Velez Vda deFontanez v. Jefferson Pilot ( 1994 )


Menu:
  • USCA1 Opinion









    August 15, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

    ___________________


    No. 93-2268




    MARTA VELEZ VDA DE FONTANEZ,

    Plaintiff, Appellant,

    v.

    JEFFERSON PILOT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

    Defendant, Appellee.

    __________________

    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

    [Hon. Raymond L. Acosta, U.S. District Judge]
    ___________________

    ___________________

    Before

    Torruella, Chief Judge,
    ___________
    Selya and Cyr, Circuit Judges.
    ______________

    ___________________

    Jose L. Delgado Cadilla and Castro & Delgado Cadilla on
    _________________________ __________________________
    brief for appellant.
    Jose Hector Vivas and Vivas & Vivas on brief for appellee.
    _________________ _____________



    __________________

    __________________





















    Per Curiam. Plaintiff requested a voluntary
    ____________

    dismissal without prejudice. The district court "granted"

    plaintiff's motion, but dismissed with prejudice and denied

    plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, which objected to the

    dismissal with prejudice. Plaintiff has appealed from those

    orders.

    While neither the plaintiff nor the district court

    referred to any particular rule, we conclude that the

    dismissal plaintiff requested, and the court entered, was

    pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) (voluntary dismissal by

    order of court), as there is no basis in the record before us

    for an involuntary dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We

    conclude that the court abused its discretion in dismissing

    with prejudice without first giving plaintiff the opportunity

    to withdraw her request for voluntary dismissal. In this

    regard, we agree generally with the discussions in Gravatt v.
    __________

    Columbia University, 845 F.2d 54, 55-56 (2d Cir. 1988), and
    ___________________

    Andes v. Versant Corp., 788 F.2d 1033, 1037 (4th Cir. 1986),
    ______________________

    that if a plaintiff's motion to dismiss without prejudice is

    to be denied, the plaintiff ordinarily should be given the

    opportunity to allow the case to proceed on the merits,

    rather than being subjected to a dismissal with prejudice.

    Plaintiff asks that we direct the district court to

    dismiss without prejudice. We will not do so because on the

    present record we can not say that plaintiff was entitled as



    -2-















    a matter of law to an unconditional dismissal without

    prejudice. We summarily vacate the order of dismissal and

    remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

    Loc. R. 27.1.

    Vacated and remanded.
    ____________________











































    -3-







Document Info

Docket Number: 93-2268

Filed Date: 8/15/1994

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/21/2015