Toegemann v. City of Cranston ( 1995 )


Menu:
  • USCA1 Opinion



    September 14, 1995 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT



    ____________________


    No. 94-1856

    ARTHUR J. TOEGEMANN,

    Plaintiff, Appellant,

    v.

    CITY OF CRANSTON, ET AL.,

    Defendants, Appellees.


    ____________________

    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND


    [Hon. Francis J. Boyle, Senior U.S. District Judge] __________________________

    ____________________

    Before

    Torruella, Chief Judge ___________
    Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges. ______________

    ____________________

    Arthur J. Toegemann on brief pro se. ___________________
    William F. Holt, Assistant City Solicitor, on brief for appellee ________________
    City of Cranston.
    Seth E. Bowerman and Hanson, Curran, Parks & Whitman on brief for ________________ ________________________________
    appellees Saratoga Hospital and Butler Hospital.
    Joseph A. Keough, Jr., Francis X. Flaherty and Wynn & Wynn on ______________________ ___________________ ____________
    brief for appellee Peter Palombo, Jr.


    ____________________


    ____________________


















    Per Curiam. Upon review of the record and the parties' ___________

    briefs on appeal, we are persuaded that the district court's

    order was fully justified by the plaintiff's history of

    filing meritless actions against many of the named

    defendants. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court

    is affirmed. See Local Rule 27.1. Costs to appellees. ________ ___









































    -2-






Document Info

Docket Number: 94-1856

Filed Date: 9/14/1995

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/21/2015