________

                                Selya, Cyr and Stahl,

                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________

                                                     
                                 ____________________


             Paul O. Taylor, Alan D. Harris and Harris & Taylor,  on brief for
             ______________  ______________     _______________
        appellant.
             John J. O'Leary, Jr., James M. Saffian, Pierce, Atwood, Scribner,
             ____________________  ________________  _________________________
        Allen, Smith  & Lancaster,  Joseph Michael Roberts,  Grove, Jaskiewicz
        _________________________   ______________________   _________________
        and Cobert, on brief for appellees.
        __________

                                                     
                                 ____________________


                                                     
                                 ____________________






















                    Per  Curiam.   In view  of the  opinion entered  by the
                    Per  Curiam.
                    ___________

          United  States Supreme Court in Security Services, Inc. v. K-Mart
                                          _______________________    ______

          Corp., No. 62 U.S.L.W. 4329 (May  16, 1994), the decision of  the
          _____

          United  States District Court for  the District of  Maine is sum-

          marily affirmed.  See Local Rule 27.1.
                            ___









































                                          2