Ferris, Jr. v. Federal Loan Home ( 1995 )


Menu:
  • USCA1 Opinion








    November 15, 1995 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] NOT FOR PUBLICATION


    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

    _________________________

    No. 95-1367



    MICHAEL E. FERRIS, ET AL.,

    Plaintiffs, Appellants,

    v.

    FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, ET AL.,

    Defendants, Appellees.


    ____________________


    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

    [Hon. Morris E. Lasker, Senior U.S. District Judge] __________________________

    ____________________

    Before

    Selya, Circuit Judge, _____________

    Aldrich, Senior Circuit Judge, ____________________

    and Cyr, Circuit Judge. _____________
    ____________________

    Thomas J. Gleason on brief for appellant. _________________
    Harvey M. Forman, Forman & Forman, and Robert O. Berger, III ________________ _______________ _____________________
    on joint brief for appellees.

    ____________________




    ____________________











    Per Curiam. The plaintiffs, disappointed by the Per Curiam. ___________

    district court's findings of fact and conclusions of law

    following a bench trial, see Ferris v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage ___ ______ __________________________

    Corp., No. 94-10470, slip op. (D. Mass. Mar. 7, 1995), appeal _____

    from the ensuing judgment. The standard of review, though not

    insurmountable, is daunting. See Cumpiano v. Banco Santander ___ ________ _______________

    P.R., 902 F.2d 148, 152 (1st Cir. 1990) (describing high degree ____

    of deference that must "be paid to the trier's assessment of the

    evidence" in a jury-waived trial); Reliance Steel Prods. Co. v. __________________________

    National Fire Ins. Co., 880 F.2d 575, 576-77 (1st Cir. 1989) ________________________

    (similar); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a). This standard makes ___ ____

    it clear that an appellate tribunal "ought not to upset findings

    of fact or conclusions drawn therefrom unless, on the whole of

    the record, [the judges] form a strong, unyielding belief that a

    mistake has been made." Cumpiano, 902 F.2d at 152. In other ________

    words, as long as the district court's rendition of the record is

    plausible, our inquiry is at an end.

    So it is here. We have carefully reviewed the trial

    transcript, the record on appeal, and the parties' briefs. We

    discern no error, and, given the standard of review, we perceive

    no fairly debatable issues demanding extended appellate scrutiny.

    Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment for

    substantially the reasons elucidated in the thorough, well-

    reasoned opinion below.

    We need go no further. The judgment of the district

    court is summarily affirmed. See 1st Cir. R. 27.1. ___





    2









    Affirmed. Affirmed ________























































    3





Document Info

Docket Number: 95-1367

Filed Date: 11/15/1995

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/21/2015