United States v. Cuevas ( 1994 )


Menu:
  • USCA1 Opinion









    September 26, 1994
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

    ___________________




    No. 93-1224

    UNITED STATES,
    Appellee,

    v.

    ABELARDO CUEVAS,
    Defendant, Appellant


    ____________________


    ERRATA SHEET


    This opinion of this court issued on September 22 1994, is
    amended as follows:

    On page 2 line 15 please insert the number "1169-70" after
    the "comma" and the number "1162,".
































    September 21, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
    UNITED STATE COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT


    ____________________


    No. 93-1224

    UNITED STATES,

    Appellee,

    v.

    ABELARDO CUEVAS,

    Defendant, Appellant.


    ____________________

    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

    [Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge]
    ___________________

    ____________________

    Before

    Cyr, Circuit Judge,
    ______________
    Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, and
    ____________________
    Stahl, Circuit Judge.
    ______________

    ____________________

    James B. Krasnoo on brief for appellant.
    ________________


    ____________________

    ____________________





























    Per Curiam. Appellant Abelardo Cuevas appeals his
    __________

    conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to

    distribute, conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to

    distribute, and aiding and abetting same. He also appeals

    his sentence of 235 months imprisonment. We have reviewed

    carefully the record in this case, including the transcript

    of appellant's trial, the transcript of his disposition

    hearing, and appellant's briefs. We find no merit in any of

    appellant's claims that the district court erred either

    during trial or at appellant's sentencing. Appellant's

    objection to the ethnic composition of the jury is foreclosed

    by this court's decision in United States v. Pion, 25 F.3d 18
    _____________ ____

    (1st Cir. 1994). Appellant's claim that he was denied

    effective assistance of counsel should be raised in a

    collateral proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. See,
    ___

    e.g., United States v. Jadusingh, 12 F.3d 1162, 1169-70,
    ___ _____________ _________

    (1st Cir. 1994).

    Affirmed.
    ________

















    -3-







Document Info

Docket Number: 93-1224

Filed Date: 9/26/1994

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/21/2015