San Gabriel v. United States ( 1996 )

USCA1 Opinion

          April 5, 1996         [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT



                              _________________________



          No. 95-2228





                            MARIA SOCORRO DE SAN GABRIEL,



                                Plaintiff, Appellant,



                                          v.



                          UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL.,



                                Defendants, Appellees.



                              _________________________



                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO



                  [Hon. Salvador E. Cassellas, U.S. District Judge]
___________________



                              _________________________



                                        Before



                                Selya, Circuit Judge,
_____________



                            Aldrich, Senior Circuit Judge,
____________________



                              and Stahl, Circuit Judge.
_____________



                              _________________________



               Luis F. Abreu Elias for appellant.
___________________

               Guillermo   Gil,  United  States   Attorney,  and  Fidel  A.
_______________                                    _________

          Sevillano  del   Rio,  Assistant  United  States   Attorney,  for
____________________

          appellees.



                              _________________________







                              _________________________

































                    Per Curiam.  Upon careful examination of the record and
Per Curiam.
__________



          the  briefs in  this  matter, we  conclude  that the  plaintiff's



          appeal  is  meritless,  and  we therefore  summarily  affirm  the



          judgment of the district court.  See 1st Cir. R. 27.1.
___







                    Affirmed.  Costs to appellees.
Affirmed.  Costs to appellees.
________   __________________





















































































                                          2