Event Producers v. Tyser & Co. ( 1994 )

USCA1 Opinion

        October 13, 1994        [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT


                                 ____________________


        No. 94-1153

                            EVENT PRODUCERS, INC., ET AL.,

                               Plaintiffs, Appellants,

                                          v.

                       TYSER & CO. NORTH AMERICA, INC., ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.


                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO


                   [Hon. Gilberto Gierbolini, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                  Cyr, Circuit Judge,
                                       _____________
                          Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, and
                                  ____________________
                                Stahl, Circuit Judge.
                                       _____________

                                 ____________________

            Vicente  Santori Coll,  Vicente  Santori  Margarida and  Victor J.
            _____________________   ___________________________      _________
        Casal  Vazquez on brief  for appellants, Event  Producers, Inc., Jorge
        ______________
        Torres Caratini, Miguel Angel Rey and Jose Morales Ortiz.
            Manuel  A. Quilichini on  brief for  defendants/appellees, Tyser &
            _____________________
        Co. North America, Inc., Certain Insurers at Lloyd's of London.


                                 ____________________

                                 ____________________
























                      Per Curiam.    Appellants appeal from a decision of
                      __________

            the district  court  dismissing on  summary  judgment  motion

            their  suit alleging  that  appellees had  wrongfully delayed

            payment of  certain  insurance  proceeds.    After  carefully

            reviewing  the record  in  this case,  we  conclude that  the

            district  court   correctly  granted  summary   judgment  for

            appellees.    Accordingly,  we   affirm  the  decision  below

            essentially for  the reasons  stated in the  district court's

            opinions and orders dated November 24, 1993, and December 28,

            1993.

































                                         -2-