Gorod v. National Association ( 1994 )

USCA1 Opinion

          December 21, 1994
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________


        No. 94-1595 

                                  GERTRUDE A. GOROD,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.


                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                   [Hon. Edward F. Harrington, U.S. District Judge]
___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                  Cyr, Circuit Judge,
_____________
                            Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge,
____________________
                              and Stahl, Circuit Judge.
_____________

                                 ____________________

            Gertrude Gorod on brief pro se.
______________
            Joseph L. DeLorey on brief for appellees.
_________________


                                 ____________________


                                 ____________________





















                 Per Curiam.   Pro se plaintiff  Gertrude Gorod has  sued
__________    ___ __

            her former  union,  the National  Association  of  Government

            Employees (NAGE)  and its president,  Kenneth Lyons, alleging

            that  they  intentionally discriminated  against  her on  the

            basis of her age, sex, and religion in violation of Title VII

            of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in

            Employment  Act, 29 U.S.C.  621  et seq.   We have thoroughly

            reviewed the record and the parties' briefs on appeal and are

            persuaded that  the  district court's  analysis  is  correct.

            Accordingly, the judgment of  the district court is affirmed.
________

            See Local Rule 27.1.
___